Comments: 12
Pinniplane [2020-12-18 14:01:28 +0000 UTC]
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Despler [2018-07-16 18:10:43 +0000 UTC]
pls no block
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tulmur95 In reply to Despler [2018-07-16 18:18:18 +0000 UTC]
I won't block you if you stop posting immature comments.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
eightyator [2018-02-09 00:00:22 +0000 UTC]
The Mercure! Perhaps one of the most obscure jetliners. Too bad it was a one trick pony. It may have been fantastically efficient on short hops, but a resume with one skill is not impressive.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Tulmur95 In reply to eightyator [2018-02-09 00:34:46 +0000 UTC]
I happened upon the Mercure by chance. I couldn't help but make a drawing featuring it. It's a pity. It had a lot going for it. If only it had greater range, who knows? Maybe they would've had a long production run and occupy the spot the A320 fills now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
eightyator In reply to Tulmur95 [2018-02-18 02:41:50 +0000 UTC]
If not for European aviation's many many commercial flops, they may not have ever pulled together to create Airbus. So, I should like to think the Comet, Mercure, VC-10, One-Eleven, and other poor sellers ultimately played a big part in the course of aviation history.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tulmur95 In reply to eightyator [2018-02-18 17:35:40 +0000 UTC]
I agree. It's like Edison and the lightbulb. Through countless failures, he perfected his creation.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Victorbrine In reply to Tulmur95 [2018-03-27 14:09:47 +0000 UTC]
Failure is not an option. And you need to make mistakes to progress!
So nevertheless, Europe stands strong!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tulmur95 In reply to Victorbrine [2018-03-27 14:18:48 +0000 UTC]
It does. Sometimes the best way to learn is to fail, to lose it all and realize you need to take a different approach.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tulmur95 In reply to Victorbrine [2018-02-06 22:14:06 +0000 UTC]
They do seem to excel with military designs. The civil market? Apart from the Falcon? Not so much.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0