Comments: 34
Timeship [2012-08-13 00:32:55 +0000 UTC]
Wow, the colors are so vibrant, as if it's a digital painting. Great photo reproduction!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Delacreativit [2012-01-29 20:16:53 +0000 UTC]
i'm in love in your work
they breathe life!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Danghieu [2010-07-25 15:37:18 +0000 UTC]
This deviation has been featured at the following [link]
Hope you enjoy!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
HiBa-JaMal [2010-04-30 22:20:54 +0000 UTC]
awesome !
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
niruf [2010-01-30 18:08:27 +0000 UTC]
ok!..so I'd like to fav this a couple more times! beautiful!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
guaya [2010-01-15 18:04:54 +0000 UTC]
Good values!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
faeriecrone [2009-12-02 23:51:22 +0000 UTC]
again ... the glow. interesting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
chairleg [2009-12-02 16:33:09 +0000 UTC]
o holy melon
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Rebel-Apolla [2009-11-22 17:46:11 +0000 UTC]
I love the style of this!
And I adore how you made the fruit look like it was glowing (I don't know if it was intentional or not, but it's really cool.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BWV1068 [2009-11-22 06:23:28 +0000 UTC]
Great painting!! I noticed you use maroger or neo-megilp in many of your paintings. I don't know much about maroger and have had minimal experience w/ neo-meglip, but I thought that neo was [supposed to be] the "new maroger." The fact that you use both must mean that they do not do the same thing to the paint. Can you briefly tell me why you use one over the other? From what I can see, the maroger paintings seem "richer/deeper" in the dark areas, but perhaps it's my imagination. Thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
turningshadow In reply to BWV1068 [2009-11-22 16:00:01 +0000 UTC]
Maroger is handles better but is harder to come by. I get mine from my school, who makes it. I use neo-megilp for convenience. It has a much milder odor than maroger, so it's better for painting at home in my small apartment. Neo-megilp is still great, but I do like maroger better, as it has more 'body'.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Veronika-Art [2009-11-21 11:54:12 +0000 UTC]
May I ask which colours you used for the watermelon? What brand are you using? It`s just amazing!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
turningshadow In reply to Veronika-Art [2009-11-22 04:09:01 +0000 UTC]
Using Winsor Newton Artists oils and some Utrecht paints.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BiggyXpect [2009-11-20 17:43:02 +0000 UTC]
I love how the fruit 'radiates', beautiful
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
magnivon [2009-11-20 17:08:20 +0000 UTC]
You must be best student in your class... excelent execution !
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
andreartstudio [2009-11-20 12:20:14 +0000 UTC]
very very good work ..... wow ....!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
johnpaulthornton [2009-11-20 01:16:27 +0000 UTC]
One of your best, in terms of simplicity and Power!
The textures are fabulous.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Woodland-Mel [2009-11-20 01:06:32 +0000 UTC]
Amazing- (as always!! you've far become one of my favorite artists) I have to ask, because I've been wanting to ask for a while, do you have an explanation of your process anywhere? It looks like you have an under layer of a color/strokes, and then maybe do a rough version with the colors, and then use the fan brush over that to.. smooth/blend it out in some areas, (not sure that's how I want to put that) and then do final brush strokes on top of that DX All guesses. I don't know, just so curious
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
turningshadow In reply to Woodland-Mel [2009-11-20 03:04:26 +0000 UTC]
Sometimes I will show some bits of process stuff for a specific painting in my weekly newsletter. If you'd like to sign up, head over to [link] .
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ArtDoge [2009-11-19 23:27:53 +0000 UTC]
I love how you did the blooming light effects with such simple brushworks! and love how you render aged metallic surfaces!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
turningshadow In reply to j0rosa [2009-11-19 23:27:19 +0000 UTC]
an alla prima (in one session)
4 hours
👍: 0 ⏩: 1