Comments: 29
Jaws43 [2008-03-16 16:15:28 +0000 UTC]
As Joe Cocker Once Sang 'You are so beautiful, to me!'
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ulorinvex In reply to IreneLangholm [2008-01-06 15:45:59 +0000 UTC]
yeah it does. unless theyve changed it very recently
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
crump3t [2008-01-06 06:53:25 +0000 UTC]
that mask is bizarre and slightly unnerving.
well done.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GUNPAI [2008-01-06 01:25:27 +0000 UTC]
wow
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ColdplayaChris [2008-01-05 22:46:06 +0000 UTC]
Lucha Libre anyone?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
tsuminaoshi [2008-01-05 22:01:08 +0000 UTC]
there you go! very pretty!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DrXtreme [2008-01-05 21:04:32 +0000 UTC]
Wow, nice one!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Nachtschattensucher [2008-01-05 20:52:26 +0000 UTC]
Love the mask or the hood.
Looks stumming.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
gooeyness [2008-01-05 20:47:08 +0000 UTC]
hiding you face is a good way to show off your assets although i miss your pretty face
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wom-bat [2008-01-05 20:39:12 +0000 UTC]
While there may be elements of fetish in the outfit I don't think I'd catagorize this as fetish either. Definitely more artistic than fetish, not that fetish can't be artistic...Maybe I should hush before I dig myself too much deeper ^.^;
And I didn't know that about the fetish catagory, thanks for the info.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bluessaurus [2008-01-05 20:24:15 +0000 UTC]
You know, not everybody can see the beauty of a pair of gleaming eyes and lips framed by a stylish latex hood. So, we have these inadequate rules.
Sad, isn't it?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mongolShawn [2008-01-05 18:35:46 +0000 UTC]
Very cool concept. Love the pose and your eyes are perfect here.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0