Comments: 31
ocean-aviator [2016-06-30 01:05:16 +0000 UTC]
You shouldn't trace without explicit permission from the owner. I don't care how old this is, but it's still wrong
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
traltor In reply to ocean-aviator [2016-07-08 18:52:50 +0000 UTC]
i dont think they're even on dA anymore.
they haven't posted at all since 2013.
they've either moved accounts or quit without saying anything.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ocean-aviator In reply to traltor [2016-07-08 19:28:16 +0000 UTC]
So? I'm still allowed to post my opinion.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
traltor In reply to ocean-aviator [2016-07-08 19:29:35 +0000 UTC]
im just saying it'll get you nowhere.
you're basically talking to a brick wall.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ocean-aviator In reply to traltor [2016-07-08 19:42:45 +0000 UTC]
Actually, some random person could be scrolling through here and see my comment and be like "Oh, crap, I shouldn't post my traced pictures!"
And I am perfectly and utterly fine with talking to a brick wall.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ocean-aviator In reply to traltor [2016-07-08 20:32:07 +0000 UTC]
This conversation is over.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ocean-aviator In reply to CuteKittyWiddy [2016-07-08 12:26:49 +0000 UTC]
You don't have to. A lot of people post their photos on their blogs without copyright marks, but they're still copyrighted.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tetra120 [2013-04-27 11:08:33 +0000 UTC]
He looks for me a little like Sandstorm and Firestar from Warrior Cats. x3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SugarrCane In reply to Tetra120 [2013-06-04 18:58:20 +0000 UTC]
Well
Firestar xD
I think Sandstorm is a little bit lighter
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PotionLily In reply to SugarrCane [2013-07-04 16:19:36 +0000 UTC]
Yeah sandstorm is a tanish color
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tirathehedgehog [2012-07-11 05:08:49 +0000 UTC]
shouldnt have traced.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
BecauseWhyNot321 In reply to Dogostar-Adopts [2016-06-26 14:07:09 +0000 UTC]
Actually, it's ILLEGAL to trace without the owner's permission. So quit being a bitch. You sound like an immature 9 year old trying to sound cool on the internet. But you really just look like and idiot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
I-am-Ayla-Cat In reply to BecauseWhyNot321 [2016-10-29 13:01:13 +0000 UTC]
its only illegal if you violate rules involving copyright objects, not random images on the internet. For all you know, this could be a stock image and he/she used it for its intended purpose.
Also, I don't care how old this comment is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
traltor In reply to BecauseWhyNot321 [2016-07-08 04:45:59 +0000 UTC]
and somehow you look better by replying to a comment from 2 years ago?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
CuteKittyWiddy In reply to traltor [2016-07-08 07:19:56 +0000 UTC]
Haha. Too true. And it's illegal if there's a copyright mark on it. smh.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0