HOME | DD
VelkokneznaMaria β 4. Rani
Published: 2010-04-18 18:43:56 +0000 UTC; Views: 2346; Favourites: 26; Downloads: 37
Redirect to original
Description
Little colouring challenge - TOP 10 best Bollywood actresses ever (according to reddif.com). Picture of ten best Bollywood actresses completely re-coloured from black and white images.No. 4 - Rani Mukerji
To watch her dance [link]
Born in 1978, she made in 1997, but first success came with Karan Johar's romance Kuch Kuch Hota Hai (1998), her biggest hit so far, and won a Filmfare Best Supporting Actress Award for her performance in the film. She later starred in many films, most of which fared below expectations. She re-invented her image with the commercially and critically successful Saathiya (2002), for which she received numerous awards and nominations.
In 2004, her performances in the hit Hum Tum and the critically acclaimed Yuva earned her the Best Actress and the Best Supporting Actress awards at the Filmfare, making her the first actress to win two major awards in the same year. She received unanimous praise for her role as a deaf, dumb and blind girl in the film Black (2005), as well as many awards for her performance, establishing herself as a leading actress in Bollywood.
Related content
Comments: 18
fantastic work, you are really a specialist!
π: 0 β©: 1
And sometimes a masochist.
π: 0 β©: 0
All the detail is awesome! I'm seriously dieing to color again...(My laptop charger broke and photoshop is only on my laptop)
π: 0 β©: 0
But I don't suppose she actually is "deaf, dumb and blind", is she? If you had to wear hearing aids, would you cover them with your hair, and why?
π: 0 β©: 2
No, she isnΒ΄t deaf, dumb or blind
π: 0 β©: 0
No she's not actually. It's only in Black that she played Michelle McNally (her best performance ever), a character based upon the famous Helen Keller.
π: 0 β©: 1
Your reply doesn't surprise me... I get angry when I read about people who don't have disabilities/impairments taking the part of people who are supposed to have them. Not long ago in a British TV soap, there was this guy who was "seriously injured" in an explosion, and it left him (supposedly) needing a hearing aid. Not long after, the soap finished, and a little while later, the guy in the explosion got a part in another soap - and when you see him, he was not wearing a hearing aid. Crazy, or what?
π: 0 β©: 1
Well she's only an actress. Or do you wish her to be blind and deaf just to fit perfectly in the role. A mere example - when a movie narrates the story of a raped woman, are you angry when you learn that the actress wasn't raped in her real life? On the contrary.
She is an ACTRESS - and as an actress, she plays the role to the best of her abilities - whatever is her life, her way of life, her experiences, etc.
π: 0 β©: 1
I realise when a person appears in a fictional programme who is supposed to have been raped, in all probability, in real life, they won't have been - but I don't see why a person who has got a disability cannot take the part of a disabled person in a fictional programme. Would you expect a person who doesn't use a wheelchair in real life to take the part of somebody who does in a fictional programme, because I wouldn't!
π: 0 β©: 1
I would! If this person plays very well their role, then there is no problem for me.
Of course, a disabled person in real life may take the part of a disabled person in a fictional program. Nobody said the contrary. As a undisabled person may play the part of a disabled person. I don't see any difference in this - and I don't wanna see one because in both cases, those people are actors.
π: 0 β©: 0
Yeah, Rani! 
No one than her could have played better the deaf, dumb and blind Michelle McNally in Black. There is no word for her performance in that movie.
Lovely!
π: 0 β©: 1
I still have to wathc her in Black...
i know i'll love it..
π: 0 β©: 1
[link]
Specially for you! 
π: 0 β©: 1
Oh girl you're tempting me so much...I should be stuying!! LOL i'll do it as soon as pissible!!
π: 0 β©: 1
Haha, sorry. 
π: 0 β©: 1