HOME | DD
VictoriaLolo — I Can't
#1983 #1987 #83 #87 #bear #bite #bonnie #bonny #bunny #chick #chicka #chicken #diner #dinner #doodle #duck #family #five #fox #foxy #fred #fredbear #freddy #freddys #fright #golden #guy #man #nights #pirate #procreate #purple #spring #trap #fnaf #procreateapp #fazbear #springbonnie #foxythepirate #fredbearsfamilydiner #fazbearsfright #springtrap #freddbearsfamilydinner
Published: 2015-08-29 04:53:49 +0000 UTC; Views: 2033; Favourites: 20; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
A doodle.So what do you guys think about theory that the FNaF 4 kid is the Purple Guy's son?
and are the bullies the kids who end up possessing the animatronics?
If so, that means he killed his other son.
I think that would make a fantastic story.. But I'm not 100% sold yet.
i'm waiting to see if Game Theory can persuade me.
(I have a comic I would love to draw, but I need more facts.)
Thoughts?
Related content
Comments: 6
I like to think Purple guy has the HER disease.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I honestly love the theory and i think it really makes sense! I mean, first of all, murderers don't appear from one day to another. one does not simply wake up and say "i'm a psychopath from now on". there had to be some sort of trigger and considering FNaF4 was planned to be the last game, it would be good for scott to actually show why PG did what he did.
I actually think that maybe the crying child was PG's only son and the brother was his step-son. This would explain why the brother is mean to him (imagine that for your brother to be born, your parents had to get divorced or your dad had to die). if he were to be his step son, that could lead PG to liking him less and to actually be willing to kill him if his own son died because of him. that would also explain why the brothers are so different (i honestly could not tell they were brothers until night 5 minigame where he said it). well, even if the kids he killed were not the brother and the friends, he would have still gotten very emotionally unstable because of that.
well, it's also possible that PG and the child were close friends (like a father and son way). in this case, PG would have no reason to actually like the brother or his friends, in fact it would make it much easier to hate him even before the incident.
the silver eyes hasn't really proven this wrong. the crying child in fnaf4 or any of the incidents in the minigames were not mentioned at all (in fact, apparently they either never happened or everyone forgot about those) it's also (sort of) a separate story from the games (there are many parts that don't fit in with what the games showed). there is some crossover here and there, but the book is a reimagining.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh wow, thanks for the comment! It makes me happy when people wanna talk theories! Haha!
I personally think that if PG is the exact same character as William Afton, then he likely wouldn't have any kids.
The whole reason he started kidnapping and killing kids is because he was jealous of Henry (hence taking his son) and he somehow thought what he was doing was somehow loving them and making them his own family.
The argument could be made that his son died, and that's WHY he was jealous.
But if I have my facts straight, (and I'm honestly not 100% sure I do) the fnaf 4 location was not Fredbear's Family Diner, so it would have taken place AFTER William/Dave/PG took the first child (Sammy).
But there are still things that really still line up for me because, from what I make out from the games, the first child becomes the puppet.
Whereas in the book, it seems to me that Sammy (who is the first child) becomes Foxy.
(hence why he's alive and twitching while still in Henry's workshop. Plus there was that dream/memory scene with Henry and Foxy.)
So.. my point is.. I DON'T KNOW WHAT TO THINK RIGHT NOW ABOUT ANYTHING. I'm just going to enjoy it as long as Scott's dishing it out, because I'm just confusing myself. 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The story IS very confusing indeed!
I honestly think fnaf4's location is FFD since they got fredbear. I really don't know. well, but as scott said, the games and the book don't fit in like puzzle pieces. William's death was very different in the book than in the game, the murders were in 1985 too. those are not the only differences.
but i guess it is possible that the kid's death made him jealous of henry and/or emotionally unstable (PG and the kid could have been just close friends. they don't necessarily have to be father and son). again, serial killers don't just decide to become serial killers out of the blue. they got to have some motivation.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And then you read the theories that it's all a dream and that makes me want to just throw my laptop out a window. xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1