Comments: 22
doinitza [2009-09-28 18:49:26 +0000 UTC]
si mie imi place mai mult asa..e grozava oricum
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lil-Fxking-Angelz [2009-07-14 02:15:04 +0000 UTC]
I love this one. I have a huge thing with black and white photographs and this is by far one of the best i have seen. The buildings and clouds are so... beautiful. It gives it an abondoned and eerie look, if people werent there then it would look absolutely abondoned. Its totally breath taking for me. Good work.
xx
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lil-Fxking-Angelz In reply to vipergmc [2009-07-15 08:45:02 +0000 UTC]
Your welcome.
The people actually look fine. To me it looks like they are leaving their past behind and are going to make a new start to life. I rekon it would have looked better with them in it than with them not in it.
xx
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jumparoundjon In reply to vipergmc [2009-07-14 07:48:45 +0000 UTC]
I think a lot of this comes down to personal preferences.
For me, one of the things I dislike about hdr is that the range of contrast is sometimes over-exaggerated. I know hdr is about creating a greater range of tones and contrasts, but I feel it's often over-done and looks false. When this happens, it's nearly always the skies that look unreal, with huge contrasts.
There's a really thin line, for me, between using hdr to boost the avialable tones and contrasts, and creating a Frankenstein's monster of garish colours and highlights and shadows.
And that's the issue: some people love the "exaggerated hdr" and some, like me, don't care too much for it. I think you are a real hdr lover, and so you will, of course, prefer the mono version that looks more like the hdr original. I prefer more naturalistic-looking images, so I will tend to prefer something closer to what the camera, and the eye, actually visualised!
Of course, the best thing of all is that we can have such different views and preferences, but still respect and enjoy each other's work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vipergmc In reply to jumparoundjon [2009-07-14 13:12:44 +0000 UTC]
I totally agree with your opinions.
I believe I tend to go with the "eye-catchers" most of the time. That's what I look for first in a picture...basically that its elements work together to please the eye.
I suppose that target can be achieved with both hdr and non-hdr images. Surely, sometimes hdr can stray away from photography, into the surreal-look realm that verges on "love it or hate it", but I guess either way is ok if it brings something to the table.
The raw shot of this scene looked hopelessly flat and of course held no details whatsoever in the sky. With that impression in mind, I started looking for numerous ways to increase the contrast, which was the main problem. I'm guessing it basically comes down to this, as, after much consideration, I decided I like the "punchier" look, especially as I'm attracted to many "heavy" black-and-white photos that I've seen here on dA.
That is to say, I was afraid to reduce contrast as I saw it basically removed texture "sharpness" on the left walls and the ground.
Either way, there's quite a big difference between what the eye saw, and what the camera saw... Of course, I respect your naturalistic preferences, yet I feel the need to "push" the camera a bit, to record the image that I have in my mind at a certain moment
👍: 0 ⏩: 1