HOME | DD

noirart23 In reply to PenofGold [2012-04-05 22:30:15 +0000 UTC]

*snicker* If you're talking about the girl, then you're an idiot. She's has boobs doesn't she? And what exactly do you think those are composed of lol? Air?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

JoeGP In reply to noirart23 [2012-10-18 18:44:22 +0000 UTC]

well they're sure as hell not made of fat [link]
this is what happens when you skip school

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

noirart23 In reply to JoeGP [2012-10-18 21:21:09 +0000 UTC]

From your source (wikipedia):
"the milk-glands-to-*fat* ratio is 1:1 in a non-lactating woman. In addition to the milk glands, the breast also is composed of connective tissues, white fat,"
"The Breast: cross-section scheme of the mammary gland.
1. Chest wall
2. Pectoralis muscles
3. Lobules
4. Nipple
5. Areola
6. Milk duct
7. Fatty tissue<-(In biology, adipose tissue or body fat or fat depot or just fat)
8. Skin"

Other sources: - ©Copyright: UBM Medica Australia, 2000-2012.

"Women’s breasts are made up of fat, nipple, glands (alveoli) and a network of ducts through which milk can pass from the glands to the nipples."
"The spaces around the lobes and ducts are filled with fatty tissue and ligaments. The size of a non-lactating breast is largely determined by the amount of fat it contains as the gland structure is not that well developed."


... damn. Looks like you got me. Guess there really is no fat in breasts uh? Please, feel free to disagree with both your own sources and health articles. If you still arn't convinced, i could always send you my university bio book

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JoeGP In reply to noirart23 [2012-10-18 23:09:49 +0000 UTC]

From your own quote "the milk-glands-to-*fat* ratio is 1:1" ... so you skipped out on math class as well such a bad girl
Let me translate, it means they are only half fat at best. i never said they didn't contain fat.
Oh and i "love" your sarcastic reply, thankfully i don't have to disagree with anything, bye now

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

noirart23 In reply to JoeGP [2012-10-19 00:28:06 +0000 UTC]

Well, since you're being so... precise, I'll point out that the original comment to which I replied said, "nice body, no fat." Thus, I pointed out that breasts have fat in them. The word I used, in fact, was composed. By composed, I meant that fat are parts of the whole, being the breasts. So no need to translate. I never said that they contained only fat. I "love" how you noticed how I named all the other parts that compose breasts. I'm glad you enjoyed my sarcasm and even more thankful that you've decided there's no need to disagree with anything. Bye to you too!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JoeGP In reply to noirart23 [2012-10-19 08:34:56 +0000 UTC]

remind me next time never to talk to anyone who call's complete strangers idiot, they are usually talking about themselves

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

noirart23 In reply to JoeGP [2012-10-19 21:20:59 +0000 UTC]

Yeah. I mean who goes around commenting on a finished conversation almost 7 months old between two people they don't know, for the simple purpose of calling a complete stranger uneducated and implying that they lack intelligence? Completely ridiculous. Why, no one would do something like that. It's so pointless!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PenofGold In reply to noirart23 [2012-04-05 22:38:56 +0000 UTC]

jealous?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

noirart23 In reply to PenofGold [2012-04-05 22:53:41 +0000 UTC]

Of her boobs?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PenofGold In reply to noirart23 [2012-04-06 00:07:48 +0000 UTC]

sure

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

noirart23 In reply to PenofGold [2012-04-06 01:47:48 +0000 UTC]

Meh. W/e. I'm not arguing with an opinion. I was just pointing it out. It's a nice picture. There. Done.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PenofGold In reply to noirart23 [2012-04-06 01:57:28 +0000 UTC]

uh huh sure. that's all you're saying.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0