HOME | DD

walker1812 — Shanna: One

Published: 2008-09-07 07:24:05 +0000 UTC; Views: 1333; Favourites: 19; Downloads: 131
Redirect to original
Description Model: Shanna
Related content
Comments: 33

Platinum-Roze [2008-09-09 21:32:10 +0000 UTC]

This has been featured here: [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

walker1812 In reply to Platinum-Roze [2008-09-10 00:33:02 +0000 UTC]

thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

palleas [2008-09-09 09:53:54 +0000 UTC]

love the eyes, love the framing, love the dof. It's ture that the un-even make up below the eyes is weird, but what struck me more was the mouth. Somehow it's weird, but I don't know why...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

walker1812 In reply to palleas [2008-09-09 09:54:47 +0000 UTC]

cause she is smirking at you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

palleas In reply to walker1812 [2008-09-09 10:09:07 +0000 UTC]

well, maybe, but I like to think I'm not that childish ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

walker1812 In reply to palleas [2008-09-09 10:11:52 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DiomedesZX [2008-09-08 19:14:39 +0000 UTC]

50 mm, 2.0? Really? Hmmm.... Gorgeous shot.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

walker1812 In reply to DiomedesZX [2008-09-08 22:12:30 +0000 UTC]

thanks... it's a f/1.4 prime 50mm one of my favorite lenses.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

palleas In reply to walker1812 [2008-09-09 09:51:59 +0000 UTC]

one of my next purchase!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

walker1812 In reply to palleas [2008-09-09 09:54:23 +0000 UTC]

I recommend it...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

palleas In reply to walker1812 [2008-09-09 09:54:44 +0000 UTC]

well, you don't have to convince me, just my bank account ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

walker1812 In reply to palleas [2008-09-09 09:56:28 +0000 UTC]

hmm, well it is pricey... you could get the f/1.6 or the f/1.8 but well that f/1.4 is great... the glass is so sharp... try them out.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

palleas In reply to walker1812 [2008-09-09 10:07:58 +0000 UTC]

It's actually not that expensive for a good lens. Well I'm talking about the sony lens. The only thing I'm worried about is its optical resolution...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

walker1812 In reply to palleas [2008-09-09 10:09:27 +0000 UTC]

ok, explain 'optical resolution' to me again? I can define the two words separately but together my mind isn't working... but then it is really early here. lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

palleas In reply to walker1812 [2008-09-09 10:20:22 +0000 UTC]

well, the actual resolving power of the lens, idependantly on the sensor you put behind. It's usually defined in angle : what angle has got to be in between to objects for the lens to be able to make two seperates images of these objects. What I actually would love to have is a MTF curve, but I can't find it, yet. Found one for a 50mm F1.4 canon and another for the sigma lens, but not for the sony lens :/

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

walker1812 In reply to palleas [2008-09-09 11:41:39 +0000 UTC]

i think i need to go learn more... damn... i just take pictures. lol.... but i do like my f/1.4

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

palleas In reply to walker1812 [2008-09-09 11:47:17 +0000 UTC]

I don't think you need to learn more. The point is just, for example : on the kit lens I have, when I watch the picture at 100% size, at pixel level, it's blurred a bit, and that's probably due to the resolution of the lens. I just want lenses that are better than the sensor ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

walker1812 In reply to palleas [2008-09-09 12:03:23 +0000 UTC]

don't' make me start getting camera and lens envy from other people. lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

palleas In reply to walker1812 [2008-09-09 13:12:54 +0000 UTC]

hey! you're the one who got me envious ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

walker1812 In reply to palleas [2008-09-09 13:15:10 +0000 UTC]

well i didn't know about optical resolution and all that... I just liked the DoF options with the 1.4 and the low light ability.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

palleas In reply to walker1812 [2008-09-09 13:33:21 +0000 UTC]

now I'm beginning to taunt and all

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

walker1812 In reply to palleas [2008-09-10 02:02:12 +0000 UTC]

You are cruel lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

palleas In reply to walker1812 [2008-09-10 08:39:36 +0000 UTC]

I know I know ^^

but well, YOU have the lens, so who's taunting who indeed ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

walker1812 In reply to palleas [2008-09-10 08:41:04 +0000 UTC]

well, next time we hang out I'll lend it to you...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

palleas In reply to walker1812 [2008-09-10 08:44:14 +0000 UTC]

so very kind of you ^^

I think new time we hand out, I'll have my own (which will have the tremendous quality of actually fitting on my camera )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

walker1812 In reply to palleas [2008-09-10 08:50:00 +0000 UTC]

oh you want one that fits on YOUR camera? Oh yeah, well that I can't help y ou with... I was just going to let you hold mine lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

palleas In reply to walker1812 [2008-09-10 08:53:35 +0000 UTC]

so very generous of you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

palleas In reply to walker1812 [2008-09-09 13:32:21 +0000 UTC]

well it's good, for the resolution will not be so very good at 1.4 ^^
I reckon the best resolution you'll get will be around f/4

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

walker1812 In reply to palleas [2008-09-10 02:02:25 +0000 UTC]

I'll try it...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mleitner [2008-09-07 14:27:05 +0000 UTC]

I really like this one. The makeup under her eyes is uneven, but that's the MUA's fault. Awesome shot. Really.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

walker1812 In reply to mleitner [2008-09-07 15:09:27 +0000 UTC]

not my favorite MUA but the one that was given to me... she does pretty good hair though

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mleitner In reply to walker1812 [2008-09-07 18:45:33 +0000 UTC]

Still excellent

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

walker1812 In reply to mleitner [2008-09-07 21:50:32 +0000 UTC]

ty

👍: 0 ⏩: 0