Comments: 21
HosedMan [2007-07-19 19:11:30 +0000 UTC]
So I don't get FLAMED right away, (as I have before) :
"comments and critiques are very much appreciated"
the ugly copyright ruins the picture.
it's too intrusive to even begin to evaluate the work itself.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wandeclayt In reply to suicidal-kisses [2006-07-05 23:01:20 +0000 UTC]
hard to believe... but they painted the wall!!
ruined my background!! and I had plans to shot there again!!
but don't mind! there are plenty of other places for you to pose!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wandeclayt In reply to suicidal-kisses [2006-07-06 16:37:31 +0000 UTC]
that's the worst part... they painted it with propaganda!
and it looks awful!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Paraddox [2006-06-26 17:13:01 +0000 UTC]
to reduce the noise you could have used ISO200 and a longer exposure time because the model is not in such an inconfortable position that she can't be still for a couple of seconds... and the background is not moving also....
besides the noise ...looks great
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wandeclayt In reply to dizzz [2006-06-26 01:34:07 +0000 UTC]
oh! I took this around 6am. sun rises at 7h30 this time of year...
the yellow light comes from the sodium bulbs of the street lights... i've enhanced it a bit. but it was really just a bit.
i plan to shoot there again... love the graphs on the walls on this street.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lightwaveuser [2006-06-25 03:33:52 +0000 UTC]
Wow! she is so hot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sunflowerwithpower [2006-06-25 00:25:25 +0000 UTC]
I think the grainyness adds to it. There's no need to apologize.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wandeclayt In reply to Sunflowerwithpower [2006-06-26 03:17:19 +0000 UTC]
I must admit I have a crush on grainy pics, but a ISO 1000 camera would make me really happy!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wandeclayt In reply to Swatmax [2006-06-26 01:35:22 +0000 UTC]
classy and provocative are her last names!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
satanicarmysoldier [2006-06-24 21:34:23 +0000 UTC]
I like this image but the stuff underneath the females bottom is a little out of place. But to each his own.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wandeclayt In reply to satanicarmysoldier [2006-06-26 01:36:24 +0000 UTC]
she was wearing an overcoat... and that's what she's sitting on top... guess it would look better without it. I agree with you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
satanicarmysoldier In reply to Wandeclayt [2006-06-26 23:57:11 +0000 UTC]
HEHE, never thought an innocent observational comment would possibly mean anything. Wandeclayt, keep in mind my comment was only one persons thoughts on the photo. So, please don't take anything I say or will possibly say about your art as harsh. Thank You.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wandeclayt In reply to satanicarmysoldier [2006-06-27 02:40:54 +0000 UTC]
well... I do take every comment into account. not meaning that I would actually change my art because of them... but knowing how other people interpret my view always adds a lot. these innocent impressions the DA viewers express are often more valuable then any other critiques I may listen to at the actual exhibitions.
and just as I mentioned, I agree with what you said about the pic...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0