HOME | DD

wwwarea — I Hate Bias

#bias #logic #stamp #unfair #argument
Published: 2014-09-01 08:14:18 +0000 UTC; Views: 1435; Favourites: 22; Downloads: 2
Redirect to original
Description

Note: Sometimes I may have done similar things, not sure. But I do try a lot.

Bias:
prejudice in favor of or against one thing, person, or group compared with another, usually in a way considered to be unfair.


If anyone is confused, "bias" doesn't always mean "personal opinion" or just "opinion" it's self.. It's often about being unfair. However, personal opinion is often included.

If I sent a bunch of studies, links, or compare (I try), and the guy replies "bullsh*t" and that's it, then what's the point of arguing? He/She failed to argue further and probably refused to learn anything new.
I had issues like this with the "wolves are equal as humans" stamp (A anti-speciesism point) and I had to disable the comments because it was just pointless (Same problems). No, I didn't censor my self much, I still leave the info out. It's just the comments.
Oh and by the way, most of the comments were bad, most of them..

Another f***ed up example is a guy who wrote about me in journals and wrote one of the most biased info I've seen about me. Called me names, brings out everything (or most) I defend as a flaw, and probably laughs. The guy even used terms like "white knight" and "butthurt" as if that made his "argument" "better". I remember making a stamp about "white knighting", and suggested that "standing up for things" is never bad no matter how "frowned upon" it is by some people.
He/She was probably blinded by people's personal beliefs about many things, and he never backed up anything.
Also, I thought bringing people's names out on DA like this was banned? Oh well..?
I also argued against him on my own journal, and as I guess: He failed. You can look at it here:
comments.deviantart.com/1/4788…
Could of swear he decided to not look at any links I offered. Oh well..?





Well then? What should be the real winner here? People with comparing, logic, and sense? Or people with personal bias feelings as "logic" (and maybe filled with hatred) that serves no value to this dying world?

Logic, and loving tolerance will always win.

Oh and yes, there may be a "moral side" thing.. And I mean the basics.. The Golden Rule (The one I like) or the non-golden rule: Types of people who promotes hate/intolerance, censorship, and other negatives.



There may be a very sad fact, it's very hard (but possible) to change people.
Deviant Art is one of the worst places to argue because many people here will look down against logic and arguments filled with souls.

_______________________________

Stamp Templatewww.deviantart.com/#/art/Stamp…

Related content
Comments: 11

DawnFelix [2019-09-12 20:47:40 +0000 UTC]

Honestly, people, these days are just stubborn and sensitive snowflakes that can't argue for shit.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JealousMilk [2015-02-25 21:46:42 +0000 UTC]

Me being a person fond of discussing and argumenting... whenever me and my friend argue i try bringing facts to the table. It eventually makes her annoyed and when she gets annoyed she gets really bitchy.. and when she's like that i get ANGRY, because she won't try proving her opinion. She says she doesn't want to, and still wants her opinion to be correct... She won't look me in the eye either when argumenting, so i get even more mad... D: This is what angers me...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Channeleven [2014-09-05 14:16:21 +0000 UTC]

Alright, I'll admit that I like some stuff that people hates, however, when it comes to Sonic.EXE, it ish't THAT salvagable. It's plagued with negative cliches that reenforce why people no longer enouy Creepypastas. As for my journals (whether you'd believe me or not), I leave links to comments, deviations and journals that reflect on why /the person I'm talking about needs to be adressed. They're (at times) bullies or bigots themselves. Just because it's hard to make something original, that doesn't mean that one can't try to make something original. If one tries, they can make something valuable. So go ahead, claim that I worhsip the "cult of originality", it's my opinion.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wwwarea In reply to Channeleven [2014-09-06 03:09:10 +0000 UTC]

At least you are trying to argue on this maybe.


No, I mean, it just means that those people can ignore them and enjoy other creepypastas that does match there own needs. I don't think using someone's personal opinion about Sonic.EXE makes the argument legit about the thing it's self. It's as calling an anime movie horrible because some anime haters couldn't control it.. Blame the people who chooses to keep complaining about the thing just because it wasn't there style.
Negative? It was probably the point though, as it's one of those "scary things" some people enjoyed a while ago, which probably inspired the artist to make it, for those kinds of people.
See, if the game was hated by the targeted audiences, then maybe it does suck.. But it seems that the targeted audiences enjoyed it - It counts because media and critique often covers about the purpose of an artist.
The real problem that needs targeted is to teach the wrong type of people who can't seem to realize there own selves, which would be the haters.

The "originality" part:
I don't think it means people should try if they don't want to. Lot's of the times people try to be way "too new", the work ends up not being as interesting by a lot of audiences, and destroys the new possibilities that the artist would wanted to make if the artist "thinks" they must be "original" just because some other people think so.
Though, if the artist wanted to make it that way, then it's not a problem it's self.. Same goes for the opposite.
As I said, if some people don't like that a work is a genre rather than something more alien, then they should realize themselves that it's not there kind of style.
I as an audience love the video game "A Hat in Time" or "Lobodestroyo" and didn't try the whole "cult of originality" thing as it would destroy what they wanted to do.. It would destroy the "new result" as a whole.. Which is still new because it's something I still never seen before.

Man, I feel sad that your links and arguments are only based off DA comments and only DA, but then again of course, that doesn't mean it's automatically going to be wrong as some comments can make good points but from what I can guess based off a small theory, it's going to be more biased or stuff that's already been covered from outside of DA often..
I can try to look at some of those links. If I can find them from you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Channeleven In reply to wwwarea [2014-09-06 03:11:08 +0000 UTC]

Alright, though I stil dislike EXE, and that's my own opinion.

Ok.

The behavior is limited to DA.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wwwarea In reply to Channeleven [2014-09-06 19:36:28 +0000 UTC]

Yeah you don't have to like it, it wasn't much of my intention to make people who personality didn't like it, my intention was to argue people who tries "legit/critique" arguing based off that. : P One of the major problems was that one guy who keeps hiding my comments every time I criticized the person back.

I'm a bit confused on the "behavior" thing, I don't think it's limited, you can totally send people links and arguments that are based outside of DA.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Channeleven In reply to wwwarea [2014-09-06 19:41:27 +0000 UTC]

Alright.

At times, the people I cover are only on DA and no other site. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

peacefulinvasion [2014-09-02 03:22:33 +0000 UTC]

I cannot argue but i'm staying.  

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wwwarea In reply to peacefulinvasion [2014-09-02 03:24:53 +0000 UTC]

I think I mean in a debate or any other kind of argument I think. lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

peacefulinvasion In reply to wwwarea [2014-09-02 14:35:46 +0000 UTC]

I knows but I like being ironic and disobediant

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wwwarea In reply to peacefulinvasion [2014-09-03 03:11:46 +0000 UTC]

Ha. xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0