HOME | DD

ximo — Lunapark

Published: 2006-08-29 02:55:29 +0000 UTC; Views: 944; Favourites: 24; Downloads: 10
Redirect to original
Description Set from Sydney Cityscape series: Lunapark

..and some motion
Related content
Comments: 15

nobrantan [2007-09-21 08:15:14 +0000 UTC]

perfect shot !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ximo In reply to nobrantan [2007-09-21 13:07:53 +0000 UTC]

Thannks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

johonbravo [2007-06-09 01:56:16 +0000 UTC]

thats really sweet! good idea

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ximo In reply to johonbravo [2007-06-09 09:12:20 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. Old idea although I didn't know

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ScorchedTears [2007-06-08 09:21:57 +0000 UTC]

Lunar Park was an awesome place. Wish it was still there... Amazing photo

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ximo In reply to ScorchedTears [2007-06-09 09:13:40 +0000 UTC]

What do you mean, it is still there..?
Thx for comment.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ScorchedTears In reply to ximo [2007-06-10 07:25:13 +0000 UTC]

It isn't there anymore..

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

couleur [2006-08-31 10:18:03 +0000 UTC]

perfect exposure and a superb use of camera. But after retouches plays an important roll.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ximo In reply to couleur [2006-08-31 12:43:07 +0000 UTC]

Thank you. Yes, retouching is often neccessary, not in this case though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Selciveos [2006-08-29 03:02:43 +0000 UTC]

how fast is that going? must of been a long shot maybe? or is that a fast ride?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ximo In reply to Selciveos [2006-08-29 03:13:17 +0000 UTC]

..some 20 seconds or similar. It cannot turn very fast - people in there

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Selciveos In reply to ximo [2006-08-29 03:19:19 +0000 UTC]

thought it was a long drawn photo, i've done that, but it usually makes the image completely white.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ximo In reply to Selciveos [2006-08-29 10:34:26 +0000 UTC]

Stop the camera down to small apreture (>F8). Or you can use ND filter, but that wasn't neccessary in this case.

White means overexposed. So either stop the lens down or use faster time.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Selciveos In reply to ximo [2006-08-29 16:08:12 +0000 UTC]

ah, ok, I'm still kind of newbish when using my camera, and it probally doesn't have all the effects of your camera, mines a 300 dollar camera, I'm guessing yours is a little more pricey

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ximo In reply to Selciveos [2006-08-29 22:56:56 +0000 UTC]

Uhm, 5K.. but again, it is my profession. Effects.. are not important, I shoot always manual when creating art.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0