HOME | DD

yoult β€” Spinosauridae 02

Published: 2011-09-09 18:27:57 +0000 UTC; Views: 4245; Favourites: 91; Downloads: 48
Redirect to original
Description Suchomimus tenerensis based on the rigorous skeletal reconstruction of MNN GDF 500 and 501 made by Scott Hartman (see here and here ).
Related content
Comments: 13

lythronax-argestes [2017-12-09 06:52:12 +0000 UTC]

Are you aware that this piece has been used to illustrate a hoax article?Β  dinopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Lante…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

yoult In reply to lythronax-argestes [2017-12-10 01:49:36 +0000 UTC]

Oh man, those asshats. Thank you for bringing this to my attention!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PaleoJoe [2012-06-23 21:01:41 +0000 UTC]

How do do you do such detailed feathers(protofeathers).

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

yoult In reply to PaleoJoe [2013-03-12 22:20:18 +0000 UTC]

Not sure if you're serious about that question... but just use tiny strokes, like you want to draw fur or short hair.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PaleoJoe In reply to yoult [2013-03-15 03:12:52 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheLOAD [2011-11-20 02:13:18 +0000 UTC]

Love the feathers, Personally, I believe that all dinosaur groups would have some kind of feather like stucture.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

felipe-elias [2011-09-11 16:51:18 +0000 UTC]

Lovely color pattern!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DiNoDrAwEr [2011-09-10 11:04:15 +0000 UTC]

With their plumage these spinosaurids look so... dunno... "cute" ^^
Very nice, though

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

yoult In reply to DiNoDrAwEr [2011-09-10 12:07:49 +0000 UTC]

Danke, aber du musst mit mir nicht englisch reden

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DiNoDrAwEr In reply to yoult [2011-09-10 13:17:42 +0000 UTC]

xD ups, stimmt da war was... egal, so verstehen es der nicht-deutschsprachige Rest auch noch...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RickCharlesOfficial [2011-09-10 05:23:59 +0000 UTC]

I'm very curious to know why you're pluming your spinosaurids. I can't say I agree with it, but it is a very interesting take on them!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

yoult In reply to RickCharlesOfficial [2011-09-10 08:38:23 +0000 UTC]

Besides Irritator (who has more protofeathers) and Spinosaurus (who has no feathers) I only plumaged the neck-region. This plumage is just imagination.
But I think there are good reasons why they could have it: Till today there speaks nothing against protofeathering in basal Theropoda or even Saurischia when we look to Concavenator who was as wide away from the Maniraptorians as the Spinosauridae.
Also as analogs to modern bears (sure, bears are smaller than some of them, but I'm not sure with the weight) and all piscivorous birds a furry head and neck has no disadvantages for fishing. And there are also the lions I call into play. We can see on male lions a thick mane, wich is not only for attraction but rather protect the neck and throat from punches and scratches - and now imagine what nasty violations they could've made with those claws and the very thin spinosaurid-neck without a mane (also useful for protection against other dinosaurs - oh my, I must think of those vintage thumb-killing Iguanodots ).

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RickCharlesOfficial In reply to yoult [2011-09-11 03:29:56 +0000 UTC]

For a while, I was actually leaning towards a "basal protofeathering" in my speculative paleoart as well. But more recently I've backed out of that, though some remnants still exist in my gallery such as my protofeathered dilophosaurids.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0