Comments: 5
Captain-Marmote [2013-12-30 10:38:02 +0000 UTC]
Interesting, I've not seen the dual iso used really (i've not really looked but still!) How does this image compare to a straight image? the results look good here, but a bit soft around the finer details of the tree, ii assume from the NR. looking good though, its challenging doing this type of work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Youmitori In reply to Captain-Marmote [2014-01-17 09:01:37 +0000 UTC]
oh it was a foggy night too .. atleast in the vally . and i tested the Dual iso for Nights a little more and have to say i was right! no dark exposures with that one
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Captain-Marmote In reply to Youmitori [2014-01-17 12:02:29 +0000 UTC]
So your best advice would be to stick to a traditional long exposure for dark nights, if i understood correctly?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Youmitori In reply to Captain-Marmote [2014-01-17 21:18:24 +0000 UTC]
yea! because if you use Dual Iso you have to take that long exposure anyway and you reduce the the pixels you can actualy use by half. Im getting good results with Canons integrated Noise reduction for Single shots. But i turn it off if i will stack the pictures in some kind of way.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Youmitori In reply to Captain-Marmote [2013-12-30 15:53:03 +0000 UTC]
True i used lightroom to decrease noise.
I have to say that dual iso in my thought is nothing for night /long exposures.
ok you can use it for moving twilight. but maybe if you have a very fast glas.
have to test that next time
👍: 0 ⏩: 0