HOME | DD

yyellowbird — birmingham1982 by-nc-sa

Published: 2009-02-06 01:32:40 +0000 UTC; Views: 2082; Favourites: 75; Downloads: 66
Redirect to original
Description now shooting in RAW format. i'm not entirely sure what that means, but i was told it was a good idea. this also means larger sized images! available upon request.
Related content
Comments: 16

robertlubov [2009-02-07 02:15:39 +0000 UTC]

great work! how to add the grains?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

yyellowbird In reply to robertlubov [2009-02-07 05:47:47 +0000 UTC]

just the "add noise" tool in photoshop. :]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

robertlubov In reply to yyellowbird [2009-02-08 02:38:23 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KARAS05 [2009-02-07 00:09:26 +0000 UTC]

amazing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FelixMcCat [2009-02-06 05:47:23 +0000 UTC]

Oh yeah,
RAW = digital negative
You can make a heck of a lot more adjustments without losing image quality among other things.
Easier to work with exposure in post-processing and such.

And bigger file size, like you said

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FelixMcCat [2009-02-06 05:43:58 +0000 UTC]

vurrie nice!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Thom-Clarence [2009-02-06 02:39:55 +0000 UTC]

i got tuberculosis from that position, be careful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cre-dia [2009-02-06 02:23:54 +0000 UTC]

i love maria taylor, and i love the over all mood of this piece. fits the title and that song well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kkriminal [2009-02-06 02:16:52 +0000 UTC]

you could get tuberculosis in that position, be careful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ohsostarryeyed [2009-02-06 01:57:40 +0000 UTC]

basically, i love this. the colours are insane, and the lighting is stunning

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

goodbyeafterglow [2009-02-06 01:43:14 +0000 UTC]

raw sounds good. especially capitalized. i like it. the "RAW" and the picture

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

APaperFaceOnParade [2009-02-06 01:40:51 +0000 UTC]

oh, and is this a high ISO? it looks grainy.. or was that on purpose?? either way, beautiful image!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

yyellowbird In reply to APaperFaceOnParade [2009-02-06 02:28:14 +0000 UTC]

yeah, usually a lot of grain is added when i'm doing my postwork. thankyou. :]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

APaperFaceOnParade [2009-02-06 01:39:59 +0000 UTC]

yes.. raw is good! haha. raw image = more possibilities!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

derelict-heart [2009-02-06 01:35:02 +0000 UTC]

there are no words for this other than beautiful.
i always love the post-processing you do.
and yes, RAW is good... if you have software like adobe lightroom, you can edit the actual image, even change how the image was taken, if that makes sense. you can't do that with a JPEG. sorry, i'm rambling...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

yyellowbird In reply to derelict-heart [2009-02-06 02:29:02 +0000 UTC]

yes, that's what i've been learning! it does seem like a much more flexible file type than jpeg. and i've heard it's better for printing too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0