Comments: 23
9fanforever9909 [2016-05-25 00:41:44 +0000 UTC]
I like Soulbonding the best.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
13thefreerunner [2016-04-16 16:09:51 +0000 UTC]
There is also 's non talismatic pregnancy
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
AskThe-OCs [2016-03-28 07:51:35 +0000 UTC]
omg I thought this fandom died ;u; I am glad it's not
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ZADRpunk In reply to AskThe-OCs [2016-03-28 08:28:05 +0000 UTC]
It's gone a little quiet over the years but, I still enjoy it greatly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AskThe-OCs In reply to ZADRpunk [2016-03-28 12:10:41 +0000 UTC]
I think it's like a once a year thing like they come back on 9-9
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LonelySoulPunk [2016-03-05 18:49:44 +0000 UTC]
As one of the only people apparently using body into world theory, XD, I shall reassure you!... Or, well, I'll assure you of my theory because I don't know anyone else who uses it.
In the current theory I am using, damage to the baby's body while in the parent will at worst cause the baby's soul to reject the body. Thus the baby's soul will still be alive, but the body will have to be fixed properly and put back in to finish fusing. The normal pregnancy lasts about two months, but when a body is damaged it may cause pregnancy to last longer.
Babies naturally learn to go quiet around a threat in an instinctual way, which helps with Beast attacks. Though it usually isn't common practice to take a baby outside unless it is safe and it is guarded. A fortunate thing is that Beasts usually go for the adults, overlooking the young ones because their size lessens how much they are noticed and lowers their appearance as a visual threat.
Baby Stitchpunks are also adorable. XD
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
ZADRpunk In reply to LonelySoulPunk [2016-03-06 02:56:03 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the information. So in a way, your theory is more or less to protect the soul of the young at all costs huh? Interesting. Does that mean that until being put into a body the babies soul is possible at danger at any time?
I have to confess that the only reason I am so curious is because of liking stitchpup babies myself but can't seem to find a fan theory that I like enough to use fully. Yours is interesting in the idea of the body being inside the parent which would allow the parents to feel their baby moving and such but also the way pups go quite from danger is just plain smart.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ZeeWerecat [2016-02-27 03:28:20 +0000 UTC]
For the same sex soul-bonding thing: my thoughts on that is the submissive one is would be the one to conceive. Male or female, it doesn't matter. If both parties are the same gender the one on bottom gets pregnant.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ZADRpunk In reply to ZeeWerecat [2016-02-27 03:49:05 +0000 UTC]
And, what if there is no directly submissive partner? Some couples, same or opposite take turns as the dominant one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ZADRpunk In reply to ZeeWerecat [2016-02-27 04:14:40 +0000 UTC]
Eh. It was just a thought. Like the paper says, I've seen same-sex pairings before having kids; most people just won't defend why they can't.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MetaLatias5 In reply to ZADRpunk [2016-02-27 22:11:25 +0000 UTC]
the way werecatkid17 described it is actually how I always used it before
for example, I have an OC who's pretty much always dominant, but on one specific occasion in a roleplay he was forced into it by another OC and held back throughout because he didn't want it and because of this he was the submissive one in that specific situation and ended up pregnant for the first and only time (that other OC was female btw, since I never differ between male or female souls either, to me stitchpunks are only gendered by their voice)
I always imagined it that way that the more dominant soul is thrusting into the less dominant one in a way and so in the end leaves a bit of itself inside the others soul, this tiny bit of a soul mixes with the soul of the receiver and so forms the beginning of the childs soul which from then on grows inside that stitchpunks body, connected to the mother soul until it's big and stable enough to be moved into its own body
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ZADRpunk In reply to MetaLatias5 [2016-02-27 23:53:41 +0000 UTC]
Wow. That's actually very helpful to me; thank you. Sorry to whatever character of your was forced into something like that but, its nice to hear I'm not the only one that doesn't really see a difference between stitchpunk genders other than voices. Again, thanks for your input here.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ZADRpunk In reply to MetaLatias5 [2016-02-28 01:50:28 +0000 UTC]
Sadly, so do I alot of the time. I'm kinda a sadistic writer when getting into conflicts and usually 'play' with my favorite characters the hardest.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MetaLatias5 In reply to ZADRpunk [2016-02-28 04:53:06 +0000 UTC]
don't be sorry about it, it's ok to be sadistic with fictional characters, a lot of people find that fun
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ZADRpunk In reply to MetaLatias5 [2016-02-28 04:55:15 +0000 UTC]
^///^ Thanks. I seriously only do it like I said with my favorite characters.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0