HOME | DD

ZADRpunk — Stitchpunk Breeding Theories?
#shaneacker9 #stitchpunks #stitchpups #soulbondingstitcgpunks
Published: 2016-02-27 03:20:37 +0000 UTC; Views: 2878; Favourites: 28; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Breeding theories for Stitchpunks

Alright. So, as the title indicates I’m a bit curious of the theory of stitchpunks, ragdolls or whatever we wise to call them having babies. I already know that most fans call them ‘stitchpups’ or ‘stitchlings’ which I find cute as a button but, there seems to be multiple ways in which fans have thought of how this miracle of creation may happen. I’m here asking you as the fans, to please tell me which of these theories seems to most likely to work or even HOW they work. I’ve tried and tried, done a lot of research and even tried looking this up on the forum. But, I still need some guidance.

Please, read through these tops theories I have found that I like or see as the most often used and given me your thoughts back. I just want to see what a majority of fans feel here and really could use the help. So, without further ado…the theories I see as the most possible but still could use some help understanding.

Theory #1 – Soulbonding

This appears as the most often used method among fans as to how their character breed and got pregnant. The whole idea seems to stem on two stitchpunks becoming intimate with another and than merging their souls together by means of opening themselves up and going through action much like how we humans do. I see no problem with this and actually feel it’s fairly cute as a means of stitchpunks being able to express their love in a more…physical way.

However, there seems to be split here as to just who can get pregnant and how the pregnancy works from here. Some fans have it where only females can get pregnant by this well saying that males can’t even if they were to do the action as well. Others say it works both ways and that two males bonding in this manner could lead to pregnancy as well. Now, I’m not against same sex pairings. In fact, I support them deeply as a ally for equal rights. But like some I find it hard to separate the line between why this can work for females and a male but not a male and another male; or even two females. What’s the difference?

Stitchpunks in general aren’t very divided on the sexes given that the only differences between a male and female is normally a voice. Yes, SOME ocs are obviously masculine or feminine in design but aren’t the bodies more or less the same? And for that matter, what even determines the sex of a stitchpunk other than voice? I personally feel that your soul does not have a gender because up until it gets a body, it’s just a soul. Our bodies are merely the vessel that holds them well here on earth. The souls themselves don’t really hold a gender in my opinion. That having been said, I just find it funny that so many fans are narrow minded to this method of reproduction for a stitchpunk if they can’t define why it only works for females OR, why is could work for all genders. If you have a thought on this, please comment below and explain it to me.

Now, that having been typed, there seems to be another dividing line between this theory among fans other than just the sex of the parents. It also comes down to HOW the pregnancy and ‘birth’ of the pup goes as well. I’ll explain in the next part below…

Process #1 – Soul into Body

This particular one seems to be the ‘favorite’ or most often used method among the fans to get their stitchpunks into parenthood. It begins as listed before; two stitchpunks soulbond and one of them becomes pregnant. From here however, it seems that the baby or infants soul most mature inside its parent for a certain amount of time (I’m figuring one to three months) before it can be ‘separated’ into a body of its own.

Now, some fans have it where the only sign of the character being pregnant is a green glow to the pregnant stitchpunks body well others actually have their characters going through normal pregnancy like symptoms including the pregnant individual getting bigger and bigger in the middle until birth occurs. I myself prefer the first of these two simply because I don’t see WHY a new soul inside the parent would cause the stitchpunk to become bigger like that. If anyone can explain why, please feel free to comment.

From there though its all the same as the pups soul has to be separated from it’s parents by hooking up cables from them to it’s babies newly built body. The soul has to be removed from its parents own and it’s understandable painful given that the pup was being supported by its parents the whole time up until now. When done however, a new baby stitchpunk enters into the world and a parent is now with child. I really like this theory but there is still another part to all this that I will go into now.      

Process #2 – Body into World

Like before, two stitchpunks soulbond and one becomes pregnant. Like the other process the babies soul is housed in its parents for a certain amount of time before it most be removed when mature. UNLIKE the other process though, this one has a new twist. Instead of the soul mature inside its parent and than being given a body during the delivery; this process instead says that the babies body is added directly INTO the parents own were it stays.

The idea behind all this I guess is that, the soul with fuse or ‘bond’ into the body well being housed inside its parent so that when its finally time for the pup to be born, all one has to do is simply reach in, separate a single cord attaching the babe to the parent and viola! You have a kicking, crying baby just like we as humans would. It also makes a bit more sense in the whole ‘looking’ pregnant thing because there actually is a solid life form housed into the parent before birth meaning you can see it, feel it and know its right there with all this odd science (to a degree) behind it. The only thing I really don’t about this one is that I kinda worry carrying about a body inside the pregnant stitchpunk may be more dangerous for both them and the baby in the harsh world they live in.

If you feel differently than by all means, comment and tell me otherwise. I’m actually very curious to this one given that so few people seem to actually use it. But besides that, I have one more theory on stitchpunk reproduction to go through here. Hold on tight now; we’re almost done.

Theory #2 – Soul mixing

Alright, this one is a little different and for those that don’t use the ‘soulbonding’ theory this seems to be the only other method most fans will use as a means for their characters to get pregnant. The idea appears to be that two stitchpunks (mostly just one male and one female) will combine or ‘mix’ their souls together using some type of device (I’m guessing the talisman or something like it) when wanting to become parents but from here it all changes again.

Process #1 – Soul Cocktail

Some fans say the mixture of the two souls goes BACK into the female from here and like the popular theory of soul bonding, must mature inside her for awhile before it can be giving its own body. Like the soulbonding theory, it seems the stitchpunk will have pregnant like symptoms and even get bigger despite it only being a soul but, they never have an intimate reason for becoming pregnant like the other method.

Kinda seem like a bit more work to me but, I would like some more detail to this one as it again suffers from issues that I don’t quite see as needed but still would not rule out as a possible method for now. Please give me your opinion on this one if you have any.

Process #2 – Talisman fusion

The only other process seems to be less favored and is merely two stitchpunks taking a part of their souls, using a device like the talisman and fusing their souls directly into the body of their crafted child. Meaning the kid pops right awake into the world as a perfect combination of its parents without all the other needed hassle. It’s not a seen or used but, its still worth mentioning as some fans both use it and actually prefer it to the other ones listed beforehand.  

Alright. That’s all I have to write about these questions, methods and views to fans wanting baby stitchpunks in the world. I personally have no hatred, dislike or fuss for any of these ways made up by you fans but, I still would like some more input to just how it all works. Or even WHY you like baby stitchpunks so much; I know their cute and all but…are they really possible in this world? Tell me if you can. And I’ll see if I may become one of you yet.
Related content
Comments: 23

9fanforever9909 [2016-05-25 00:41:44 +0000 UTC]

I like Soulbonding the best.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

13thefreerunner [2016-04-16 16:09:51 +0000 UTC]

There is also 's non talismatic pregnancy 

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

herio In reply to 13thefreerunner [2016-04-17 03:41:40 +0000 UTC]

Process #2   

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ZADRpunk In reply to 13thefreerunner [2016-04-16 18:43:41 +0000 UTC]

??? What's that mean?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AskThe-OCs [2016-03-28 07:51:35 +0000 UTC]

omg I thought this fandom died ;u; I am glad it's not

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZADRpunk In reply to AskThe-OCs [2016-03-28 08:28:05 +0000 UTC]

It's gone a little quiet over the years but, I still enjoy it greatly. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AskThe-OCs In reply to ZADRpunk [2016-03-28 12:10:41 +0000 UTC]

I think it's like a once a year thing like they come back on 9-9

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZADRpunk In reply to AskThe-OCs [2016-03-28 19:59:11 +0000 UTC]

Not in my heart

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AskThe-OCs In reply to ZADRpunk [2016-03-30 01:18:51 +0000 UTC]

*hugs*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZADRpunk In reply to AskThe-OCs [2016-03-30 03:13:12 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AskThe-OCs In reply to ZADRpunk [2016-03-30 23:51:53 +0000 UTC]

Hehe :3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LonelySoulPunk [2016-03-05 18:49:44 +0000 UTC]

As one of the only people apparently using body into world theory, XD, I shall reassure you!... Or, well, I'll assure you of my theory because I don't know anyone else who uses it.

In the current theory I am using, damage to the baby's body while in the parent will at worst cause the baby's soul to reject the body. Thus the baby's soul will still be alive, but the body will have to be fixed properly and put back in to finish fusing. The normal pregnancy lasts about two months, but when a body is damaged it may cause pregnancy to last longer.

Babies naturally learn to go quiet around a threat in an instinctual way, which helps with Beast attacks. Though it usually isn't common practice to take a baby outside unless it is safe and it is guarded. A fortunate thing is that Beasts usually go for the adults, overlooking the young ones because their size lessens how much they are noticed and lowers their appearance as a visual threat.

Baby Stitchpunks are also adorable. XD

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

ZADRpunk In reply to LonelySoulPunk [2016-03-06 02:56:03 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the information. So in a way, your theory is more or less to protect the soul of the young at all costs huh? Interesting. Does that mean that until being put into a body the babies soul is possible at danger at any time?

I have to confess that the only reason I am so curious is because of liking stitchpup babies myself but can't seem to find a fan theory that I like enough to use fully. Yours is interesting in the idea of the body being inside the parent which would allow the parents to feel their baby moving and such but also the way pups go quite from danger is just plain smart. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ZeeWerecat [2016-02-27 03:28:20 +0000 UTC]

For the same sex soul-bonding thing: my thoughts on that is the submissive one is would be the one to conceive. Male or female, it doesn't matter. If both parties are the same gender the one on bottom gets pregnant.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZADRpunk In reply to ZeeWerecat [2016-02-27 03:49:05 +0000 UTC]

And, what if there is no directly submissive partner? Some couples, same or opposite take turns as the dominant one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZeeWerecat In reply to ZADRpunk [2016-02-27 04:03:58 +0000 UTC]

Well then whoever's in the submissive position at that moment would be the carrier.

I never really thought about that before.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZADRpunk In reply to ZeeWerecat [2016-02-27 04:14:40 +0000 UTC]

Eh. It was just a thought. Like the paper says, I've seen same-sex pairings before having kids; most people just won't defend why they can't. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MetaLatias5 In reply to ZADRpunk [2016-02-27 22:11:25 +0000 UTC]

the way werecatkid17 described it is actually how I always used it before
for example, I have an OC who's pretty much always dominant, but on one specific occasion in a roleplay he was forced into it by another OC and held back throughout because he didn't want it and because of this he was the submissive one in that specific situation and ended up pregnant for the first and only time (that other OC was female btw, since I never differ between male or female souls either, to me stitchpunks are only gendered by their voice)

I always imagined it that way that the more dominant soul is thrusting into the less dominant one in a way and so in the end leaves a bit of itself inside the others soul, this tiny bit of a soul mixes with the soul of the receiver and so forms the beginning of the childs soul which from then on grows inside that stitchpunks body, connected to the mother soul until it's big and stable enough to be moved into its own body

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZADRpunk In reply to MetaLatias5 [2016-02-27 23:53:41 +0000 UTC]

Wow. That's actually very helpful to me; thank you. Sorry to whatever character of your was forced into something like that but, its nice to hear I'm not the only one that doesn't really see a difference between stitchpunk genders other than voices. Again, thanks for your input here.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MetaLatias5 In reply to ZADRpunk [2016-02-28 00:45:57 +0000 UTC]

no problem and it's ok, it may not have been consensual between those OCs but it was between my RP-partner and me we both like to create drama and angst XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZADRpunk In reply to MetaLatias5 [2016-02-28 01:50:28 +0000 UTC]

Sadly, so do I alot of the time. I'm kinda a sadistic writer when getting into conflicts and usually 'play' with my favorite characters the hardest. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MetaLatias5 In reply to ZADRpunk [2016-02-28 04:53:06 +0000 UTC]

don't be sorry about it, it's ok to be sadistic with fictional characters, a lot of people find that fun

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ZADRpunk In reply to MetaLatias5 [2016-02-28 04:55:15 +0000 UTC]

^///^ Thanks. I seriously only do it like I said with my favorite characters. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0