Comments: 31
Limelight-Night [2012-08-16 04:16:14 +0000 UTC]
Overall
Vision
Originality
Technique
Impact
Ok my turn!
VISION: Ok first of all I'm not exactly sure what 'vision' refers to. Simply what I'm looking at or the idea/vision you had in mind? I'll go with both to be safe.
Okay, I am a fan of bright colors so when I saw this I was pretty delighted. When I close one eye and blur the other the background looks even cooler. 8) Super trippy. The simple doodle style you used for the background I like as well, I think it's suiting for the paperback idea. It gives it a feel, or mood that can't quite explain. Since the background is more abstract it better represents intangible thoughts of the mind that can only be represented through picture or writing.
I agree with the other person that the girl looks too flat. I think she needs more dimension overall since she's the focus. Like they said, the back leg is too small and her body looks rather stiff. Since this is cartoon styled, I think she could benefit from a cartoon rule that says whatever is strait the other side should be curved. here's a link to what i mean: [link] the same goes for her arms, midsection, fingers etc.
ORIGINALITY: I like the idea for this a lot! It was one sentence but it leaves room for much to learn about this character. e.deviantart.net/emoticons/s/s… " width="15" height="15" alt="" title=" (Smile)"/> I disagree with the other critique when they mentioned not knowing what it was about. It's okay that we don't know what's behind this until we read about it. That's exactly what an illustration is. If you look in any illustrated book you wouldn't know what all was going on until you read it.
TECHNIQUE: Like said, I think the background lines are good, the composition/balance is good too. It's not an elaborate technique you used but it's sufficient. Having the same applied to the girl is not as impressive however.
IMPACT: Overall, everything comes together quite well in this piece, and it is definitely impacting with all bright colors. I think is is an odd rating as well, because not all good 5 star pieces are impacting you know? Like, it's too much of a verb, to literal sounding. Like BAM. IMPACT. So yeah this definitely has that. But I think what it supposed to mean is how well the whole piece hits you, or something like that. Like, right off the back youre like WOW AWESOME PICTURE VERY WELL DONE A+++ But yeah. Your grade letter isssss B-
NOT BAD
8D e.deviantart.net/emoticons/h/h… " width="15" height="13" alt="" title="Heart"/>
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Shiny-Hunter [2012-08-14 00:15:00 +0000 UTC]
Overall
Vision
Originality
Technique
Impact
One critique coming up!
I sorta go from the focus to the background.
To start with, it was very nice to be able to easily pick out the black-haired girl as the main focus, with all the other stuff going on, which is really nice. It adds sort of a central feeling.
The main problem I have, though, is I feel like her face is really flat. I get the feeling it's because of the way her nose is tilted to the left, slightly. Rather than the bridge of the nose going straight, it looks more like this: /, if you line it up. If you angle it to the right, however, it'd give more dimension to her face, because it's following the direction she is facing, as well as the direction she is moving in.
While part of it looks like it's perspective, her legs are a tad bit long than they should be, since arms and legs are pretty close in length, though I'm not entirely sure.
The perspective looks really nice on her right leg, but I feel like her left leg is a lot longer, based on this perspective, because it got smaller pretty fast, if that makes sense.
Her arms and torso look to be the right length to me. C:
The shading on her body is a bit weird, because her torso and legs are shaded perfectly, but her head and arms are not, as well as her shoes,headphones, and belt.
Since this is a simpler picture(by that I mean texture and that it's lineless), the lack of texture actually adds to it, but it makes her pants actually stand out a bit more having a texture to them.
I feel that the pose of her overall is nice, but the upper part is a bit stiff. I can easily imagine her legs walking like they are, but her hands and arms in their current position look a bit awkward. Maybe make the arms less tense/straight, because you can sort of see a curve to the motion of her walking, and yet her arms are perfectly straight.
As for the background, it hits you, with all the bright colors that clash and blend together, showing the imagination of the paperback novels mentioned in your description.
The mind's a bit more jumbled, thoughts are bouncing around. It would've looks even more like that if you had mixed them up-thrown around the different images in a disorderly fashion, while blacking out part of it for Margaret. I think that would have conveyed the jumbled mess of thoughts that authors tend to have while writing, as well as show the books that had been thrown away, if that makes sense.
That's all I can think of, so I'll just go over the colorful little star-score things:
Vision: I gave it 2.5 stars here because, while the novels are being compared to her, they instead seem to revolve around her in the picture, because of how orderly they appear. And, had I not read the description, I would not have known what this was about.
Originality: 4 stars, because I really enjoy looking at this. This is something a bit different than what I usually see, and to be frank, I've never heard of a comparison like that.
Technique: 3 stars, because of every detail you find as you look at this more and more. The problem is is that there are minor problems here and there that I keep finding while looking at this.
Impact:3 stars, because, while the bright colors grabbed my attention, it wore out a bit after a while.
Overall, there are tiny things here and there that need to be fixed, but it still it very nice to look at.
If you have questions, or you think this or that is a bit skewed/whatever, feel free to say so! C:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Shiny-Hunter In reply to Zakeno [2012-08-14 00:40:37 +0000 UTC]
Ah, okay. That's cool, and does sound fun! C: I might mess around with it sometime.
Well, glad I could help!
Oh, okay, now that makes more sense then what I thought! And you're very welcome! Sorry if it wasn't too helpful.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zakeno In reply to Shiny-Hunter [2012-08-14 00:49:04 +0000 UTC]
Nah, it definitely was, I really do appreciate critique. Sooooo much. *o* <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Shiny-Hunter In reply to Zakeno [2012-08-14 00:50:54 +0000 UTC]
So do I, man.
I feel like people are too scared to give critiques these days, you know? It bothers me.
But then again, to many people start getting mad at the slightest critique. :/
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zakeno In reply to Shiny-Hunter [2012-08-14 01:01:10 +0000 UTC]
No, it's totally true... which is too bad, because it's going to be something you have to face if you want to get in the industry. Critique is probably the most helpful thing for a budding artist. *o*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Shiny-Hunter In reply to Zakeno [2012-08-14 01:03:49 +0000 UTC]
I know! I don't intend to get in the industry(You're my age, but you're a lot more advanced. 👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Shiny-Hunter In reply to Zakeno [2012-08-14 17:13:43 +0000 UTC]
It is. :/
People learn at different paces and get upset when someone younger/same age is better at art.
I don't get upset-it just gives me reason to improve! Because if you can get this good at your age, then I can get better soon! C:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zakeno In reply to Shiny-Hunter [2012-08-14 22:17:39 +0000 UTC]
Then you're much more mature than most artists (our?) age: and kudos to you for it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Shiny-Hunter In reply to Zakeno [2012-08-14 22:20:21 +0000 UTC]
Oh, thanks! C:>
I need to learn a lot still, but I'm trying. :U
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Zakeno In reply to KeatonsGhost [2013-01-16 06:51:49 +0000 UTC]
Aw, thanks so much man!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PaDubs [2012-09-26 21:31:14 +0000 UTC]
Very nice !
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zakeno In reply to PaDubs [2012-10-01 19:22:00 +0000 UTC]
Thank you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Zakeno In reply to walkingParanoia [2012-08-14 15:36:03 +0000 UTC]
Oh, are they still actually doing things or still no updates? |D; Thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
walkingParanoia In reply to Zakeno [2012-08-14 18:09:06 +0000 UTC]
Hm, I don't actually know. They did their new vid awhile ago, tho~
And you're welcome!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Fizzybopper [2012-08-14 00:30:42 +0000 UTC]
Kiki. Can I marry your art plz?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zakeno In reply to Fizzybopper [2012-08-14 00:35:24 +0000 UTC]
Sure, but I must warn you that my art is a bit of a tease at best...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Shiny-Hunter [2012-08-13 23:40:09 +0000 UTC]
I was thinking of critiquing, since you asked. C:>
Is there anything in particular you want imput on? Because some people want to be critique on certain thing. :1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zakeno In reply to Shiny-Hunter [2012-08-13 23:48:54 +0000 UTC]
I am the least easily peeved of anyone you'll probably know... x) <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Shiny-Hunter In reply to Zakeno [2012-08-14 00:03:55 +0000 UTC]
Awesome. C:
I'm working on it right now, and I'm almost done!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0