Comments: 20
salvaggio [2006-10-01 22:26:37 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful! more interesting
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SpanishJohnny [2006-09-07 08:15:16 +0000 UTC]
wow, very nice work
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KylieKeene [2006-09-07 06:09:55 +0000 UTC]
I like simple shots like this, the minimal effect makes it more personal and interesting.
The shallow depth of field works very well in this, the young hands on a what looks like aged and rough surface gives it such a worn feeling. Almost a sweat shop/ detention center look. I don't know how to explain it any better I'm sorry lol
I like the positioning of the light over the arms and back of the hands, keeps it mysterious.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
vurbul [2006-09-07 03:04:32 +0000 UTC]
This one is really cool!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
esion [2006-09-07 02:29:47 +0000 UTC]
she has lizzys hands without the long fingernails.
this is nice, one of your better.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zenhead In reply to esion [2006-09-07 10:48:45 +0000 UTC]
thats your vase that she's holding...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
esion In reply to Zenhead [2006-09-07 13:07:25 +0000 UTC]
Im going to hope that was a joke becuase..
...I see no vase.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zenhead In reply to esion [2006-09-08 09:22:14 +0000 UTC]
no really, thats your vase. and lizzy's hands. no joke.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
esion In reply to Zenhead [2006-09-08 09:44:32 +0000 UTC]
I knew they were lizzys hands. read the comment. I didnt want to say that because you didnt mention a name in the desc. I assumed you would have credited lizzy so I thought Perhaps just PERHAPS it was someone else with lizzy lookalike hands.
and i see no vase.
and trivial as this whole thing is. dont even begin to tell me i dont know my own girlfriends hands when i see them.
I simply take the curtousy of assuming that I COULD POSSIBLY be wrong sometimes.
take that as advice.
and please.. for everyones sake, stop talking to your friends like theyre crap.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zenhead In reply to esion [2006-09-08 10:08:13 +0000 UTC]
you took me too seriously.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
foig [2006-09-07 00:02:46 +0000 UTC]
Did you order your DD-X ?
Ben trying to get my hands on some for ages.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Zenhead In reply to foig [2006-09-17 01:29:23 +0000 UTC]
my local store stocks dd-x, but not x-tol. very similar, dd-x i think would produce nicer results with the ilford films but i dunno.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
foig In reply to Zenhead [2006-09-18 20:23:35 +0000 UTC]
DD-X is just a great developer for pushed films, handles the highlights and contrast really well. My lousy camera store told me that Ilfotec LC29 was DD-X which i didnt really believe but still bought. Turns out it's actually just a liquid form of HC-11
Grrr. I want dd-x dammit.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ahmedwkhan [2006-09-06 23:39:36 +0000 UTC]
lovely focus !
👍: 0 ⏩: 0