Comments: 13
Zlooolz [2009-09-14 19:52:33 +0000 UTC]
Nice body!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Mariochaz [2009-04-22 13:34:20 +0000 UTC]
stunning
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
osiruscirce [2009-04-22 01:30:04 +0000 UTC]
wow beautiful tones. Great model. Great shot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MatthewPaver [2009-04-20 13:55:20 +0000 UTC]
great shot. the image looks like its got a slight soft focus which works well in my eyes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sirwanqutbi [2009-04-20 13:13:24 +0000 UTC]
is it me... or does she have no tits.?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
sirwanqutbi In reply to wayneoween [2009-04-20 13:54:07 +0000 UTC]
yeah but dude, that is just on another scale of titlessness. i think i have more tits.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MatthewPaver In reply to sirwanqutbi [2009-04-20 13:58:06 +0000 UTC]
She's probably better looking than any woman within 50 miles of me so why would i care about the "titlessness" as you put it. stop been so shallow m8, you might achieve more.
Oh, and don't be predictable and say I must live in alaska or a trailer park or somewhere else where there are no women etc...
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
sirwanqutbi In reply to MatthewPaver [2009-04-20 14:20:29 +0000 UTC]
abit oximorinic to say im shallow and then say shes probably the pretties woman within a 50 mile radius.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MatthewPaver In reply to sirwanqutbi [2009-04-20 16:39:26 +0000 UTC]
not when i appreciate everyone for their own qualities. i think the hint was that you shouldn't bash peoples artwork unless it's actually constructive. how is "tittyless" constructive or in anyway anything to do with the aims and ethics of this site?
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
sirwanqutbi In reply to MatthewPaver [2009-04-20 17:39:21 +0000 UTC]
still was an oxymoronic statement, but tittylessness was such a bold element within the photo of what seemed to be a glamour shot.. therefore would in absolutey everyway stand out to many audiences viewing this photo, i myself pointed out the irony here.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0