HOME | DD
zort β a room for one's own
Published: 2006-05-04 21:05:45 +0000 UTC; Views: 1209; Favourites: 18; Downloads: 350
Redirect to original
Description
yet another bench shot.i need leica glass.
tmax100, 35/1,4, f2, 1/60
Related content
Comments: 83
yeah.. a bit soft ... but what a heck
π: 0 β©: 1
good thing that i switched already...
the 35 cron is so sweeet...
π: 0 β©: 1
are you going to Photokina next month?
π: 0 β©: 1
no, never been there and i honestly dont see a reason for going there.
are you going?
π: 0 β©: 2
nope... I have other things to do with my sort life
π: 0 β©: 0
nope... I have other things to do with my sort life
π: 0 β©: 1
yeah, leica m6 with a 35/2. nice combo.
you are shooting a rolleiflex - right?
π: 0 β©: 1
yeah and a hassy ... speaking of Rollei... thanks god the manual stuff... I have dipped it in the ocean an other day... but it's working like a champ
π: 0 β©: 1
is the one with the planar? because id love to have a rolleiflex... but then again, id rather get some glass for the leica before getting one. great to see people shooting that camera.
π: 0 β©: 1
no, it's a Tessar 3.5 it's about 52 years old... and I love it..
π: 0 β©: 1
what glass do you have got for your leica so far? heh, 35/1,4 - nice, tho i think that the 35 cron is really really amazing for that size.
π: 0 β©: 1
35/1.4-50/1.4-75/1.4-90/2 but I'm thinking I'll selling the 90 don't use it lately....
π: 0 β©: 1
are they asph or pre-asph? hows the 75? do you shoot them professionally or for your private shots?
π: 0 β©: 1
they're all aspherical except the 75/1.4 ... however, as far as I know they do make 75/2 aspherical... in my opinion.. two leses good to have 35 and the 75 and that's it... or if you do hardcore photojournalism than maybe the 28/2 ...
π: 0 β©: 1
do you see a lot of difference between the asph and non-asph? ive read the article about the 75/2 in the leica magazine and yeah... lets state it like that: id love to shoot that lense. id love to.
π: 0 β©: 1
visually in the long lenses you don't see the difference... on the 35 you do especially if you do projection of your slides... by the way, have you shot kodachrome film with the leica yet? it's screams and begging you at same time to shot more of it
π: 0 β©: 1
havent shot any slides so far, mainly because i lack of a projector and have a hard time scanning slides. i just prefer bw and sometimes c41... well, maybe eventually i get a 35/1,4 asph then.
π: 0 β©: 1
what kind a scanner do you use? usually scanners do like positive imegas.. I have one of the Nikon's Coolscan and it's screams for positive film
π: 0 β©: 1
im also using a nikon coolscan - the nikon coolscan v ed to be precise. great scanner but i think the slides are always a bit off. especially with fuji, the kodaks are better. what soup are you using for your bw stuff? anyways, enjoy developing.
π: 0 β©: 1
I use d-76... since I can reuse it for a 6 months of a period... I also use ilford ilfotec dd-x and ilford microphen but these are oneshot developers... thanks
π: 0 β©: 1
you reuse d76? do you add like 10% of the time or do you mean you can store it for 6 months? dd-x can be used several times as far as i remember... but then again, i stick to xtol.
interesting - i never had pleasing results with apx400. developed it with xtol, d76 and rodinal, always with the recommened settings but i got horrible grain and messy contrast. no good. perhaps, its different with 120 film... just tried 135.
π: 0 β©: 1
I always reuse d76 proxi after 3 months I add 25% more development time... ususally I use it for 6 months then changed for a new stock.... I don't use replenisher... don't like those so much.. although, sometimes add some photo grade sodium sulfite to achieve finer grain and boost some shadow detail...
π: 0 β©: 2
btw, sorry for bugging you. but thanks for answering all those questions.
π: 0 β©: 1
haha, nice, so you actually get 3,6 l stock and use that for 6 months... do you experience any loss in quality? never. what do you think about kodak xtol?
π: 0 β©: 1
you should, i think it's a wonderful developer.
π: 0 β©: 0
really nice. i like the focusing, lots of depth!
π: 0 β©: 0
Nice shot, some very interesting bokeh there. Really like the depth you got with this.
I miss tmax100. I miss film.
π: 0 β©: 1
why don't you grab some nikon body and the 50 mm and enjoy tmax100?
π: 0 β©: 1
that's on my list of plans. waiting on my paycheck though.
π: 0 β©: 0
I am favoriting this shot because of your horribly harsh bokeh.
π: 0 β©: 1
Beautiful photo, great dof
π: 0 β©: 0
it's as if she closed her eyes & the unreal, fake world around her went blurry...
relaxing, meditative, occasionally deep.
π: 0 β©: 0
Wow. 
π: 0 β©: 0
Actually i like the bokeh in this pic a lot, it really adds to the pic! Love the emotions in the shot too....great cap, once again!
π: 0 β©: 0
A lovely shot.
Terrific depth of field.
Great model.
π: 0 β©: 1
Not a problem.
Thank you for sharing!!
π: 0 β©: 0
Holy FUCK theres a lot of bokeh in this shot.
I really like this.
And we all want a 35 lux haha, especially for slow films with lots of detail.
π: 0 β©: 0
Morgen is ja im Leica Shop 'n Flohmarkt. Schau dich doch da mal um ...
HΓΌbsches Bild , aber mit irgendwie strangem hintergrund
π: 0 β©: 2
was ist mit dem hintergrund? auΓer dass das bokeh eher kackΓ© ist.
π: 0 β©: 1
Naja scheint irgendwie so als wΓΌrd alles mittig zusammenlaufen. Ist etwas verwirrend ..
π: 0 β©: 1
ich hab noch immer keine ahnung, was du meinst.
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>