Synthetamine In reply to ??? [2010-10-08 23:06:59 +0000 UTC]

no clothes, they were camouflaged with the vines though

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Synthetamine In reply to monochromatic-stains [2010-09-16 20:10:11 +0000 UTC]

lol well I think the ambiguous gender helped the page's popularity

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

monochromatic-stains In reply to Synthetamine [2010-09-17 00:38:22 +0000 UTC]

My ambiguous gender isn't helping my page's popularity.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Synthetamine In reply to monochromatic-stains [2010-09-17 00:53:54 +0000 UTC]

I haven't gotten barely any new watchers since dA's message center overhaul, so it has been several months

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

monochromatic-stains In reply to Synthetamine [2010-09-17 06:11:11 +0000 UTC]

Same here. My message count is actually dropping.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Synthetamine In reply to ??? [2010-09-05 16:56:00 +0000 UTC]

186,000 got

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Babyshag In reply to ??? [2010-08-20 15:35:00 +0000 UTC]

ty for visiting my page

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

darksunny In reply to ??? [2010-08-15 14:28:10 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for watch

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Fear-the-thought In reply to ??? [2010-08-15 02:22:44 +0000 UTC]

Nice gallery, I just have some misunderstanding as to the meaning.

Syn- Greek prefix meaning with or together.

Thetamine, Common misspelling of the psycho-stimulant drug Phetamine or Amphetamine.

So with Amphetamine?

Does work have to do with Ritalin and drug use then?

Of course never-mind me, I think too much.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Synthetamine In reply to Fear-the-thought [2010-08-15 03:50:21 +0000 UTC]

you are on the right track, more perceptive than most

break it down like this

Synth- synthetic, synthesis, created

thetamine- referring to a class of stimulant drugs

so consider it a drug I have created - an unnatural chemical compound - that keeps people coming back for more

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FinalGamers-2012 In reply to ??? [2010-08-14 15:15:56 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the visit!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mark-neko-chan In reply to ??? [2010-08-14 14:00:07 +0000 UTC]

thx for the visite ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

laurachanXD In reply to ??? [2010-08-14 08:39:36 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the visit!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dupa-the-Surt In reply to ??? [2010-08-14 04:22:44 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the visit

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Synthetamine In reply to ??? [2010-08-14 02:36:30 +0000 UTC]

Moderated

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SolarByte In reply to ??? [2010-08-14 00:48:26 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Owner

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Synthetamine In reply to SolarByte [2010-08-14 02:49:05 +0000 UTC]

hey! thats a good observation - users wouldn't be able to opt out of seeing the mature content that way, I'll look into it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SolarByte In reply to Synthetamine [2010-08-14 11:59:26 +0000 UTC]

Indeed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Octopus-Parade In reply to SolarByte [2010-08-14 01:07:20 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Owner

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SolarByte In reply to Octopus-Parade [2010-08-14 01:10:41 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Owner

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trees-grow-on-trees In reply to SolarByte [2010-08-14 01:19:02 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Owner

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SolarByte In reply to trees-grow-on-trees [2010-08-14 01:25:20 +0000 UTC]

She's visting the same people over and over again, so eventually you visit her page.
C: it's annoying.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Synthetamine In reply to SolarByte [2010-08-14 02:39:10 +0000 UTC]

interesting, I'll take that into consideration, more effective than adcast I imagine xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SolarByte In reply to Synthetamine [2010-08-14 11:59:44 +0000 UTC]

Aha, You do that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Synthetamine In reply to SolarByte [2010-08-14 14:13:52 +0000 UTC]

no, it sounds interesting and effective

man, half of dA would get laughed out of a court of law

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SolarByte In reply to Synthetamine [2010-08-14 16:37:28 +0000 UTC]

oh u

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Mariska1974 In reply to ??? [2010-08-14 00:45:26 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for your visit.

Good weekend!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

sharon43210 In reply to ??? [2010-08-14 00:08:36 +0000 UTC]

Temp. web-mistress for Sharon, Charlene---

Thank you for your visit.
My sister and I would agree, you do an amazing gallery
I am a photographer myself, your craft-work superb.

...The Williams Sisters on DA

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Synthetamine In reply to sharon43210 [2010-08-14 02:37:48 +0000 UTC]

thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nuuhku87 In reply to ??? [2010-08-13 22:38:40 +0000 UTC]

Hi!
Thanks for you visit. I think I have seen you visiting me before(?) If I haven't said this before, I must say that you webcam pic is beautifull!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Renegadellf In reply to ??? [2010-07-19 22:36:52 +0000 UTC]

GOD DAMN IT, you beat me to the fractal/model video idea D:



Sad face. What tools do you use? I've been trying to teach myself Adobe Premiere and it's destroying my mind and soul

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Synthetamine In reply to Renegadellf [2010-07-19 23:13:16 +0000 UTC]

lol, the only thing holding me back for the last year was not being able to shoot HD footage

Apophysis, FLAM4, Apophymator, Adobe After Effects, Adobe Premiere

other programs for the music scores

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Renegadellf In reply to Synthetamine [2010-07-20 03:36:15 +0000 UTC]

I JUST bought my HD camera, set me back 800 bucks, but it has an obscenely high DPI and quality. Could never get Flam4 to work with the 3D hack of Apo, and it seems like you've figured that out, judging by some of those Julian sets you're playing with in your webcam. Going to have to look into Apophymator, don't even know what that is.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Synthetamine In reply to Renegadellf [2010-07-20 21:57:11 +0000 UTC]

Flam4 can't use 3D. Apophymator can animate a 3D rotation. Apophymator is completely CPU bound and therefore much slower.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Renegadellf In reply to Synthetamine [2010-08-07 13:42:53 +0000 UTC]

thanks for the tip. Playing around with apophymator now, it's definitely going to take some learning to get that script to do what i want. lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Synthetamine In reply to Renegadellf [2010-08-07 14:54:39 +0000 UTC]

Apophymator isn't very intuitive but it is very easy

1 - Save a couple keyframes in your .flame file
2 - some of the render settings in apophymator have different names than the normal apophysis renderer, but for the most part use the default settings the apophymator script gives you, I always turn PNG transparency on, make sure it is going to RENDER instead if "preview" and also if you plan to actually use them in a video (or as effects in a video) then you need to think about how many frames per second you are going to do and how many frames between keyframes

okay so I guess there will be some trial and error regardless for you, take your time!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ensomniac In reply to ??? [2010-07-07 10:01:36 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Owner

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Synthetamine In reply to Ensomniac [2010-07-07 22:00:21 +0000 UTC]

how do you NOT have a DD, I'll work on that

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ensomniac In reply to Synthetamine [2010-07-07 22:34:04 +0000 UTC]

LOL, that would be nice, thank you very much. BTW, I do plan to do more digital work when I can afford the software, a better computer and when things in the real world quiet down a bit for me. For now, I'm just trying to brush up and get some new things out there.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Synthetamine In reply to HolleyParadox [2010-07-10 21:37:04 +0000 UTC]

yes, thank you, all is well

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HolleyParadox In reply to Synthetamine [2010-07-10 22:20:40 +0000 UTC]

good to hear it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NanasFreak In reply to ??? [2010-07-06 15:12:46 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Owner

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NanasFreak In reply to NanasFreak [2010-07-06 15:15:29 +0000 UTC]

P.S.: I sceencapped this comment for my own records.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Synthetamine In reply to NanasFreak [2010-07-06 22:06:33 +0000 UTC]

lol before I hide it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MysticalMysticism In reply to ??? [2010-07-06 12:51:36 +0000 UTC]

Heyo , wanna be friends? ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1