angstandloathing In reply to idiotsavant [2004-06-26 18:32:13 +0000 UTC]

I wish theatres would show this and "Farenheit" as a double feature. Thanks for the link!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

idiotsavant In reply to angstandloathing [2004-06-26 22:18:52 +0000 UTC]

hah well either one portion of the audience would show for one and leave for the other or not come for one and show up for the other. (im hoping i just said that so it makes some sense). Also and movie theaters trying to do a double feature alone is a challenge for them. .... heck just showing one movie is even hard for them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

unclesherman In reply to ??? [2004-06-25 04:03:57 +0000 UTC]

Hey Ang! Had a hard time trying to leave a reply to you, so I leave it here. Signed the petition, and I also had my shrink sign it...HA!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

angstandloathing In reply to unclesherman [2004-06-25 04:45:49 +0000 UTC]

Doin' our part
Keep passin' it around

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

primus In reply to ??? [2004-06-20 23:14:42 +0000 UTC]

Yo, John.

Isn't about time you got back to `zeruch on that link? You've had that saved for weeks, not days, my somewhat politically aligned friend.

More importantly, what is the link?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

angstandloathing In reply to primus [2004-06-21 11:28:07 +0000 UTC]

Yo Jack,

What link? I don't see anything.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

primus In reply to angstandloathing [2004-06-21 11:35:42 +0000 UTC]

Updates are good

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

idiotsavant In reply to ??? [2004-06-19 22:17:53 +0000 UTC]

whats this 9/11 commission says no connection between sadam and al qaeda

the article

“We have no credible evidence that Iraq and Al Qaeda cooperated on attacks against the United States”

So were in Iraq why now??

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

angstandloathing In reply to idiotsavant [2004-06-20 03:00:44 +0000 UTC]

The 9-11 commission is nothing more than a political slugfest. It's conception was pure common sense, however, it has been predictably hijacked in the name of the liberal agenda. It's findings are invalid, and in this particular instance, intentionally misleading. If you think this is bad, just wait until mid to late October, when I'm sure the full report will be released, complete with bombshell new information. Only after the election will we find out that the commission reported in error.
Remember, some members of the commission have themselves been implicated in the reasons that 9-11 was not prevented.

Not that I expect the facts to get in the way of your rhetoric, though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

angstandloathing In reply to idiotsavant [2004-06-20 02:59:52 +0000 UTC]

The 9-11 commission is nothing more than a political slugfest. It's conception was pure common sense, however, it has been predictably hijacked in the name of the liberal agenda. It's findings are invalid, and in this particular instance, intentionally misleading. If you think this is bad, just wait until mid to late October, when I'm sure the full report will be released, complete with bombshell new information. Only after the election will we find out that the commission reported in error.
Remember, some members of the commission have themselves been implicated in the reasons that 9-11 was not prevented.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

idiotsavant In reply to angstandloathing [2004-06-20 03:49:31 +0000 UTC]

and what happens if that report turns up nothing??

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

angstandloathing In reply to idiotsavant [2004-06-20 11:47:31 +0000 UTC]

Please read what I wrote. The 9-11 commission is a joke. Instead of finding flaws and solutions to them, it is looking for soundbites and embarrassment. It's findings are and will be polluted with liberals lies and accusations. Look for the full report to be released in October, with fresh accusations against the president and his cabinet.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ohnojaylo In reply to angstandloathing [2004-06-21 16:22:14 +0000 UTC]

Actually, I have heard the true reports from the commission, and the wonderful media of america we all love and respect is yet again witholding information...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

angstandloathing In reply to ohnojaylo [2004-06-21 17:04:27 +0000 UTC]

I'd like to see that!

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

ohnojaylo In reply to angstandloathing [2004-06-21 18:33:35 +0000 UTC]

Oops...wrong comment for that reply...*sigh* It's monday, ok? Cut me some slack...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ohnojaylo In reply to angstandloathing [2004-06-21 18:32:40 +0000 UTC]

pffffttthhhhsshh...I dont know if I would...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

primus In reply to ??? [2004-06-17 20:48:33 +0000 UTC]

Did you know Donald used to be in the Secret Service?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

angstandloathing In reply to primus [2004-06-18 01:51:19 +0000 UTC]

I told you he was good!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

roninbearz In reply to ??? [2004-06-17 19:31:11 +0000 UTC]

Hey man!

How's it going today? Think I'm really a Republican, it seems I have more in common with them than I realised! hehe anyway I hope you're well & staying cool.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

primus In reply to ??? [2004-06-16 22:16:30 +0000 UTC]

It is indeed a nice avatar.

It is my tribute to William Hung - true American Idol and hero.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

angstandloathing In reply to primus [2004-06-17 05:29:40 +0000 UTC]

Actually, it sux when compared to your last one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

primus In reply to angstandloathing [2004-06-17 14:19:04 +0000 UTC]

Compared to the angry little red man? I used that on deviantART ages ago, and I felt like giving it an airing... I have a green version too. But none of them compare to my Thatcher avatar.

Maybe you should get a new avatar. You could have an animated version of the Bush Cabinet.

Actually, I quite like that idea. You'd be able to see Spencer Abraham's funny little face and be repulsed by Gale Norton all within the space of five seconds! It's genius, I tell ya.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

angstandloathing In reply to primus [2004-06-17 15:14:10 +0000 UTC]

I would like to see your Thatcher avatar. She's a great lady and I respect her immensely. She's a real credit to Britain.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

primus In reply to angstandloathing [2004-06-17 15:25:39 +0000 UTC]

My Baroness avatar, just for you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

angstandloathing In reply to primus [2004-06-17 16:22:29 +0000 UTC]

This might seem funny, but I never realized her resemblance to William Hung.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

primus In reply to angstandloathing [2004-06-17 16:39:33 +0000 UTC]

You were too slow. I had to change it back.

It isn't very impressive, anyway... it's only this .

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

angstandloathing In reply to primus [2004-06-17 16:47:08 +0000 UTC]

William Hung must be her bastard child, because he looks just exactly like her.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

primus In reply to angstandloathing [2004-06-17 16:49:51 +0000 UTC]

Do you know who William Hague is? I have a theory that William Hague really is her bastard child.

I also have a theory that you, John, are in fact Attorney General John Ashcroft. And you simply come onto deviantART when you're not busy writing PATRIOT II.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

angstandloathing In reply to primus [2004-06-17 16:57:58 +0000 UTC]

Actually, this is part of an investigation. You are currently under surveillance by a beautiful blonde headed woman in a nearby apartment. If you try to sleep with her, you will be kidnapped by a secret network of anti-terror terorists. God will have His vengeance.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

primus In reply to angstandloathing [2004-06-17 16:59:50 +0000 UTC]

God will have His vengeance in the most ironic criminal investigation known to mankind?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

angstandloathing In reply to primus [2004-06-17 17:05:23 +0000 UTC]

He'll have his vengeance on your momma!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

primus In reply to angstandloathing [2004-06-17 18:19:56 +0000 UTC]

Hey, "G-dawg", shouldn't that be "yo' momma"?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

primus In reply to angstandloathing [2004-06-17 15:19:18 +0000 UTC]

If that was intended to annoy me because I'm an "evil liberal", it didn't. She's one of the politicians I respect the most, along with Churchill and Disraeli.

I think her tribute to Reagan was most apt. By the way, I also liked Reagan. And that may very well surprise you, but I did. I would take Reagan over Bush I, Clinton and Bush II.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

angstandloathing In reply to primus [2004-06-17 16:20:18 +0000 UTC]

Me too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

angstandloathing In reply to primus [2004-06-16 16:47:41 +0000 UTC]

Economic Left/Right: 4.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.28

Hey, did you see the scores for Paris Hilton?
Economic Left/Right: -1.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.31

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

primus In reply to angstandloathing [2004-06-16 19:39:07 +0000 UTC]

You're a funny man, John...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

angstandloathing In reply to primus [2004-06-16 20:14:47 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

angstandloathing In reply to primus [2004-06-16 16:24:26 +0000 UTC]

Your Personal Self-Government Score is 70%.
Your Economic Self-Government Score is 90%.
Says I'm a Libertarian, which I do rather agree with.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mooboy In reply to ??? [2004-06-13 04:11:28 +0000 UTC]

Nah, I don't hate ya man. I will be posting some stuff when I get back from San Diego.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

primus In reply to ??? [2004-06-13 01:52:00 +0000 UTC]

In order to cover up my previous, badly HTMLed post, and to continue with my campaign of being such a nice liberal that you can't hate me...

The following Bible stories were apparently written by children and are genuine, authentic and unretouched. Richard Lederer assembled them; they appeared in National Review magazine on 1995-DEC-31.

In the first book of the Bible, Guinness's, God got tired of creating the world, so He took the Sabbath off. Adam and Eve were created from an apple tree. Noah's wife was called Joan of Ark. Noah built an ark, which the animals came on to in pears. Lot's wife was a pillar of salt by day, but a ball of fire by night.
The Jews were a proud people and throughout history they had trouble with the unsympathetic Genitals. Samson was a strongman who let himself be led astray by a Jezebel like Delilah. Samson slayed the Philistines with the axe of the apostles.
Moses led the Hebrews to the Red Sea, where they made unleavened bread, which is bread made without any ingredients. The Egyptians were all drowned in the dessert. Afterwards, Moses went up on Mount Cyanide to get the Ten Amendments. The First Commandment was when Eve told Adam to eat the apple. The Fifth Commandment is to humor thy father and mother. The seventh Commandment is thou shalt not admit adultery.
Moses died before he ever reached Canada. Then Joshua led the Hebrews in the battle of Geritol. The greatest miracle in the Bible is when Joshua told his son to stand still and he obeyed him.
David was a Hebrew king skilled at playing the liar. He fought with the Finklesteins, a race of people who lived in Biblical times. Solomon, one of David's sons, had 300 wives and 700 porcupines.
Jesus enunciated the Golden Rule, which says to do one to others before they do one to you. He also explained, "Man doth not live by sweat alone."
The people who followed the Lord were called the 12 decibels. The epistles were the wives of the apostles. One of the opossums was St. Matthew who was, by profession, a taximan.
St. Paul cavorted to Christianity. He preached holy acrimony, which is another name for marriage. A Christian should have only one wife. This is called monotony.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

angstandloathing In reply to primus [2004-06-13 04:46:31 +0000 UTC]

Thats too damn rich
Really enjoyed that - thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

roninbearz In reply to ??? [2004-06-10 16:50:30 +0000 UTC]

Good afternoon!~

How are things going today? you seem to have a pretty good eye for composition, please post some more pix when you have the time

Take care & have a super weekend!
-bearz

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

angstandloathing In reply to roninbearz [2004-06-10 20:09:54 +0000 UTC]

Afternoon to you!

And thank you! I consider that a great compliment coming from someone with your talent.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

roninbearz In reply to angstandloathing [2004-06-10 22:00:41 +0000 UTC]

I hope you get that camera out & take some pix soon, what's yr fave subject-stuff to photograph?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

angstandloathing In reply to roninbearz [2004-06-10 22:49:38 +0000 UTC]

I like architecture, landscapes, and more recently children. One of my favorites is a shot I took a long time ago of St. John's Island as seen from St. Thomas. Then I have some great shots of a little town on Sicily named Motta. But if the prints and negatives survived the divorce, I haven't seen them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

primus In reply to angstandloathing [2004-06-11 04:06:07 +0000 UTC]

You know, if I was a truly evil bastard, I would quote you out of context so fast... but I'm not.

As much as I like to give you shit about the ACLU and , you do seem to be an honest enough chap (bar the dubious sources and occasional hegemonist comment), and a likable one at that.

I'm also slightly disappointed that you pulled down the other deviations that you had up, I never got a chance to look at them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Chapster In reply to ??? [2004-06-09 13:26:12 +0000 UTC]

Heya !!! After seeing your post in my hawk thread I just had to stop by and say Hi ! ...... I can think of 2 people that need to go on your shitlist.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1