ZiizV [2024-09-02 05:01:07 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Foxhatart [2024-03-04 21:27:30 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

GlassDrag0n [2022-11-13 05:15:33 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Nomads-of-Korsun [2022-08-05 22:05:48 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

SueaNoi [2018-03-18 14:07:30 +0000 UTC]

Hi! thanks for watching and faving and even more importantly, commenting!
Do I know you outside of DA? or you just saw me and thought to follow. anyway, nice to meet you! What was the thing of mine that caught your eye?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Bizarroghoon [2017-10-10 03:50:19 +0000 UTC]

Hey I received a few of your comments on some of my older artwork.  Thank you for the attention and favorites even if my SFW Deviant art is lacking.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BearChiId [2017-09-17 16:09:46 +0000 UTC]

;-; Thank you so much for the watch 
Here have a cookie~

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rubycored [2017-01-14 10:42:26 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FeatherSpiral [2015-05-17 10:42:36 +0000 UTC]

comments.deviantart.com/1/4801…

-

> Just because a man regrets having sex with a woman does not mean it's rape.
I'd like to remind you that "taking advantage" is the act itself, "regret" is after that. Not the only instance of you misusing a word to accommodate yourself, but still as sad.

> Do I think that what she did was acceptable? Of course not.
Good to see we're on the same wavelength on this one particular aspect.

> However, I do not accept it as rape
I never said it had to be, either. At least not just because of his age and how he felt.
I just find it suspicious that she never told him.

> and I believe that 14-year-olds should take responsibility for their actions.
But grown adult women shouldn't. Okay.
Also, you can't take responsibility for a consequence before you know it occurred.

-

> I asked you to stop replying, and you continue to harass me with anti-woman rhetoric.

Anti-feminism is not anti-woman. In fact, feminism is currently the one most anti-woman institution in our culture: feathery-dreamer.tumblr.com/ta…
Also yes, you asked me to stop replying - after showering me with accusations and putting word after word in my mouth. Basically, you made a fuss about the smallest thing I said, then demanded that I stop correcting you about me.
Looks like I am not the harassing one, by far.
> This is precisely why I left this group.
You left this group because you were incapable of accepting that you sometimes get worked up over shit you don't even understand. Good riddance.

> What I am saying, what you are refusing to acknowledge, is that people and institutions (I.E. the MRM) don't take that into account.

You are right, people and institutions don't take into account that good and bad men exist. They automatically assume that men are the offenders, even when evidence is massively in favor of their innocence.
You are wrong, however, to assume that the MRM is among those institutions.
Good job flipping the script without even bothering to check whether it's still true or not.

> -Paul Elam,

AKA an example of an MRA recognized as a misogynist even by anti-feminists.
Even then, he has done more to help men than any raging feminist has done to help oppressed women in the Middle-East.

> And I've just showed you how there is no systematic bias against men in this area.
No, you simply stated it.

> You believe that...
No, I don't. I actually understand this is a statistical generality, not an absolute fact. Unlike you.
With that said, there is massive bias, and if you refuse to see it just because it's on tumblr, you are a moron.

> Your best source is Tumblr?

No, my best source logic.
Tumblr is just a platform I use for it, because I'm tired of visiting dozens of different websites on my slow-as-fuck lagtop just to support the same arguments over and over again against willfully ignorant dimwits like you.
Once more, you didn't even check a link before casting your judgment on it. Small wonder you sound so sheltered.

> However, if you want blogs, I'll give you blogs, along with some reliable sources.

You can cherry-pick examples of MRAssholes, but feminazis are much more numerous to behave the exact same way. I don't even need to look at the most popular ones, but that makes no difference whatsoever.
Furthermore, the MRM is nowhere as influential as feminism among the general public and popular environment. The statements and quotes you provided are hardly consequential in the real world. Unlike their feminist counterparts, which can result in real-world actions.

> who wrote an article giving advice on why you should beat your girlfriend & how you can get away with it
Jezeebel feminazis made an article where they boast about having beat up their boyfriends. Another man was abused by his girlfriend who would post photos of his bruises as "trophies" and was cheered for it by feminists.
Methinks those articles were just satire meant to stir up discussion. Besides, AVFM may be popular, but hardly has any political influence.

>-Erin Pizzey
That awkward moment when one of your "misogynists" is a woman who actually has studied female violence and even had firsthand experience. Every "misogynistic" thing Pizzey ever says is a direct consequence of feminist actions, not patriarchal or MRA influence.

> “Women are the most socially privileged, unabled, propped up & federally funded group in the western world.”
That is not expression of hatred of women, it's a statement of fact. You might think "unabled" goes too far, but feminism really does unable women from thinking and speaking for themselves. See link on top.

> [feminist links]
I thought you said you'd provide reliable sources.
feathery-dreamer.tumblr.com/se…

> Actually, feminists fought for the male birth control pill, not against it. MRAs fought against it, saying it was sexism toward men.
Let me guess - some popular feminist website provided you this bit of (mis)information?

> What an earth will we feminists be blamed for next, global warming? The recession? Or maybe world famine?
No, antifeminists are not generally lunatics who blame feminism for anthropic influence.
Men, though, have been blamed for these things at one point or another. Wars were pointed at as being proof of "toxic masculinity", homophobia and racism were turned into "extensions of misogyny"...
Yes, even poverty and pollution were blamed on the "patriarchy". Strange that feminists argue women would've done things differently, yet saying women's image as more caring is a patriarchal construct.

> You claim that because this boy chose to have sex with a woman, that he was taken advantage of.

*sigh*
For the last. Fucking. Time.
I claim that if this boy's will was weakened by emotion, he was taken advantage of. There are three details you are conveniently blind to here:
1- Emotional weakness is a thing, and it's even harder to deal with because people won't notice it. You are a fine example of that - you are so certain that the boy freely chose to have sex. To you, a boy would have to be intoxicated to the point of unconsciousness, or forcefully restrained, just for it to count as "taking advantage".
It is feminists, not MRAs or their sympathizers, who claim that every sort of straight sex is "rape" of a woman - even when she chooses it.
2- I say "as far as you know". That was very clearly a theoretical statement. I never asserted that it was the case.
Not that you'd know the difference. Everything is clear-cut to you, there is no room for reasonable doubt or theorizing in your thick-walled skull.
3- After the comment with the "as far as you know" bit, I did not once mention the sexual intercourse part again. Only the fact that the woman didn't tell the father she was pregnant.

> There are many forms, and some are consensual
If it's consensual, it's not "taking advantage of". If your will is weakened, your "yes" is not consent.
Small wonder you keep thinking I call all sex "rape".

> Having no interest whatsoever in the child's mother, getting her pregnant, and then dumping her...

1- If he had no interest in her, then she clearly initiated sexual relationship. That's her responsibility, not his.
3- Which also means he didn't "dump her", considering he never was interested in a relationship.
2- He didn't know she was pregnant. You seem to have trouble understanding this. Either that, or you aren't even interested in knowing the facts once you made up an opinion.
This whole paragraph is about you justifying a grown woman not telling a boy he's a father. In other words: "She was right in not informing him she was pregnant, seeing he left her while she was pregnant!"

> yet he didn't bother to keep up with her in the least.
...and she did? She, a grown woman who cared so much about this little boy that she was ready to fuck him to make him happier, kept contact with him afterwards?
Amazing how you pretend to try to be neutral, yet hold the boy alone responsible for what they both did.

> Feminists have done far more than MRAs have without the government's support and in these last couple decades.

Are... Have you been living these decades on the moon?
Feminism is one of the movements that has the largest government support in the world. For someone who values "reliable sources", you sure make some shady claims.

> MRAs are whiny man-children who complain on the internet.
I would provide counter-examples, but I already did and you flatly waved them off.
> But it can't be argued that they're idle.
No indeed. Feminists have done a lot to stop attempts to achieve any kind of equality they don't approve of.

> No child is unwanted. There is always someone who wants them. [...] crisis pregnancies
ROTFL. You actually overtly contradicted your own pathetic little self, princess. In the same paragraph.
> men's shelters
I'm curious to know how many of those there actually are, and how widely known they are. Betcha I can count them on my fingers.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FeatherSpiral [2015-05-14 08:06:50 +0000 UTC]

comments.deviantart.com/1/4412…

First of all, I find it hilarious that this dimwit just blocked me over this discussion.
Thank you, friend, for proving the point that feminists are totally capable of taking constructive criticism and don't shy away from facing facts that don't fit their narrative. This situation definitely illustrates your point that MRAs are willfully ignorant lunatics whereas feminists only want to make the world a more equal place for all.

Moving on to dismantling your already fragile ego with some more solid evidence.

-

feathery-dreamer.tumblr.com/po… <- a bunch of cases of feminists being lunatics. Now you have seen them.
You probably won't click it though, because that's the feminist way.

Wait, so now you alone get to define what feminism is? Not even the movement's actions, not even the dictionary, but your claim?
'K.
By your definition, millions of people in the world are feminists even though they affiliate themselves with the MRM or Egalitarianism. Which is why we don't need any more of it.

Besides, there's a difference between "a few of them get overzealous" and "the leading voices actively shut down opposing viewpoints (including from the population they pretend to represent) because they can't accept the movement is obsolete in some places".

I guess I shouldn't expect much logic from one who considers "plenty of posts from people who educated themselves on feminism's actions, some of whom were feminists themselves" the same as "a couple of angry rants from people who had just been through bad breakups".

-

I would counter your other points, but then I remembered - I already did that a long time ago and you flatly ignored everything.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Crapcarp [2015-04-05 00:41:35 +0000 UTC]

Dude, here's 's latest reply to me on his stamp:

"Because you come off as the kind of guy who gets his shit from Reddit (a site that nobody in the real world even likes nor will even remember 5 years from now). Like I said, job interviews or anyone in real life for that matter will give a fuck if your intention was to "taunt me" or whatever you intend to come here for. When you come into my stamp, you come into my house, when you're in my house, I own your ass. That will never change. Your ass belongs to me."

Seriously, that's a direct quote from him, I'm not kidding.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2