Tieaiel In reply to predbjorn [2010-03-18 00:30:20 +0000 UTC]

Large dog? Really? I'm just a bit confused, is that your own personal euphimism for a certain curse word, is English perhaps your second language, or am I just interpreting this message wrong and "large dog" is just some personal, non-insulting codeword of your respect? Clarification would be greatly appreciated.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

predbjorn In reply to Tieaiel [2010-03-18 09:22:49 +0000 UTC]

WHAT IS LARGE DOG?!
You see, "large dog" is not merely a matter of 'what' and 'why'.
The term 'large dog' covers numerous things: happiness, love, joy, but at the same time despair, angst and absurdity[1]. At the same time, 'large dog' argues against the definition of the human being being primarily rational [2].

Large dog has been applied retrospectively by philosophers for whom existence and, in particular, large dog existence were key philosophical topics [2]. The term "large dog" was coined by French philosophers who used it as a mean to attempt to describe -not explain- these things [3]. Works of great literary geniuses such as Kafka and Dostoyevsky are believed to have deep roots in the large dog thesis [4].

Hope that answers your question.


[1] "Larger than Life" by Frank von Schnitzel, 1964
[2] "Large Dog Resucked", introduction to the book "Throw a Bone" by Vladimir Jakabov, 1936
[3] "Large Dog - a Philosophical Wildcard" by Anthony Hughes, 1925
[4] "The Large Conspiracy" by Mikaël Strunge, 1985

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Demsalian In reply to predbjorn [2010-03-19 17:56:42 +0000 UTC]

Quick question about your arguement there. I don't see any french Philosophers noted in your references, but it is one of the claims you make here. If you could explain it further I am very interested in how a phrase like Large Dog incompasses such a wide variety of topics. to my knowledge no french philosopher that is highly recognized ever mentioned anything about this topic

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Flameburst-88 In reply to Demsalian [2010-03-19 18:11:38 +0000 UTC]

Let me dum this down Predbjorn

Demsalian the person posting is stupid and should fall off a cliff or allow us to laugh at his expense

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Tieaiel In reply to predbjorn [2010-03-18 17:01:56 +0000 UTC]

I have to admit, I'm quite impressed. You put a lot of work into those fake citations, and your definition of the term was quite convincing. If I hadn't tried to research the term to gain a better understanding of it before responding, you would have had me completely fooled. I tip my hat to you, Sir. Certainly, you can talk through your hat better than most people on this site.

I really enjoyed finding that deviantart group you made, #Large-Dog , as well. But now I wonder, what was the point of it? Is it just a place for you and your friends to hang out? 'Cause there's no other members, only three watchers, and nothing's been uploaded yet. And how would you pick a picture for the group? You make it sound like such an abstract philosophical concept and all. Or are you only accepting images of *gasp* rather un-small canines?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Flameburst-88 In reply to predbjorn [2010-03-18 00:01:33 +0000 UTC]

hmm I daresay that you are unknown to me so I shall not reply, in any sane way, towards your random post. Do not feel offended not upset because i shall also not feel anything towards a complete stranger. I ask politely that you remain noninsulting towards me for it will have no effects in any plausible way, I will not be drawn into any incriminating arguements. I have spoken my peace and I ask to not be provoked because should I have to than i most certainly will

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

predbjorn In reply to Flameburst-88 [2010-03-18 09:21:52 +0000 UTC]

It sure does sound like you know who I am.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Flameburst-88 In reply to predbjorn [2010-03-18 15:23:18 +0000 UTC]

well to be completely honest not at all. And in all reality ive never heard of you untill now, so once again feel not offended because I will do the same in regarding you as an unknown person who apparently throws insults at people who do not know them. Unless somewhere I mis translated.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

predbjorn In reply to Flameburst-88 [2010-03-18 16:06:00 +0000 UTC]

What a very strange way to react to a stranger, as if I am some threatening creature.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Flameburst-88 In reply to predbjorn [2010-03-18 16:56:35 +0000 UTC]

my dear sir, do not mistake my impatence with fear because I am threatened by you in no way. To be honest I could care less. I will stress upon the word impatience because I do not know you and honestly do not have the time to be bothered by such that does not concern me. Which unless you have a valid point to stress upon me ends with this final response to your comments.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

predbjorn In reply to Flameburst-88 [2010-03-18 17:59:44 +0000 UTC]

My final point would be only this; STFU.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Tieaiel In reply to predbjorn [2010-03-18 19:29:56 +0000 UTC]

What kind of a final point is "STFU?" It doesn't respond to any of his above posts in a manner that is appropriate. There he is, calmly answering all of your insipid posts (in a conversation YOU started, I might add) and you do nothing but talk to him in a condenscending manner? What does that say of you, good Sir?

I'm afraid to admit it, to one such as yourself, but am completely in the dark as to what prompted this entire conversation in the first place. Might I be bold enough to ask why you felt the need to begin this argument, the climax of which, apparently, is "STFU?" Pray tell, I implore you. Hopefully, it isn't as childish as it is beginning to sound.

Also, I noticed you've yet to respond to my earlier questions regarding the validity of the definitions you tried to feed me. Let me get this straight, you have the time to pull out your vulgar acronym gun and shoot him a reply, but I get nothing? Are you that upset that I caught you in a bold-faced lie, really? I'm feeling rather gypped.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

predbjorn In reply to Tieaiel [2010-03-19 09:05:02 +0000 UTC]

It's like I'm reading Shakespeare here, that's not a compliment. Why can't you two just type in a normal fashion? Are you both studying high ends of language or something? This just seems redundant and rediculous.

STFU derived from his way of adressing me, I have never experienced idiocy like it, to be frank. I acually had something to tell him, or discuss at least, but his ways simply extinguished all will to live.

"I" have (apparently) not responded to you yet, I thought I had. You see, this account is not only run by me, but also by another good friend. This account was made to have a little fun, and in turn others would laugh at us succeeding or failing. We do both. I am by no means upset, it'll take a lot more than that. I am not going to admit that the Large Dog concept is a lie, it's what our excistances are based upon. I suppose it is a matter of belief and mind capacity, perhaps you have not yet grown sufficiently to comprehend Large Dog.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tieaiel In reply to predbjorn [2010-03-19 14:16:18 +0000 UTC]

So, let me get this straight, you think it's redundant and ridiculous because we're able to express our thoughts in a manner other than "OMG, lOl Ur s000 st00pid STFU fag !!!11!!!! ?" (And I've seen people type that way. Thank God you don't appear to be one of them.) That's a shame, because I thought you'd be able to appreciate a more intelligent conversation. Sadly, this isn't even high-end language. It's just what we used in high school everyday (See, we weren't preps or jocks so we learned how to communicate in a non-L337/caveman fashion.) Oh well...

In any case, I do not see how his responses were causing you to "experience idiocy," as you put it. I was falling more under the impression that you (I'll just use "you" from now on, since it can be singular or plural and apparently there is more than person responding to me) were incapable of understanding exactly what he was trying to say to you (which was, I'm fairly certain, something along the lines of "Dude, I have no beef with you so stop trolling my page for no reason.") and were therefore just responding "STFU" to try and hide your confusion. Sort of like how a bully might try to hide the fact that he has no idea what the nerd he's picking on has said to him and just responds "Yeah? Well, you're stupid!" before running away in defeat.

And I'm fairly certain that you're at least a little correct on your last point. If the Large Dog concept is indeed something that you have created, then there's little doubt that I'd be incapable of complete understanding. But why, then, didn't you just come out and say that it was a concept you had created and make an attempt to explain it me instead of B.S.-ing an apparent waste of my time? After all, that attempt to lie made it pretty obvious that at least one of you can type coherently and eloquently when prompted.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

predbjorn In reply to Tieaiel [2010-03-19 17:00:29 +0000 UTC]

There's a very large difference between cave language or leet speak, and what you are putting out. Mind that english is not my first language, you can't just expect everyone and anyone able to usher a word of english will be able to follow your lingo. Fine, you're proud of it and feel like showing off, but I'm just saying that on forums like these, it'll only make you look like an asshat. Just like how you feel the need to explain why you adress me as "you", come on.. How elitist do you need to be? I bet you do the '(no) pun intended' shit too.

It's obvious our perception of idiocy is quite different, I'm not going to discuss this, but I can tell you this much; both you and Flameburst-88 the almighty both come across as super mongs.

You seem to not get that I am a troll. Large Dog is bullshit (it's really not) as you found out, and compiling my first response on what Large Dog acually is took 20 minutes. Our only purpose is to fuck over everyone we come across on this site, we do not care about our reputation or our public standing, call me whatever you want, not a single fuck will be given.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tieaiel In reply to predbjorn [2010-03-19 17:50:51 +0000 UTC]

Let me dumb this down for you:

Does my excellent grasp of my native language make me look like an asshat? Yeah, you're absolutely right, it does. That was kinda the point. But then again, being a troll makes you just as large of one as me.

Did you really feel as though you had to explain to me that you were a troll? Really? It was pretty damn obvious right from the get go that that's all you were. Hence my trolling back. That's right, bee-otch, I'm what's known (at least among my group of friends) as a troll's troll. I may not actively seek fights (because, quite honestly, I rather enjoy not getting banned for being a complete and utter douche-waffle)with other morons, but I sure as hell can hold my own when someone else starts one. Unlike you.

You started this whole damned troll fight, so quit getting so butthurt when we make you look like a dumbass. No wait -scratch that- please continue with your, quite frankly, amusing little posts. Sad as it is to admit it, this is the funnest argument I've ever had. You enjoy fucking people over, so you should really learn to deal with it when the tables are turned.

Believe me, I can continue this conversation as long as it takes, because it seems to me as though I'm pissing you off WAY more than you're affecting me, and as a math nerd with little to no life, the fact that I'm riling you up so much is practically making me orgasm.

Anxiously awaiting a response so we can feed upon your misery. Come on, don't you know how to satisfy a woman?

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

predbjorn In reply to Tieaiel [2010-03-20 13:53:43 +0000 UTC]

I succeeded in seriously pissing your friend off, just by doing not a lot. I'm already winning.
What I don't get is why you think I am riled up, butt hurt and whatever else you said, what do you base that on? I'm just rambling. Suppose you really are an anti social math nerd (nothing wrong with that), you might have a hard time acually knowing when someone is pissed or not. It's a learning process.
Misery? I'm definitely not miserable, at least not compared to certain people I know, or have seen in the streets. Really, this is just a civil online conversation, how can you judge all these things from me at all? Perhaps you can't. Maybe your sense of judgement is falling behind just like your friend flameburst.99's did, he lost it totally now, started swearing at me and everything, still saying he isn't pissed. It's obvious who's trolling now, and it's not me. You do seem to be getting a little uncomfortable too, I think in your best interest, we should hold here. Now I know you are going to brew up a lot of crap on how I am backing out and whatever, well that's alright. Let go some steam if you must.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Flameburst-88 In reply to predbjorn [2010-07-17 21:22:14 +0000 UTC]

Quite hilarious. it seems We have suceeded in completely demeaning you so our task is done. Oh Dear to think he mistakes our pleasure at trolling a troll to be anger. It does seem pitiful how someone cannot handle what they, sadly might I say, attempt. Sigh I grow bored yyet even though it has been so long since I decided to respond to this lesser human I must continue even though this makes me similar I have never been someone to be outdone. The only other whom should respond after this comment should be Tieaiel. Although she will mostly regard you insipid comments as that of a lesser being.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Demsalian In reply to Tieaiel [2010-03-19 18:04:04 +0000 UTC]

well neither have you Flameburst if I am to discern anything from that signature of yours. haha
reading through this was amusing, but I'm really looking forward to hearing more about this Large Dog thing. I would really like him to explain how such a particular can encompass an entire way of life. I'm sure he will also appreciate any questioning of his theory, being so sure of himself.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tieaiel In reply to Demsalian [2010-03-19 18:08:02 +0000 UTC]

Honey pie, he already admitted both that the "large dog" theory was bullshit and that he no speaky the proper engrish so don't expect much in the way of a response.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tieaiel In reply to Tieaiel [2010-03-19 18:14:30 +0000 UTC]

Ooops, let me dumb this down real quick-like for all those out there who may not understand:

Also: Hey, dude. Who you kidding? Can't nobody satify a woman better than me. Ya know, 'cuz I is one!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Flameburst-88 In reply to Tieaiel [2010-03-19 18:16:11 +0000 UTC]

Your write but I can always distinguish the guys who cannot either, trust me *predbjorn definately cannot hahahahaha

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Flameburst-88 In reply to Tieaiel [2010-03-19 17:53:54 +0000 UTC]

Let me dumb this
Tieaiel, now dont you know he has never satisfied a women. Oops let the cat out of the bag...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Flameburst-88 In reply to predbjorn [2010-03-18 18:50:12 +0000 UTC]

hmmm considering i was not going to say anything else on the subject you are quite annoying, I would ask that you stop replying with such childish comments because they do nothing but bring to light your non existing intelligence. Thankfully as a mature person ill use my big boy words as I bat away your immature noneffecting vomit of the mouth insults that are insignificant.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Tieaiel In reply to Flameburst-88 [2010-03-19 14:40:23 +0000 UTC]

Why Flamburst, I'm appalled that you come right out and admit your enjoyment at matching wits with the mentally inferior. For shame, man, for shame! But anyway, on to the main response :

"But I must say, that's one of the most bullshit filled sentences I've heard to date."

You said that? YOU dared to say THAT?!? YOU, (all of you, because like my friend Jerrod there's apparently more than person typing responses at any given time), of all people, dared to say that after feeding me a full referenced, completely bullshit story! Such gall!

You're right, of course. I'll come out and admit the complete and utter immaturity of the two of us continuing this conversation with you after he said he was going to stop. But correct or not, once again YOU have no right whatsoever to call someone else immature. After all, YOU were the one that started this conversation on HIS page. YOU were the one who continued to post your insipid comments after he expressed his desire to end the conversation.

And again, what exactly prompted you to even begin this conversation? I asked you earlier, but once again, the legion that is you decided to ignore that part of my question.

And to paraphrase some of your own words; the fact that you, even now, are continuing this conversation says just as much about your own maturity level as it does mine for writing this response.

-scratch that- You did say that you had something you wanted to discuss with him. May I change my query to "What was it you wanted to discuss?" Because at the moment all we are doing is exchanging witty barbs (at least, we are on this side of the conversation.)

Also, I missed responding to one point of your other response. How exactly is being compared to Shakespeare, one of the greatest literary geniuses in history, supposed to be an insult. I would think it would be more insulting to find oneself incapable of understanding something written by the Bard (or us), but that's just me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

predbjorn In reply to Flameburst-88 [2010-03-19 09:08:37 +0000 UTC]

I'm thrilled.

"Thankfully as a mature person ill use my big boy words as I bat away your immature noneffecting vomit of the mouth insults that are insignificant."

But I must say, that's one of the most bullshit filled sentences I've heard to date. People on this site are always yabbering about maturity, how they are so mature themselves, and using it as a righteous weapon to bash away the trolls and the fith. Fuck that. I find it interesting that all of you who see yourself as super mature, constantly have to remind not only us, but also yourselves about it. It's no surprise though, but it says a lot more about your maturity than anything you would ever be willing to reveal.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Flameburst-88 In reply to predbjorn [2010-03-19 14:28:35 +0000 UTC]

Once again I find myself laughing as you try to offend my ego which is ironic because it seems that your ego is so delicate that it cannot handle much of anything. As you aspire to be petty, I view it as an incoherent ignorance that reveals you below-average intelligence which is incoherent to all but you superficial self cause. You must of failed at Erikson's Industry vs. Inferiority conflict therefore in your quest to hide the fact that you are not inferior to others you act superior in a way that potrays you insufficient mental capabilities.

Back to the subject of my maturity, to be honest you contradicting and trying to overanalyze amuses me because it has no affect upon the outcome of my view concerning your insipid comments. Truly I realize as well that you cannot handle scrutiny, it is quite pathetic especially concerning you try to undermine my maturity which is only there to personify your ignorance even though you try so hard to hide it.

Hmmm it seems to me that your responses lack any logical quality so know that you are as insignificant to me as a speck of dust that floats in the air that I occasionally sanitize. So Know that I look forward to a response because its nice mentally battling with someone who, lets be quite FRANK, can't, and probably never will, be able to keep up with or even insult me in any other way that would cause me to do anything but hysterically laugh.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

predbjorn In reply to Flameburst-88 [2010-03-19 16:49:04 +0000 UTC]

Seems like I succeeded in pissing someone off.
If I am really this insignificant to you, great Flameburst-88, why are you wasting your precious, precious time on me? Surely you must have highly important documents to sign and cigars to smoke.
I'm not trying to be anything at all, unlike you. You can say whatever you want about me, not a single fuck will be given. I will always have Large Dog to cling to, it strengthens me, something you are far too superficial to comprehend. Not even Tieaiel could understand.
You're one of the biggest fools I have yet to come across on this site, if only you were a troll or something, but you're not!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Flameburst-88 In reply to predbjorn [2010-03-19 17:34:22 +0000 UTC]

Ha, Funny. To think that you have angered me. You have have no conceptual abilities. A troll you say, ha, I only argue because it is my nature and I get a kick out of arguements. You honestly are barely a blip, To be honest the reason I talk like I am is because I could care less if English is your second language because it is my first and you are not even worth explaining to

~scratch that~ I will this once. You are a stupid fuck and I dont give a damn about you at all. You only amuse

Get that. Good this conversation is finished.

Goodbye bitch

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

predbjorn In reply to Flameburst-88 [2010-03-20 13:45:00 +0000 UTC]

Hahaha!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Flameburst-88 In reply to jeshans [2010-02-22 16:19:12 +0000 UTC]

i will definately take a look at some of your other works

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jeshans In reply to Flameburst-88 [2010-02-23 14:24:05 +0000 UTC]

thnks a lottttt frnd.here is some more deviations fr u....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Flameburst-88 In reply to atmajakurniawan [2010-02-10 02:35:59 +0000 UTC]

np problem, i really liked your deviation

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Flameburst-88 In reply to Endles [2010-03-08 18:56:24 +0000 UTC]

np, youur deviation was cute

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Flameburst-88 In reply to sindarelf [2010-02-10 02:36:23 +0000 UTC]

np, i really liked your deviation

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Flameburst-88 In reply to NamiDragonGuardian77 [2010-01-01 20:04:04 +0000 UTC]

will do

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NamiDragonGuardian77 In reply to Flameburst-88 [2010-01-01 20:06:08 +0000 UTC]

Tanks!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Flameburst-88 In reply to Tieaiel [2009-12-01 01:41:31 +0000 UTC]

love you too

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tieaiel In reply to Flameburst-88 [2009-12-01 04:59:07 +0000 UTC]

*Mwah

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Flameburst-88 In reply to jigishere [2009-12-01 15:24:55 +0000 UTC]

what is up jille G!!!!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Flameburst-88 In reply to Dark-Rayne-heart [2009-11-19 16:26:01 +0000 UTC]

oh shit lol. well looks like we shall meet at movies lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1