HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS
| JooPe
# Statistics
Favourites: 31; Deviations: 23; Watchers: 39
Watching: 86; Pageviews: 17186; Comments Made: 1855; Friends: 86
# Interests
Favorite visual artist: haFavorite bands / musical artists: Devin Townsend.
Favorite writers: ha
Tools of the Trade: Pencils and pages.
Other Interests: Music mostly.
# About me
There is nothing 'about' me, there is just me.A shadow in the void.
Current Residence: Melbourne.
Favourite genre of music: Anything cold, dark and mechanical. Or really surreal.
Favourite photographer: ha
Favourite style of art: ha
Shell of choice: yeah yeah mine whatever.
Personal Quote: "shutup"
# Comments
Comments: 403
doolhoofd [2014-07-14 19:26:52 +0000 UTC]
There were once three flowers that stood in the field.
The first flower asked the second flower: "What is your name?"
The second flower replied, "My name is Sunflower and I am very large and stand above the rest, I am always positive."
The second flower asked the first flower for its name. The first flower replied, "my name is Rose and I am covered in thorns, but I stand out from the rest, yet I am rather negative."
Both the first and second flower asked the third flower for its name. The third flower replied, "I don’t have a name, I do not stand out, and I do not stand above the rest. I will always be Wistful and I will never be satisfied and I will always want more."
What Is Wistful?What Is Wistful?
Here is a short story?
This is not a fairy tale or an autobiography, although I might say it takes elements from both writing styles. The human mind is puzzling. We can never really truly understand ourselves because we will always have more to learn. By writing this, I wish to ascertain and at the same time I wish to understand. understand what you might ask? Well that is quite a Wistful Question.
We can never fully understand the world as there is always more waiting to be discovered! Although it is this lack of understanding that makes us human and what allows us to be so unique. however this individuality is a large price to pay as it means we will never be truly satisfied. We sometimes believe we are satisfied like when we run into some money, but this is only what we have been conditioned and breed to believe.
As humans, we created the written and verbal language, so that we might be able to communicate more than a few simple grunts. As we create sentences,
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The-Dude-Bro In reply to doolhoofd [2014-07-14 20:00:41 +0000 UTC]
I made the changes. thank you :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lichtie [2014-02-13 20:37:35 +0000 UTC]
Just seen that 'sonrouge' or 'gone sour' (a rather fitting anagram)
is at his usual trollish crap. He has blocked myself and a few others from directly replying to nonsense. He acts all the time like a spoilt, petulant little boy. It will be interesting to see how long it will before he blocks you, for 'daring' to question his infantile nonsense. One of his weak points is any criticism of Ayn Rand, who was as big a nutter as he is. Keep on with the good work!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mercurycode [2013-09-12 07:39:43 +0000 UTC]
Hey there, thanks for the watch. I appreciate it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ThePoorCornelia [2012-09-24 20:40:22 +0000 UTC]
That post on 'Prosux or something's profile, that typographical battle you had with Loveinthesnow (or whatever) was awesome.
>___> Just saying.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JooPe In reply to ThePoorCornelia [2012-09-25 02:31:38 +0000 UTC]
no it was inane, given their utter inability to articulate themselves beyond a 4th grade level. But an effective time-kill.
Who are you, some little suck-up also hoping to join their little club of 'senior' members? Just saying.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
meanus In reply to JooPe [2012-10-02 13:55:19 +0000 UTC]
you got a lot of hate and frustration in you...get a grip on your rage
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JooPe In reply to meanus [2012-10-02 13:58:24 +0000 UTC]
Says the guy who's rage has made him an inarticulate mess
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
meanus In reply to JooPe [2012-10-02 14:02:42 +0000 UTC]
Im a happy kind of sappy guy...I just want to educate you uninformed Aussies who have so little knowledge
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JooPe In reply to meanus [2012-10-02 14:04:35 +0000 UTC]
I'm only half-australian, and you are not in a position to educate anyone give you are both uninformed and a liar.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JooPe In reply to meanus [2012-10-03 00:17:28 +0000 UTC]
"all heads of government agencies are appointed by Obama...he likes to call them Czars and there are shitloads of them. He also appoints all HIGH paying government officials."
[link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JooPe In reply to meanus [2012-10-05 05:09:01 +0000 UTC]
[link]
Honestly, how do you not get sick of being a vacuous moron who is only capable of spewing out inane bullshit? Do you have a medical condition?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JooPe In reply to meanus [2012-10-05 05:58:01 +0000 UTC]
No, oyu are just an idiot, and a liar.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ThePoorCornelia In reply to JooPe [2012-09-25 13:39:03 +0000 UTC]
Why would you take a harsh turn like that? :\
I'm not trying to join anyone's club. I just came to say nice job. Sorry for wasting my time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JooPe In reply to ThePoorCornelia [2012-09-26 13:16:30 +0000 UTC]
Apologies if you were being sincere, but the >___> face and calling an inane internet debate 'awesome' made me assume you were being sarcastic. If not, just chalk it up to the fact that 98%+ of the comments I get are like that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ThePoorCornelia In reply to JooPe [2012-09-26 13:19:14 +0000 UTC]
Ah, I see. I was being sincere. I just put that face behind a lot of things, out of habit.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JooPe In reply to SaixLuver-VII [2012-09-20 00:25:05 +0000 UTC]
I am not fit to be anyone's hero. Unless you were being sarcastic/ironic, I really don't think my fragile ego could handle that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SaixLuver-VII In reply to JooPe [2012-09-20 00:58:26 +0000 UTC]
Then I clap to you sir.
(No really, You are awesome)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JooPe In reply to SaixLuver-VII [2012-09-21 08:49:29 +0000 UTC]
Yaaay I have a fan, I think.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
maddmatt [2012-05-11 04:12:52 +0000 UTC]
Just letting you know that your massive spamming is against DA policy and has been reported.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
JooPe In reply to maddmatt [2012-05-11 05:23:26 +0000 UTC]
You also could have blocked me to prevent the 'spamming', but I guess that requires you to admit to yourself that you are in denial of something?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
maddmatt In reply to JooPe [2012-05-11 05:25:40 +0000 UTC]
I don't need to block you. Serious responses are still welcome. Spam is not and a violation.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JooPe In reply to maddmatt [2012-05-11 05:28:09 +0000 UTC]
It's not spam: it's you refusing to answer the question and simply resorting to censorship. You asked me to send you a note, which i did, to no response.
What exactly did you mean by "...right and wrong is wrong. But no right and wrong is right...", if not to define my position as 'all morality is wrong, no morality is right'?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
maddmatt In reply to JooPe [2012-05-11 16:40:48 +0000 UTC]
I responded.
And you are flooding the same message dozens of times to my profile page, my inbox, and on all my deviations.
This is spam and against policy. Sorry you have these mental control issues. I hope you are getting help from the right places after your are banned.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JooPe In reply to maddmatt [2012-05-12 07:36:13 +0000 UTC]
You 'responded', but you did not answer the question.
I am not flooding the same message, I merely repeat it once each time you delete it. If you want it to stop, all you have to do is answer the question, or block me, the power to resolve the situation is entirely in your hands.
I am sorry you suffer from this cognitive dissonance.
What exactly did you mean by "...right and wrong is wrong. But no right and wrong is right...", if not to define my position as 'all morality is wrong, no morality is right'?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JooPe In reply to maddmatt [2012-05-11 05:22:22 +0000 UTC]
A pity cognitive dissonance isn't against dA policy.
Either way your complaint is invalid, considering you could have ended the 'spamming' any time by simply answering the question:
What exactly did you mean by "...right and wrong is wrong. But no right and wrong is right...", if not to define my position as 'all morality is wrong, no morality is right'?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
maddmatt In reply to JooPe [2012-05-11 05:27:10 +0000 UTC]
I did answer it. Your obsession led you to spam...which you continue.
Hope you don't get banned out of sheer obsession over me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JooPe In reply to maddmatt [2012-05-11 05:29:05 +0000 UTC]
No, you didn't. If you wish to insist that you did, feel free to repeat such answer.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
maddmatt In reply to JooPe [2012-05-11 16:39:30 +0000 UTC]
That was months ago and you never acknowledged it then either. So continue your obsession until your banned.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JooPe In reply to maddmatt [2012-05-12 07:39:32 +0000 UTC]
Well, I'm sure you can either recall what was said, or re-articulate it since I doubt your views have changed since then. Unless, you never actually answered the question to begin with?
Unless you are willing to fellate an admin, I don't see myself getting banned, since all you have to do to end this is block me (which I assume means admitting defeat/denial to yourself), or simply answer the question.
What exactly did you mean by "...right and wrong is wrong. But no right and wrong is right...", if not to define my position as 'all morality is wrong, no morality is right'?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RedTweny [2012-03-07 05:59:13 +0000 UTC]
THX for having spent some your minutes in my gallery and for the watch....very appreciated !
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JooPe In reply to Rasec-Wizzlbang [2012-01-19 08:24:42 +0000 UTC]
No, the space in my sig. is reserved for people who block due to being backed into a corner during an argument.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JooPe In reply to Rasec-Wizzlbang [2012-01-19 09:38:50 +0000 UTC]
And what? I answered your question.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JooPe In reply to Rasec-Wizzlbang [2012-01-19 15:09:39 +0000 UTC]
"No, the space in my sig. is reserved for people who block due to being backed into a corner during an argument."
Yes, I did. Are you being asinine on purpose or does it come naturally to you? If yo are unable to read a simple sentence to answer your question, why don't you just block me and find out?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>