HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS

| TaffGoch

TaffGoch [16992482] [2011-03-22 01:43:17 +0000 UTC] "Physicist/geometer" (United States)

# Statistics

Favourites: 84; Deviations: 97; Watchers: 233

Watching: 52; Pageviews: 74346; Comments Made: 337; Friends: 52

# About me

If you can't tell, already, I'm enamored of geodesic constructs.

It is my hope that these deviations will inspire others.

Physicist/geometer,
-Taff
_________________________________

If you ever need help with the geometry of geodesic domes (or spheres,) there is help available:

Geodesic Help Group (Google Group)

# Comments

Comments: 71

haeylee [2022-03-21 14:05:47 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TaffGoch In reply to haeylee [2022-03-22 00:42:26 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

colundi [2018-02-28 16:25:41 +0000 UTC]

dear TG, u kindly rendered a hexagon planet for me on geodesic help group for me recently, please would you like to help with our album artwork by supplying hi res images/variations, as outlined in my post. happy to credit you and donate modestly, it's just a small release. but your findings would make it huge. respect is due and thanks, best wishes, colundi everyOne

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mann-of-LaMancha [2014-12-03 02:48:39 +0000 UTC]

Say, by any chance did you notice this study I did on SU and the results of saving in different styles, or is this common knowledge?

mann-of-lamancha.deviantart.co…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TaffGoch In reply to Mann-of-LaMancha [2014-12-03 23:50:44 +0000 UTC]

Don,

I had not seen your study, but I do, personally, take full advantage of components (as opposed to groups,) because of the file-size savings.

It should be common knowledge, since it's in the "SketchUp Users Guide,"Β but many don't read it (or, even, know about it.)

-Taff

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Mann-of-LaMancha In reply to TaffGoch [2014-12-04 00:30:46 +0000 UTC]

Well the point was about components but also what view style you save your work in.

Yup, I didn't know about it. Thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mann-of-LaMancha [2014-11-26 07:53:48 +0000 UTC]

Say, do you use this www.instructables.com/id/Const… geodesic sphere for your spheres? It gripes me out that it isn't made of regular shapes.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TaffGoch In reply to Mann-of-LaMancha [2014-11-26 16:37:32 +0000 UTC]

While I do use SketchUp, that tutorial subdivision "method" is only one of many. (If I recall correctly, >9 methods have been documented.)

The only convex polyhedra that can be constructed of equilateral triangles are the tetrahedron, octahedron and icosahedron. To produce greater complexity (and more-closely approximate a sphere,) irregular triangles must be introduced. If the solid surface is allowed both, concave and convex regions, then Lobel frames, employing equilateral triangles, can be a (rather odd) solution:

Β  3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/model…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Mann-of-LaMancha In reply to TaffGoch [2014-11-26 18:30:43 +0000 UTC]

Thanks.

I wasn't necessarily thinking of equilaterals and should have said fewer regular shapes. I think in years past I had found those tetra's, octa's and iso's but due to senility or an early case of alzheimer's I couldn't find any tutorials for the past couple of weeks, except that link I mentioned. More exactly, I was thinking of Epcot's Space Ship Earth which, in my mind's eye, I thought was made from two or three regular triangles reiterated to make a sphere. Imagine my embarrassment when I just looked it up (having only now remembered it's name) and found it actually has a lot of "fudging."

As a matter of fact, I think I just remembered a previous search for geodesic tutorials that I found by looking up "soccer ball" so I'll try that now...

My apologies if I was a bother and my thanks for your help.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TaffGoch In reply to Mann-of-LaMancha [2014-11-26 22:34:15 +0000 UTC]

Spaceship Earth (Epcot) is, indeed, visually deceiving. If recollection serves, there are about 40 different triangle definitions:
3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/model…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Mann-of-LaMancha In reply to TaffGoch [2014-11-27 09:22:30 +0000 UTC]

Is there any sphere you HAVEN'T done??

That is an awesome bit of modeling. 40 different instances of triangles, eh? Yikes!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

fractalyst [2014-10-09 10:03:52 +0000 UTC]

thanks for the adwatch!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

nic022 [2014-09-16 06:27:04 +0000 UTC]

Hello, thank you a lot for the watchΒ Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BeeVomit [2014-08-18 20:52:13 +0000 UTC]

Found Domerama online. Blew me away! Never thought such a comprehensive resource existed. Makes me wonder why I'd never seen it before.. hum. I'll be checking in from time to time, you got some great work up here. Cheers!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TaffGoch In reply to BeeVomit [2014-08-18 21:51:59 +0000 UTC]

Dan,

Funny thing: Most of my work doesn't show up in Google searches. (I have no idea why.) Generally, people find me & my geodesic constructs through links at other websites (like Domerama.)

I hope you find things, not only visually appealing, but technically helpful, as well.

-Taff

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

unusualsuspex [2014-07-16 22:57:10 +0000 UTC]

Thanks so much for theΒ , hope I can live up to your expectations!!Β 

And thanks for sharing the models too!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Helioth [2014-05-21 15:31:22 +0000 UTC]

thanks for the +fav

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

OrientalArc [2013-12-28 01:58:09 +0000 UTC]

Your work is fantastic.. I am drawn towards your forms and animation.. wonderful...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TaffGoch In reply to OrientalArc [2013-12-28 03:00:25 +0000 UTC]

A forty-year obsession, I'm afraid to admit....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

graphrainbow [2013-12-24 05:23:40 +0000 UTC]

Hi
Your gallary is just like my ideas now. I'm making sime calcs with spheres and some time I'll ask for help. Happy to find you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TaffGoch In reply to graphrainbow [2013-12-24 20:57:21 +0000 UTC]

Feel free to ask. I don't know that I can help much with calculations. Except for the phyllotaxis deviations, I didn't use calculations -- I employ geometric construction methods.


Hopefully, however, I should be able to point you in the right direction.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

domedimensions [2013-12-08 02:24:56 +0000 UTC]

love the passion you have for this Taff , leith -`ღ´-

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

worldmodern [2013-08-09 15:01:13 +0000 UTC]

Hi Taff Goch! Β Β 


Your 92 gears are blowing my mind.


I found it searching for ideas for a graphic to represent our event management application - showing that it is one integrated system with components engineered to work together.


1. Β Could we use this as-is on our website? Β We can add attribution as you require.


2. Β Even more amazing would be if we could label each large gear with the name of one of our subsystems. Β  is it possible to make such a variant of the animation?


Thanks!

Kurt

Modern Logic International



πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mostercanada [2013-06-07 19:27:08 +0000 UTC]

Taff, I have been inspired by your work. Where can I email you a question? thx Michael

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TaffGoch In reply to mostercanada [2013-06-08 00:57:19 +0000 UTC]

Michael,

You can always contact me at the Geodesic Help Group

...or, you can use the deviantART PM system.

-Taff

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MrsMable [2013-04-21 03:20:01 +0000 UTC]

Hello! Your stuff is amazing! I am a computer art teacher and would love to have my students work towards something like this. I am also interested in using your gear sphere (the one in primary colors) on a website. Would that be something you are open to? Of course your work would be cited with proper links. Thanks so much!
Erin

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TaffGoch In reply to MrsMable [2013-04-22 01:08:22 +0000 UTC]

Erin,

Teach away, with whatever I've posted.

I only wish that the primary polyhedra had been addressed in more detail, when I was in school. I self-taught myself geodesic math (spherical trig,) after college, over 35 years ago. I hope that something in my "art" collection will inspire some degree of interest in at least a few of your students.

Attribution of any use on your website is appreciated.

-Taff

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

guitarblaster [2012-10-24 22:20:30 +0000 UTC]

Hi there Taff,

Sent you a note about using one of your models.
Let me know what you think!

Thanks.

Chris

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Helioth [2012-09-17 12:41:10 +0000 UTC]

wow, what a wonderful resource!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TaffGoch In reply to Helioth [2012-09-17 18:37:07 +0000 UTC]

As a resource, I hope you find something upon which you can produce new devations.

(Or, at least, something inspires you....)

-Taff

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Jacantdesign [2012-09-16 18:07:14 +0000 UTC]

Hi Taff,
You might be interested in this
[link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TaffGoch In reply to Jacantdesign [2012-09-17 18:43:25 +0000 UTC]

Thanks,

I looked at the challenge, and produced the following: Polyhedron: 16-Sided

Only problem is that it can't serve as "dice," since there are no parallel faces, so a number can't display on a (non-existent) top face.

Interesting exercise, nevertheless....

-Taff

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TaffGoch [2012-06-27 19:50:34 +0000 UTC]

I can help.

I sent you a longer description, at your pages.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bear48 [2012-06-27 18:40:19 +0000 UTC]

I love your gallery

Do you have and advice on drawing multi-legged spirals?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Kit-Elliott [2012-01-31 20:25:04 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much for the - I hope you enjoy what I come up with! Nice to see a fellow physicist on DA too!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Snohyn [2011-11-11 09:08:57 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for the fave.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

GerardoGarcia [2011-10-09 10:13:40 +0000 UTC]

Hello,

I have some questions related to the modification/use of your sketchup Zapoche/Holywood hills models for an entry in the BFI Challenge. At the same time, we'd be honoured to inviite you to be a honorary/active sponsor of our project. It is a building for the empowermente of handicapped group. Thanks in advance Gerardo GarcΓ­a (garciacabrero@yahoo.com).

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

emptynest313 [2011-10-03 19:16:28 +0000 UTC]

TaffGoch I am new to this site but I just sent you a long winded note and really need your expertise - I am stuck. Thank you. Pam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

jsp7707 [2011-09-26 05:02:42 +0000 UTC]

Very nice Gallery!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TaffGoch In reply to jsp7707 [2011-09-26 20:10:38 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, Jeff,

After seeing your gears & geodesics, I reckoned you might find mine mutually-interesting.

-Taff

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

kuzy62 [2011-08-07 13:09:56 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TaffGoch In reply to kuzy62 [2011-08-07 19:41:22 +0000 UTC]

I thought that I'd done that a while ago...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

billybob884 [2011-07-25 08:42:08 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Dragantia [2011-06-15 11:52:44 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for adding me to your watch.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

casteeld [2011-06-12 11:39:06 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for your and comment on "Stereo Lightning AAA-000"

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Schmiegel [2011-05-25 19:57:58 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the watch - well, these thingies here are really worth a watch too - so feel watched

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TaffGoch In reply to Schmiegel [2011-05-25 20:19:37 +0000 UTC]

I'm gratified that you find my deviations worth watching

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Schmiegel In reply to TaffGoch [2011-05-25 21:26:59 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

Never thought that Sketchup could be useful for algorithmic tasks! So I just wonder if e.g. Structure Synth would be useful for your spheres...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TaffGoch In reply to Schmiegel [2011-05-26 00:08:27 +0000 UTC]

I'll certainly take a look at it....

-Taff>/b>

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ElectricCoffee [2011-05-19 21:05:37 +0000 UTC]

as cool as your gallery is, I can't help but feel it's a bit too monotone...
every single entry seems to be a slightly different polyhedron, chain-ball or geodesic sphere...
all I ask for is a bit of variety, something that will show the full potential of the 3d artist in you...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>