HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS
| TheAmericanKaiser
TheAmericanKaiser
♂️
[11239640]
[2009-08-06 22:48:13 +0000 UTC]
"I'm watching you while you sleep"
(United States)
# Statistics
Favourites: 279; Deviations: 258; Watchers: 68
Watching: 271; Pageviews: 44406; Comments Made: 3394; Friends: 271
# Interests
Favorite movies: I DON'T WATCH MOVIES ANYMOREFavorite TV shows: Deez Nuts
Favorite bands / musical artists: Video Game Music And Dumb Anime Soundtracks
Favorite books: Fuck Books.
Favorite games: Too many to count.
Favorite gaming platform: PC only ever since the Rona.
Tools of the Trade: Editing Videos
# Social Links
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuaCUEd5ZqpsNgbR7kGEw0w# Comments
Comments: 1716
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Hey Kaiser not sure if here but I made a post here DA on certain anime genre let me know what you think
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Cool. I'm not too active on DA, but cool.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
nice stamps my dude
I had some anti-sjw stamps myself and stuff related to that but i took them off my page because people could totally use them against me on this site. However it's always good to see that dA isn't limited to the typical Tumblr ideologies and all that shit.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sorry for the late reply. It was the holidays, and I'm easily distracted by masturbation. I would personally never take them off. If someone finds out I don't like being the typical milady fedora tipping snowflake cuck on Tumblr, they can jump in a river and drown for all I care.
It's just a personal integrity kind of thing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Thanks. Haven't been doing much here lately since I've been busy with other things, so a late reply.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Wow, when you commented on my profile, I thought you were just some cringey troll.
Looking through your journals and the shit you post, I can see now that that is absolutely true.
SJW's really trigger you, huh? Noted.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Doesn't change that you have horribly shit knowledge on how logic works when power scaling dude.
Your death battles were so full of weeaboo head canon that it's like you were confused and mixed up fanfiction with death battles. Though they might overlap at times.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hello! I appreciate your feedback, and I am working on it immediately!
...As soon as I give a shit about you and your anti-SJW troll trash.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
As soon as you stop being trash that is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I am under the impression that anyone you call trash is actually just someone you harbor some serious resentment toward, and is immaturely projected in the form of ridiculous insults.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's cause your trash. It's like you can't accept that being a minority is not a ticket to being oppressed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh, how brave of you. Mediocre man literally no one asked bravely accepts to take devil's advocate position. Oh, how we needed someone like you.
Also, way to exaggerate. Of course you'd say "oppressed" and not "systemically held back" or something to that effect.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's not a Devil's Advocate position dumbass. It's just pure unbridled logic. It's like you think you can just call a concept a different name and get away with applying it to a minority solely on being a minority.
Guess what, you're just dumb.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"These insecurities ain't gonna project themselves"
What pure unbridled logic? I've seen literally zero from you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Because you wouldn't know logic even if you had a private tutor living in your head, teaching you this stuff 24/7. Whites DON'T owe blacks reparations as a whole. Whites are not all slave owners now or before in their lives. Skin color doesn't automatically choose who's oppressed and not. It's logic, something you lack in debates on politics, and death battles.
You're just fucking dumb. Probably either a super skinny white male or a fat white male. Always exceptions though. But they don't speak for the majority.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Okaaaaayyyyyy there's a lot to unpack here
First off, nuance, do you know what that is? I don't think so.
"Whites DON'T owe blacks reparations as a whole." - When did I say they did? Right off the bat, you're hitting me with a bunch of strawman arguments, even though I never said any of that shit.
So, nuance, learn what it is, or don't debate politics. It's funny that you say I don't use logic, when you're the one being functionally devoid of it in any argument whatsoever. Why don't you just get this over with and call me a cuck or something? It'd make this easier for both of us.
"You're just fucking dumb." - Strong words coming from you.
"Probably either a super skinny white male or a fat white male." - Wait a minute, weren't you the one saying that skin color and appearance don't matter? Ironic, isn't it? Nuance, you lack.
Honestly, seeing you give your fake arguments in an attempt to be contrarian is hilarious. Keep going.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
There is no nuance in this discussion. Minorities are not oppressed because of being minorities. Not all whites owned slaves. Every nation had slaves, and every race was a slave to another at one point. Get over it. History will decide. Not your pathological disgusting need to be altruistic.
Honestly, seeing you give the same illogical nonfactual SJW arguments time and time again in attempts to be what you think is the right, and social norm, is absolutely disgusting.
Point is that SJWism is wrong. Get over it you dumb fat virgin fuck. It's one thing to be a virgin. But a fat virgin fuck? You're doomed for being the kind of trash you find at the worst of anime conventions. No joke. You're that pathetic.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"There is no nuance in this discussion." And you've already lost me, again.
"Minorities are not oppressed because of being minorities. Not all whites owned slaves. Every nation had slaves, and every race was a slave to another at one point. Get over it. History will decide. Not your pathological disgusting need to be altruistic." What matters is how it all impacts us today. I would explain it, but other people have explained it in much better detail than I have. History is almost always told from the perspective of the colonials, and it's usually revised to make them not seem like such villains.
"Honestly, seeing you give the same illogical nonfactual SJW arguments time and time again in attempts to be what you think is the right, and social norm, is absolutely disgusting." And yet you spewing out these buzzwords and telling minorities to just "get over it" isn't disgusting? You have some weird priorities.
"Point is that SJWism is wrong."
Wait a minute...
"Not your pathological disgusting need to be altruistic."
But,
"Point is that SJWism is wrong."
Yet,
"Not your pathological disgusting need to be altruistic."
At the same time,
"Point is that SJWism is wrong."
Pick. One. Are you going to tell me that I have some pathological, disgusting need to be altruistic, while saying that something I do is... wrong? Just... wrong? Man, if anything, you are the one who sounds like they have some pathological, disgusting need to be altruistic.
"Get over it you dumb fat virgin fuck."
Aaaaaaand now you're projecting again.
"It's one thing to be a virgin. But a fat virgin fuck? You're doomed for being the kind of trash you find at the worst of anime conventions. No joke. You're that pathetic." Even though most "fat virgin fucks" I know are the ones who spout your same kind of rhetoric and think that women owe them sex, and think that they all only go for douchebags (which isn't even remotely true, or else these same guys would be attracting women). Which is kind of the opposite of my mentality there. Is this how low you're going to stoop? You've run out of arguments, so you've just resorted to using middle-school insults? I swear, you have the intellectual capabilities of a seven-year-old who thinks he's mature because he watched one episode of Family Guy. No, less than that. No, not even that. You're not dumb. You're just gleefully ignorant. Why do I say that? I've known people with actual learning disabilities engage in more thoughtful conversations than you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Or you're the one who's clearly not getting with the, as an SJW like Justin Trudeau would say. current year.
You haven't known shit. You've been told someone has disabilities. But you don't understand jack shit about nuance or how they work. Point is that blaming white people isn't thoughtful. Blaming majorities isn't thoughtful. You're sorely lacking in any form of logic when you spray the same SJW bullshit of pathological altruism that requires you to be willing to bow like a slave just for someones feelings, or risk death by some angry mob because you said "one bad word".
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Shit. Did you just compare me to Justin Trudeau, liberal hero? Fuck, I must be doing this Leftist thing all wrong if I'm being compared to liberals.
"Point is that blaming white people isn't thoughtful." I'm not blaming white people as a whole, it's just that a lot of the people who have caused these problems happen to be white.
"Blaming majorities isn't thoughtful." I'm not necessarily blaming majorities either, just that a lot of majorities happen to have been the ones to have caused these problems. There IS a difference.
"You're sorely lacking in any form of logic when you spray the same SJW bullshit of pathological altruism that requires you to be willing to bow like a slave just for someones feelings, or risk death by some angry mob because you said "one bad word"." But... you have shown exactly ZERO logic yourself... practice what you preach, man. And don't say anything about me being a slave until you recognize the irony in your own statement. I mean, you do spout a lot of the same rhetoric I see on right-wing "redpill" sites (also, isn't it hilarious how all these "redpillers" are using a term used from a movie directed by two transgender women, and about a black man and a woman teaching a white man about how the world really works? Kind of ironic). In a sense... doesn't that make YOU a slave to rhetoric as well?
"Bow like a slave for someone's feelings" Because redpillers and right-wingers don't do that? Even though they throw a fit when someone does so much as imply that perhaps white men have had it easier than others historically (not necessarily that they all have it easy)? Not to mention that people like you are so incredibly fragile when the media gets "politically correct". As if everything should bend for YOUR feelings too.
"Risk death by some angry mob because you said "one bad word"." Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Because YouTube feminists and leftists don't receive death threats on the daily. Oh wait, they do.
Don't preach to me about "pathological altruism" when you do exactly the same, and don't tell me about how I don't follow logic when you have presented exactly no logic whatsoever during this entire argument.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's just that you haven't proven anything is related to whites any more than a religious right winger has proven it's related to black people.
You have nothing but arguments with no backbone. Like a typical libtards fuck.
Learn the difference between altruism, and trying to tell you off.
Sor get some relevant statistics or get out of your mother's disgusting basement. Milady will not love you there.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And you're implying that your arguments are any more than what mine are? You haven't backed up a single argument yourself. Shouting buzzwords like "libtard" aren't going to help your case either.
BTW, I'm an anarchist, not a liberal. But, you know, not that that matters to you.
And the keyword is "trying". You're not succeeding at telling me off whatsoever.
And "mother's disgusting basement". My girlfriend would find that statement hilarious.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yes, mine are. Because mine aren't based around ideology. Present me with real relevant statistics for the trite SJW'S spew.
And by the way, being an anarchist doesn't mean shit when you spew SJW shit.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"Yes, mine are."
Wow, could you get any more altruistic than this? You have to be the most self-righteous fuck I've ever heard. Your rhetoric is no different from every single anti-SJW on YouTube who spouts the same tired mantras about how much they hate SJW's and how enlightened they are. Man, you must feel so clever, so brilliant. Like you're some savior of our generation. Einstein and Tesla would be astounded at your brilliance.
You want actual statistics? Where do you want me to begin? How about at the fact that white people make up about 62% of the population, but make up about 91% of the positions of power in the United States? Or the fact that minorities are 2.5 times more likely to be killed than whites by police? (Oh, and don't think that saying that more whites are overall killed by police will help your case; they make up a significantly higher portion of the population and when you observe the ratio of the population to those killed by police, the numbers aren't even close) I could go on and on. What numbers do you have? Why haven't you shown my any sort of numbers yet?
But, you know, you can just say I'm "triggered" and laugh about it and pretend like you just "REKT" me in a debate. Because that's how anti-SJW logic works.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's not altruism to tell a piece of shit to fuck off with ideological bullshit that's based on virtue signaling bullshit.
You want the right to say you gave statistics? Then link. Not speak. Anyone can type. So get over it, and get rekt. Now get over it. Anti-SJW logic only works like that if you're dealing with a closeted SJW. You're wrong, get over it.
White people do NOT make up the majority of the people with privilege. Not till you present actual truthful statistics.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You have literally presented no arguments yourself. And let's talk about that term, "virtue signaling":
www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAmM87…
This will explain why the term "virtue signaling" is so bullshit. Just like every anti-SJW "logic" I've ever heard. Don't tell me that I'm wrong if you're literally going to give me zero reason why.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No, it didn't explain shit. Virtue signaling is when you claim your point is not wrong simply because it would seem immoral to have a different opinion because someone gets hurt by the end result.
Life. It does that. Boo hoo. Whites are not at fault for slavery. Everyone equally had slaves. All races conducted slave trading.
Statistics to prove whites are the most privileged, even when homeless, or drink bleach.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wealth privilege is a thing too, y'know. Also I just showed you statistics, while you've shown me jack shit.
And by saying that I'm virtue signaling, aren't you virtue signaling yourself?
And telling me to kill myself, how original. Man, that is some A-grade comedy right there. Didn't even see that one coming. Shakespeare himself would be astounded at your humor.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wealth privilege is not a white thing y'know. You linked nothing but spewing a bunch of repetitive mantras of the SJW cult.
You truly are virtue signaling by claiming that whites and the government are oppressing blacks to make whites privileged. Like, look how rich they are, look how poor this white person is! You should want to protest and be for black lives matter, despite their own racist dogma.
You do need to KYS. You've got some a grade Tumblr level faggotry in your ass. I bet you wouldn't even actually be able to comprehend the works of Shakespeare, let alone alphabets being made in your soup.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Name-calling, nice. I've never heard that one before.
And I just said wealth privilege is a thing, not that it is inherently a white thing. You're putting words in my mouth. And calling BLM racist? Yawn... that's an old, stale argument. BLM is about improving police/minority relations (even though IMO we should just do away with police in general but that's a topic for another time), but of course those with closed and simple minds such as yourself cannot comprehend such a profound concept.
And you're still on this "kill yourself" thing? That's a laugh. I've literally never once in my life heard something less threatening. You know, I'm gonna keep myself alive just because you want me dead so much. Guess what, I'm still alive, and if I do die, it won't be because I did it myself.
Quite a bold claim to be telling me I can't comprehend alphabets in my soup, especially from someone as idiotic and brainless as yourself. Oh wait, that's kind of ableist. I know people who are actually mentally disabled and are still less ignorant and more competent than yourself.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Nice job failing to provide actual arguments, again.
Wealth privilege is a thing. But not what you think it is. There is no 1% that Bernie speaks of.
Nice job with the typical "BLM IS THIS DEFINITION".
I bet if an MRA killed someone, and I said the supposed argument of "THIS IS THE DEFINITION OF MRA", you'd have said to fuck off. BLM is not an exceptiom retard. Written rule does NOT determine intent. Of course actual racists would go by definitions alone.
Fucking hilariois how unaware of your down syndrome levels of retardation.
You are wrong. Period.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bernie Sanders, really? What do you think I am, a fucking liberal?
Also, an MRA did kill someone. You know Elliot Rodger? Yep, he frequented MRA forums. So that actually did happen.
And of course you'd ignore something's intended purpose just to further your own reactionary agenda. Of course you'd cherry-pick your own arguments to make yourself better.
Also, do you notice the irony of calling me stupid while misspelling "hilarious"? I mean, not that that is an actual argument whatsoever, just thought that was funny. And what's even more funny is how transparent your ableism is.
You know, there's this one lady I know who wears diapers. Not because she has any bladder issues, she just likes to wear them. She also wears baby clothes, eats baby food, and sometimes talks in gibberish. We don't know why, she just does.
And yet, not even she acts nearly as much like a baby as you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
tl;dr means you must not be smart enough to read.
Oh, when did you have to be a liberal to like Bernie? You can easily be a democrat. Though I bet you consider yourself liberal despite your pathetic attempt at at it. Not that you would know how politics work.
An MRA did it. Where did Elliot self identify as an MRA? Citations? Where in his manifesto did he do that? Citations for the MRA motto of kill women, yet end up killing majority men? Do your research before you use a pathetic little cuck like Elliot to further your goal. The point is you're claiming someone is an MRA to support a hatred of them as a whole, like with how people use specific cases for white privilege. At least with the coming times, people have brought up points that support the idea that Feminism is dead. Like the legal right of a woman to live for 18 years and vote, versus men having to sign up for what used to be called the draft, and is now selective service, but will become the draft when we go to war. You don't even know what activism is. You're just using the typical Feminist response of "the definition excuses my actions of being considered wrong".
Do you notice the irony of you claiming white people are the most privileged, yet they are the race most demonized by the media, let alone you being white yourself? Pathetic. What's funny is how transparent your white guilt is. Maybe dumb cucks deserve to feel guilty, for being disgraces to the gene pool.
It hilarious how you think you're less of a baby than me, when you're the one supporting a movement that just cares about entitlements for their specific race at the expense of another, due to gut feelings that racism is at hand for all your troubles, and not just you being a lazy fat, or overly skinny fuck.
So let's go over what you learned today...
Elliot Rodgers had a manifesto: abclocal.go.com/three/kabc/kab…
Elliot Rodgers Reality: He said he wanted to kill tons of women and men. Never just women. A lot of his hatred was women, but men too, in case it's too hard for you to realize hatred can be pretty equal. But the dumb fuck killed more men than women in the end. He killed 6 people, 4 of which were men, and they were close to him. Two were roommates of equally similar life styles, and a close friend. He also was bi racial.
Citations (Something you've never heard of or seen before)
Elliot Rodgers was bi racial: www.alternet.org/culture/8-thi…
Elliot killed 4 men: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Isl…
A direct quote so your simple ass can just ctrl+F this shit: Rodger began his attacks at his apartment on Seville Road, where three men were found dead inside.[6] [7] Each victim had received multiple stab wounds,[6] [7] [8] and all had been killed approximately three hours before the shooting spree. Their bodies were found the day following the shootings. They were identified as Rodger's roommates, Weihan Wang and Cheng Hong, and a friend named George Chen.[9]
The victims names can be seen here: murderpedia.org/male.R/r/rodge…
So in class, we learned that Elliot is not a sure sign of MRA behavior, nor does the MRA have any direct link to it if we go by the people he killed. Nor did he identify. Does that mean an MRA is excused by his definition? Only if we follow your logic.
Basically, you suck at research, and you just listen to mainstream media like a fucking zombie. It's hilarious how Elliot Rodgers has become the go to Feminist argument for why MRA's are bad, when they don't bother to know the definition, and just put shit in. Point is the definition is a definition of activism. Activism dies when you get what you want. And women don't lack rights that men have. So you preach an ideology in your SJW shit. There are no lack of legal rights because of white privilege. It is written in law that it is illegal, and companies have time and time again proven to not think highly of white people for being white people based on how they fire white people for the simplest of transgressions.
It's also funny that the most horrible person to Elliot wasn't his dad, the one person he would hesitate to kill, but his bitch of a mother, who would do everything to treat Elliot as if he were a rival for his fathers affections and keep the two apart.
It's also funny how a retarded Youtuber on the internet pretending to be a primate knows more about the shit you talk about than you.
Mumkey Jones providing actual facts about Elliot Rodgers and his cuckling ass that you could never provide before talking about: www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUKRv3…
Become educated before you think you can educate others retard.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I am absolutely not a liberal, nor anywhere close to one. If anything, you should learn how politics work.
Liberals believe capitalism to be a fixable system which is just broken, leftists (like me) understand that capitalism is working as it should and absolutely needs to be abolished.
Anyway, let's tear apart your argument.
First off, Elliot Rodger didn't need to self-identify as an MRA to be consistent with MRA philosophies. Why then, is he so revered among MRA circles, hmm? Why do self-identifying MRA's look up to him, or sympathize with him? Why is it that incel circles see him as some sort of god?
Also, your grasp on what an MRA actually is seems to be completely inconsistent. You're here implying that Elliot Rodger couldn't be an MRA because he hated men too, and that a real MRA wouldn't actually do that. Yet, earlier you tried to defend MRA's by saying that "if they killed someone, then X", implying that you yourself have MRA tendencies yourself. But then you go and call men you disagree with "cucks" or shame men you don't like. So, what is it, hmm? Does that mean you can't be an MRA? Nothing about your arguments is consistent.
What does being biracial have to do with any of this? This is a topic of sex, not race.
Another thing. You just said "What if an MRA killed?" not, "What if an MRA killed women"? I brought up Elliot Rodger because he killed people. A person whose beliefs fell right in line with yours, and he killed people.
And oh really? Elliot Rodger wasn't an MRA?
He was subscribed to several MRA YouTube channels, he regularly posted to MRA forums and said, “Start envisioning a world where WOMEN FEAR YOU.”.
There's more too: nypost.com/2014/05/26/killers-…
So, I just shot your little argument out of the sky there.
And white people are the ones most demonized by the media? Please. Do you have anything to back this up? Literally anything?
What do you think of groups like BLM and the Black Panther Party? To you, they probably sound super racist and anti-white. But if you paid any attention to their rhetoric and their goals, you would understand that is absolutely not the case. But of course, I shouldn't expect you to know that, you're not even competent enough to understand it.
I like how you say I breathe this in like a zombie, but here you are repeating the same tired reactionary bullshit I hear all the fucking time. It's nothing new. Literally everything you've said could just be some copypasta you found off some reactionary bullshit site like Breit fucking bart or some shit like that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If anything you are a liberal, since you're only using news sources that have zero sources that don't lead to anything but more sources. Like, somehow, a link to a youtube channel is a source to prove he was subbed to an MRA? Let alone a deleted channel? Or the fact that none of what you said supports white privilege being a thing?
And he was an MRA? Where did he call himself one? Or did it fly over your head, like the cuckling you are, the he killed 4 men, and still intended to kill men as well? A damaged PUA is not synonymous with MRA.
Point is the black panther party knew when to stop. BLM didn't. You don't have the right to compare them, because even the Black Panther Party has come out with members saying BLM goes too far. To you, the idea that blacks can be racist sounds pretty triggering, considering the conditioning your fat face has with the indoctrination you've been in.
But last I checked, when you fail to differentiate yourself from people screaming for the death of cops, and the most you do is say "I don't support that", but then proceed to defend the people who do, you aren't for equality. YOU WANT ENTITLEMENTS TO BE ON TOP.
The point is you use definitions to excuse the bullshit of the left. And you are wrong. End of story. Definitions are not magic laws that control your intentions. Full stop.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
What I was saying had nothing to do with white privilege as a whole, you dense idiot. If anything, you're a liberal for being as pro-status quo as you are.
The Black Panther Party didn't "know when to stop", you fucking moron. The FBI systematically shut them down.
And the idea of blacks being prejudiced isn't new. Prejudiced blacks definitely exist. They just don't have the power of systemic racism behind them.
Also, ACAB. All Cops Are Bastards. I don't fucking care what you think, I'm saying it now.
"Oh do you even mean black ones?" Yes.
"Do you even mean female ones?" Yes.
"How about the good ones?" Yes.
You clearly don't know history very well. Yeah, a few members of the former Black Panther Party don't approve of BLM, but it's nothing new for once radical leftists to slowly turn into liberals. Angela Davis and Noam Chomsky are guilty of this.
And what about you? You seem to want men at the top and you defend MRA's at every turn. Hell, with your comment of "I bet if an MRA killed someone", you're IMPLYING THAT YOU'D DEFEND THAT MRA.
I find it funny how you try to denigrate me for supposed "wanting cops dead", after having told me to kill myself. Twice. A bit hypocritical, don't you think? Even though you're more likely to be killed by a cop than by a BLM member.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>