HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS

| TheNewClams

TheNewClams [13796258] [2010-05-10 22:30:55 +0000 UTC] "No Way" (United States)

# Statistics

Favourites: 1; Deviations: 8; Watchers: 9

Watching: 0; Pageviews: 3595; Comments Made: 146; Friends: 0


# Comments

Comments: 43

happymengeleplz [2010-06-28 16:51:51 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TheNewClams In reply to happymengeleplz [2010-06-28 17:32:41 +0000 UTC]

...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

K3nel1OS [2010-06-20 16:08:03 +0000 UTC]

And no, I'm not on dA for the praise. XD I'm here cuz I can be.

And my "alternate reality" here on dA is that I get a bunny icon.

Yeah, I mean, I'm sooooooo misguided. PLEASE, GIVE ME YOUR GUIDANCE. WE ALL NEED IT SO BADLY, O MESSIAH OF DA.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TheNewClams In reply to K3nel1OS [2010-06-20 19:27:56 +0000 UTC]

Yet you accuse me of living in an "alternate reality". Do you not see the irony?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

K3nel1OS In reply to TheNewClams [2010-06-20 20:13:54 +0000 UTC]

I see it plenty, darling. XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

K3nel1OS [2010-06-20 16:03:58 +0000 UTC]

We do not need reality. This is dA. XD YOU are living in some weird alternate reality if you think we're going to listen.

We don't need your "reality" because I have it in the real world.

Besides, in no way, shape, or form is Encyclopedia Dramatica reality! XDD Oh geez, listen to yourself there.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

TheNewClams In reply to K3nel1OS [2010-06-20 19:32:12 +0000 UTC]

"Besides, in no way, shape, or form is Encyclopedia Dramatica reality! XDD Oh geez, listen to yourself there."

When have I ever said this? Please stop putting words in my mouth.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

K3nel1OS In reply to TheNewClams [2010-06-20 20:12:55 +0000 UTC]

Hehe.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheNewClams In reply to K3nel1OS [2010-06-20 19:27:03 +0000 UTC]

...Do you realize that you saying "We do not need reality." is the reason ED thinks the way it thinks, and also the reason I think the same way as it?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

K3nel1OS In reply to TheNewClams [2010-06-20 20:13:25 +0000 UTC]

I know what ED thinks about dA, and I never said it wasn't in partial truth. XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TheNewClams In reply to K3nel1OS [2010-06-20 21:40:59 +0000 UTC]

You failed to address my question. Do you not see that you saying "We do not need reality." is precisely why ED has the ideals it shows on it's articles. I didn't ask what ED says in relation to dA or anything about any truth in it's articles on dA or it's users.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

K3nel1OS In reply to TheNewClams [2010-06-20 21:47:06 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I see it. Yet, ED has rather exaggerated what we mean by the phrase, hasn't it?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TheNewClams In reply to K3nel1OS [2010-06-20 22:16:14 +0000 UTC]

What do you mean "exaggerated"? How can one exaggerate "We do not need reality".

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

K3nel1OS In reply to TheNewClams [2010-06-20 22:21:08 +0000 UTC]

One can exaggerate it by going to lengths to describe what we mean by "We do not need reality"; only explaining the worst of us. By "We do not reality", I do not by any means mean that I am rejecting reality. I don't bury myself in anime or praise to escape reality; in fact, I don't do it at all. What I mean is that:

This is an art community, not a drama center or somewhere to talk about the real world. It's art, not a bunch of teenage drama whores. (They ARE there, but they're not the focus, despite what you may think.) It's an art community, I like it, and no one who's going to talk about how we're rejecting reality is going to make me quit. So what I say is this: I am not going to change my views, you are not going to change yours. Let's keep it at that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TheNewClams In reply to K3nel1OS [2010-06-20 22:39:52 +0000 UTC]

You say that dA is an art community, and in the past, that might have been true. However, there are individuals that you may not know about that prompt my statment that dA used to be an art community.

A few are:

EnchantsRequiem, CaptainJamesman, August Yifu, SlyFoxMaren, Branca, and, of course, Chris-chan.

These people and many, many others ARE cancer, and have turned this site into a shadow of it's former self. And they ARE they focus, because if they aren't handled swiftly and allowed to gain credibility, then they become a stain on the site.

There are, simply put, more terrible "artists" than good ones. And I refuse to give them the title of artist because they do not deserve it. To be an artist is something I can not describe, for I have no idea what it means to be one, but I know what isn't one, based on the only person I can relate to, and that is myself.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

K3nel1OS In reply to TheNewClams [2010-06-21 04:58:49 +0000 UTC]

And you know this how? Please, enlighten me about your past dA experience. All your old accounts that you went along your merry chipper way through the land of art.

Well, duh. There are idiots in every crowd. You're marking the whole community simply for the idiots?

And, well, I'm not a good artist by any means. But I still don't think I'm a "cancer".

And no, this site can still be quite a good art community as long as you'd actually, well, be involved instead of just looking in.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

TheNewClams In reply to K3nel1OS [2010-06-21 13:56:32 +0000 UTC]

Not idiots, though a large part is. I am marking them as failures to act on the idiots, that's all.

I didn't say you where.

>implying I'm not involved

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheNewClams In reply to K3nel1OS [2010-06-21 12:44:35 +0000 UTC]

Through ED of course, for it is primarily an archiving site. While this may sound hypocritical, consider the following: How do you know of past events? It is impossible to experience all that go's on in this site alone.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

K3nel1OS In reply to TheNewClams [2010-06-21 18:31:06 +0000 UTC]

I know of dA for quite a time back because I've been on dA myself for about a year (this account only two or three months, though) and I have friends who've had accounts longer. I didn't say I experienced everything that goes on here.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TheNewClams In reply to K3nel1OS [2010-06-21 19:38:30 +0000 UTC]

And I didn't say you said you experienced everything that goes on here.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheNewClams [2010-06-16 18:38:41 +0000 UTC]

Listen up. I am dumping 1000+ pics. I will be dump 100~ every 10 min. I am only human.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TheNewClams In reply to TheNewClams [2010-06-16 20:00:18 +0000 UTC]

Disregard that. No plan, winging it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TheNewClams In reply to TheNewClams [2010-06-16 21:08:38 +0000 UTC]

Disregard that, everyone is a tard.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FaustReygar [2010-06-16 18:17:11 +0000 UTC]

Hello. Do you wanna look my works and add favorites, please? [link] It's no spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JMCalcifer [2010-06-16 17:57:29 +0000 UTC]

hey there! here, have a llama badge.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

VampireInTheSunlight [2010-06-16 17:57:06 +0000 UTC]

Wow, you're so cool an original, hating the site.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

K3nel1OS In reply to VampireInTheSunlight [2010-06-20 16:04:27 +0000 UTC]

Inorite? They're, like, the MESSIAH of dA. They even like ED.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

VampireInTheSunlight In reply to K3nel1OS [2010-06-20 20:03:10 +0000 UTC]

OMG YEAH

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

happymengeleplz [2010-06-15 16:09:59 +0000 UTC]

HIAHIAHIAHIAHAIHAIHAIHAIHAA!!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

arsdraconis [2010-06-13 00:43:40 +0000 UTC]

you know what 4chan hates more than furries? People who break rules 1&2!!!!

nah, I'm just joshing you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PolandballRocks [2010-06-11 01:39:37 +0000 UTC]

bro what chan you ? 4 , 8 , 7 \int/ or Harvard(or did they change the name again ?).

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TheNewClams In reply to PolandballRocks [2010-06-11 01:46:51 +0000 UTC]

If you must know, 4Chan. Happy?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PolandballRocks In reply to TheNewClams [2010-06-11 01:48:01 +0000 UTC]

yea was going for Harvard though....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

K3nel1OS [2010-06-11 01:38:27 +0000 UTC]

Butthurt EDidiot is still butthurt.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TheNewClams In reply to K3nel1OS [2010-06-11 01:46:16 +0000 UTC]

>implying I edit ED

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheNewClams [2010-06-10 23:08:31 +0000 UTC]

...It's worse than ED says. The way they talk... speaking in tongues is more civil than this.
Anyway, when did I ever say I was an artist, or, in your case, an "artist"? I didn't you had to be either an artist or an "artist" to have a DA page.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Smileygal3 [2010-06-10 23:03:40 +0000 UTC]

You seem no different than the people I meet on here. Just thought you should know. ^__^
And you claim you're not an artist, but you have art on your page. >___> -had to point that out-

And you hide comments that own you, too. xD -amused by this-

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheNewClams [2010-06-10 20:58:33 +0000 UTC]

V------ Butthurt tards are butthurt even moar

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheNewClams [2010-06-10 20:56:54 +0000 UTC]

No u

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

harmony-world [2010-06-10 20:52:38 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Morkos [2010-05-30 12:49:59 +0000 UTC]

You got some too? I tried to reason with her and even tried to link her to a Catholic site. She hasn't responded, though.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

5jal-AL5eal [2010-05-27 15:08:06 +0000 UTC]

[link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Walter-kovacs-II In reply to 5jal-AL5eal [2010-06-01 00:49:25 +0000 UTC]

You, madam, are just as prejudiced against Christianity as you say these people are against Islam. That video you linked this deviant to shows it. Tell me, where are the churches and synagogues in Mecca? Do you know that one of the biggest mosques in Europe is next door to the Vatican? Why aren’t Christians allowed to practice their religion in your country? Your hypocrisy makes me want to vomit!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

5jal-AL5eal [2010-05-27 15:05:17 +0000 UTC]

This is a response to all who hates Islam

[link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0