TombojinUkiyo In reply to davehare [2008-09-30 02:16:57 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, and you're welcome. I enjoyed how you took obviously sexual situations and elevated them beyond just erotica to a captured sensual experience. Many of your images caught that single moment in time when that spark, that tingle of intense pleasure originates in the woman's sexual center, travels up her spine into her mind, and washes over her body in pure delight, accompanied only by a sigh, a moan, some verbal release.

While it could be argued that your works are simply voyeuristic, exploitative even, I would counter that anyone who has pleased a woman in such a way, to such extremes is in themselves being voyeuristic. A large part of the "pleaser's" own delight comes from witnessing the "pleasured" be delighted herself. For me, with the larger body of your work, it was that sense memory your art triggered, a reminder of shared experiences.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

davehare In reply to TombojinUkiyo [2008-09-30 10:32:26 +0000 UTC]

That sounds just about right. I'm not as literate as you, that's why I take pictures.
It is a fine line between erotica and porn/voyeurism. The shot, pose, light and look has to be right. My main pleasure is that my models are enjoying and "into" the shoot, they are as keen for it to work as I am. If they weren't - it wouldn't.
I have been very lucky with my models, for several their shoot with me was their first venture into nude/erotica, and some have then gone from strength to strength in this genre. So all in all I think we did fairly well.
Take care.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0