WaterBender31 In reply to ArrogantVengeance [2010-10-02 15:24:06 +0000 UTC]

Hey! Nothing much. Just school and what not. How's...college? I have met people who liked the movie before they saw it, and then trashed it in every way possible after they saw it, but no boycotters. haha.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArrogantVengeance In reply to WaterBender31 [2010-10-02 18:28:32 +0000 UTC]

It's good, but hard. The people there are way better than high school people, more mature. And I like it like that, high school was the worst school years of my life.

Really? Have we both encountered some of these people before? Are they from the LAF forums? Everything seems to be quieter in the Avatar fandom now, though there are still people making dumb pics ridiculing the movie.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WaterBender31 In reply to ArrogantVengeance [2010-10-07 19:29:28 +0000 UTC]

Ohh, Well, I digress from that statement. haha I actually think High school is great. Well, other than sophomore year. I had my money stolen that year, but I have finally learned to forget and move on. haha.

Yupp, on LAF. some guy names moosysomething. his sig is Aang and it says "4 days". but he is bashing every aspect of the movie now. it's really annoying.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArrogantVengeance In reply to WaterBender31 [2010-10-07 20:35:47 +0000 UTC]

Well I guess to each their own, high school experience is different for everyone

Ah I see, I've also seen some people on the LAF boards spam and state how bad the movie was. But I see people always telling them to leave if they dont like the movie

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WaterBender31 In reply to juju2479 [2010-08-03 14:25:52 +0000 UTC]

Hey heyy heyy!! Yeahh. AWESOME!!! Katara really is the BEST. The film was...not what I expected, but I enjoyed it. There were some parts of the movie that were flat out bad, but it also had it's moments. When it comes out in UK, you should definitely go see it! Oh, I love crazy Azula! but yes, it is very sad for her.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

juju2479 In reply to WaterBender31 [2010-08-03 20:25:10 +0000 UTC]

i heard the film will not be too good, but yeah i am gonna go see it on first day! and the scenes with crazy azula and her mother made me shiver...it was done so well!! almost a tear haha when she got crazy she parred with azula on my character levels!! apparantly she was only 14!! didnt know that XD and nick says she is currently at a mental hospital!! WOWZERS!! You heard of the legend of korra~i almost cried the old cast is old or dead~i was seriously depressed~now thinking katara is old or dead cant wait to see it.....i hope that aang used his spiritual powers in a big battle to save most of the original cast (like aang in the iceberg) and korra finds them and frees them ~THAT WOULD BE SO COOL!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WaterBender31 In reply to juju2479 [2010-08-03 22:52:29 +0000 UTC]

I knoww! Ohh, Legend of Korra? Yes, I have! But here is some depressing news. All of the characters from Avatar: The Last Airbender are all dead. According to someone who is working with the voice recordings, she said that the old characters have died and a new generation is born...Oh well, I think this series will be AWESOME!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

juju2479 In reply to WaterBender31 [2010-08-04 11:55:05 +0000 UTC]

yeah i just saw on the fan site but i am so excited about it still!! even though the caster has said that~i still think they are gonna sneak an old cast member in as a surprise!!! i wont get my hopes too high though...OMG just now i typed in azula and katara on deviantart (it was so hot!! them kissing half naked!! haha)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WaterBender31 In reply to juju2479 [2010-08-04 17:14:15 +0000 UTC]

Hahaha yeahh, I'm just going to wait and see. Bahaha!! yeah, extremely. haha!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WaterBender31 In reply to TheToonDevil [2010-07-17 03:29:05 +0000 UTC]

Yes I did! The day it came out actually. It was...well, it all depends on your point of view. I enjoyed myself watching it, but many people would say this movie was horrible. It just depends on the viewer. Now, I don't want to tell you that it was awesome, you should definitely go see it, because if you see it and hate it, it would basically be all my fault. Hahaha! But in my opinion, I think it's worth seeing. I really hope they meet the expectations financially to make a second and third movie. If you want to know the downsides of what I thought the movie had, well, the biggest one is that there was no character development. The most character development was in the fire nation. Also, the fire nation had more acting talent, only because most of the main roles of the fire nation had experience in front of a camera, as opposed to Noah Ringer and Nicola Peltz(Aang and Katara). Sorry for the extremely long reply.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheToonDevil In reply to WaterBender31 [2010-07-17 03:33:22 +0000 UTC]

Oh no worries. Just a few more questions. Did the movie feel at all rushed to tell the story? As I know, the movie was based off the first season of the show. And I just thought stuffing all that would make the film feel rushed and undeveloped.
And from the trailers, the special effects seemed a bit boring. Was there really good effects in the film?

And I loved the story to the show. Were the story plots as good as the shows as well?

No need to reply so quickly. I don't expect you to answer right away. X3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WaterBender31 In reply to TheToonDevil [2010-07-17 03:55:28 +0000 UTC]

Haha, yes. At some times, the story did feel rushed. It is pretty hard to stuff 600 minutes into a 90-minute movie. Very hard. The special effects were amazing. I have to say though, there was one part where the fire moved really slow and it gave the opponent enough time to dodge it but instead, they just stood there like it was coming really fast. But other than that, they were actually pretty decent.

The story was the same as the series, just cut down a lot and it wasn't as detailed. But overall, the whole plot was there.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheToonDevil In reply to WaterBender31 [2010-07-17 04:13:18 +0000 UTC]

Well I'll still have to check it out. It won't cost me much since my brother works at a movie theater. I just have to pay for snacks. XD

I was thinking of what movie to watch, and thought Avatar would be interesting. It looks alot better then most cartoon/anime/game based movies. So I thought I'd watch it. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WaterBender31 In reply to TheToonDevil [2010-07-17 14:19:33 +0000 UTC]

That's good! It is a pretty adaption. Unlike Dragonball: Evolution. That was probably the most terrible adaption.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheToonDevil In reply to WaterBender31 [2010-07-18 03:16:09 +0000 UTC]

Oi, Dragonball had nothing to do with the original. XP

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WaterBender31 In reply to TheToonDevil [2010-07-18 05:12:13 +0000 UTC]

Seriously. There was no plot either. it was just everywhere. hahaha!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheToonDevil In reply to WaterBender31 [2010-07-18 05:13:10 +0000 UTC]

I hated how Piccolo came out. He was my most favorite character in DBZ!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WaterBender31 In reply to alphawolfnami [2010-06-25 22:19:14 +0000 UTC]

I'll do my best to help you, but I don't think she'll change her mind. But yes, I'll try, ok?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArrogantVengeance In reply to WaterBender31 [2010-06-27 03:13:01 +0000 UTC]

Actually, what I said about her in my journal entry is all true about her, and now she's saying to you that it isn't because she's a liar and she doesn't want me exposing her for how she really is and what she really did. In other words, she's a coward. You know by now I wouldn't have done the journal entry about her unless I'm provoked, ehich I was, because she accused me of a serious offence that I have not done.

And first off, tell her my entry was NOT a call for assistance from my friends, so please tell her that. I don't actually tell them straight out to comment on her page for me, I just stated what problems I've been having with her, that's all. She is just misreading my entry as a 'personal attack' on her, when actually, she made a personal attack on me in the first place. And (out of topic but...) on top of that, she called chomoco "a disgrace for being Korean and defending the movie".

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WaterBender31 In reply to ArrogantVengeance [2010-06-27 03:21:50 +0000 UTC]

Don't worry. I will. I knew there was something fishy about her. Ever since she knew I was your friend she acted as if she had nothing to do with any of it...what a devious little.....gahh. I knew it. she's just like everyone else.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArrogantVengeance In reply to WaterBender31 [2010-06-27 03:35:34 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. mmhmm, just like every other boycotter in other words, only worse. She's beyond the level of insanity unlike typical ones, she's plain psychotic. You think even if we didn't tell her that we were friends that she would actually do anything about Emma's deviations anyways? I doubt it... At least now we won't have any problems with dA that has to do with deviations. I say we should just block her and her other accounts and just ignore her from now on.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WaterBender31 In reply to alphawolfnami [2010-06-24 03:45:36 +0000 UTC]

Haha, ok then. Good night! And I hope you're trip to Washington is fun!

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

alphawolfnami In reply to WaterBender31 [2010-06-24 04:04:02 +0000 UTC]

Otherwise they would have to go to your page to see that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

alphawolfnami In reply to WaterBender31 [2010-06-24 04:03:47 +0000 UTC]

I mean, as a reply on my comment on my page. So that people can see that we have a mutual understanding.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WaterBender31 In reply to alphawolfnami [2010-06-23 23:50:51 +0000 UTC]

Well, ok then. If it's illegal, how come I haven't been notified from ANY dA members yet? And don't give me that, "Well you should have known in the first place..." I didn't know, because I saw so many people posting non-original pictures, so I thought it was fine. dA would have suspected something, because all the deviations go through them too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

alphawolfnami In reply to WaterBender31 [2010-06-24 00:01:44 +0000 UTC]

And I'm terribly sorry if I come off harsh, but you called me a "****@ss" when I have not made a single insulting, provoking, name calling attack that was not civil.

I don't think it is ever justified to use or condone such abusive language.

It strips the user of dignity, respect, and honor. I also lose respect of the user in realizing that the user does not respect me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WaterBender31 In reply to alphawolfnami [2010-06-24 00:10:26 +0000 UTC]

Wow, so you're just going to ignore the fact that the ones you support are using more abusive language than myself?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alphawolfnami In reply to WaterBender31 [2010-06-24 00:17:08 +0000 UTC]

You're being prejudice by assuming that all racebenders act provokingly.

If I were like you, I would've stated that all procasters curse and yell using caps locks.

However, I am not that prejudice or gullible. I do not believe that because I can accept that one person does not represent a whole, faction, population.

I accept that there are emotional racebenders, just as there are emotional procasters like yourself.

However, I must insist that your statement is completely false for I only specifically support those who can withstand a conversation without ranting, cursing, or using profanities. If you wish to deny that, then please show me a person I am subscribed to or following that curses and calls people "smartass[es]".

Please do. Because I believe that there is resect and dignity in the world. I only support and follow those that are intelligent and dignified in their answers in respecting others.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WaterBender31 In reply to alphawolfnami [2010-06-24 00:29:06 +0000 UTC]

Wow, I didn't say all were saying that. I said "many", not "all". Would you like proof for that also? [link] And I don't see how it's prejudice. If I'm prejudice because I said that many racebenders have called us names, then that means some racebenders/boycotters are prejudice too.

Again, re-read, because I didn't say all.

I don't see how I am an emotional procaster. I would have been using exclamation marks and all caps if I really were. I would have made deviations against racebending and saying how they're wrong in every way possible, but I didn't. So, I really don't see how I am an "emotional procaster".

You follow racebending.com and the protest to boycott the movie, and within that lives many less civil, non-rational people.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alphawolfnami In reply to WaterBender31 [2010-06-24 00:41:05 +0000 UTC]

Many is still prejudice. If you met short African Americans and thought, "Hey, he's short. Then many African Americans must be short." However, that kind of thinking is prejudice. Please direct your attention to dictionary.com so that I don't have to spell it out for you like I've done for several other words. Many-All? That's just splitting hairs. Seriously? If you want to nit pick at my words, my statements, then I will do the same.

"...means some racebenders/boycotters are prejudice too."
Some and many are not the same. You are now correcting yourself to seem true. You state that many are this and that, but now you state that some are this and that.

That was nit-picking, just for your information.

You don't see how you are an emotional procaster? You have demeaned me and stated how I was "busted" and that I was a "smartass." If that is not an emotional term used only in haste of anger, then I don't know what an emotional reaction is. Oh wait, yes I do. Psychology classes taught me that emotional procaster immediately use aggressive tones and tries to provoke others with curse words. Hm. I wonder where I've seen that before?

Just to use your way of thinking so that you understand..

I would have made deviations against racebending and saying how they're wrong in every way possible, but I didn't.
Would be the "extremely serious" case of an emotional procaster. Whether "extremely serious" or not, you are an emotional procaster as well as I am. Just accept it with dignity. It just happens that I am not that visibly emotional because I do not curse nor call others belittling names.

"You follow racebending.com and the protest to boycott the movie, and within that lives many less civil, non-rational people."

That is once more an example of prejudice because you assume that every racebender is a "less civil, non-rational people."

Am I less civil than you? For not using curse words when you so readily did? Am I less civil than you? For following the rules that we had to accept once entering Deviantart? When you have not even read the rules?

No. I am a racebender. No more, no less civil than you, doubtless of the fact that you have cursed and called me names.

You just don't want to accept that and continue to isolate a group of believers as "racebender" that are "less civil."

That is the definition of prejudice.

prej·u·dice   /ˈprɛdʒədɪs/ Show Spelled [prej-uh-dis] Show IPA noun, verb, -diced, -dic·ing.
–noun
1. unreasonable feelings, opinions, or attitudes, esp. of a hostile nature, regarding a racial, religious, or national group.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WaterBender31 In reply to alphawolfnami [2010-06-24 01:03:51 +0000 UTC]

Oh my gosh. Are you freaking serious? You're telling me that I said, "oh, one person is calling me names, therefore many of them do." No, I said many racebenders have called me names for being a procaster. I didn't just say one. And I didn't say all.

What ever, it was a illiterate error. What if I had said "many" then? You'd still find some way to contradict me.

That's really not being an emotional procaster. That's stating the obvious. The "smartass" I can understand, but it is true. And how do you know if I'm angry just from me saying one name calling word and saying "busted"?


"I would have made deviations against racebending and saying how they're wrong in every way possible, but I didn't.
Would be the "extremely serious" case of an emotional procaster. Whether "extremely serious" or not, you are an emotional procaster as well as I am. Just accept it with dignity. It just happens that I am not that visibly emotional because I do not curse nor call others belittling names."

I don't get how that proves me being emotional, because I didn't post deviations of hate towards racebenders. I didn't say I wasn't an emotional procaster. I just said how does your accusations make me an emotional procaster? I never denied that I was, because I know I am.

Again, I didn't say "every". You really are putting words in my mouth.

What the heck!? I didn't say you were less civil than me. You didn't care to acknowledge the fact that many racebenders/boycotters are calling us procasters names.

I only called you ONE name. you said, "doubtless of the fact that you have cursed and called me names." And I only cursed once, which was the word, "hell" which was not towards you. It was just me, letting off steam.

Did I say I needed the definition? No, so you just wasted your time giving me information that I didn't ask for. Also, I didn't give an incorrect definition, so that really wasn't necessary.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

ArrogantVengeance In reply to WaterBender31 [2010-06-24 15:39:46 +0000 UTC]

Wow, so all of the sudden being an 'emotional' procaster is annoying but an emotional boycotter is not? Wow, seriously, alpha shouldn't be talking, because first off, the boycotting wouldn't be happening if it weren't for overly emotional and sensitive boycotters complaining and bitching about the 'skin colors and ethnicities' of the actors in the cast. Boycotters are the only overly emotional people in this argument, not us procasters. We are actually trying to talk some logic into these people, because many times, emotion is pretty illogical, especially when someone is so overly sensitive about a movie, A MOVIE. A movie based on a fictional world which is INFLUENCED (not exact) by Asian cultures.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

alphawolfnami In reply to WaterBender31 [2010-06-24 01:28:29 +0000 UTC]

"You're telling me that I said, "oh, one person is calling me names, therefore many of them do.""

That is incorrect. I have never said one. If I had, please provide evidence, for I have never made such a statement. Please do not put words in my mouth.

"No, I said many racebenders have called me names for being a procaster. I didn't just say one. And I didn't say all."

Yet you so readily state many, then some in a comment. I am just calling you out on a change you are making. By definition, many is a majority, some is a minority. By definition, you are trying to change your words to seem justified.

If you tell me I am nit-picking, then please explain to me why you originally have done the same to me. I only play the games that you set. If you want to get mean, I'll get mean. (Reluctantly though. I really won't get mean.)

"That's really not being an emotional procaster. That's stating the obvious. The "smartass" I can understand, but it is true. And how do you know if I'm angry just from me saying one name calling word and saying "busted"?"

The entire statement you have made was in an aggressive, accusing tone. I will provide you with evidence since you will not see through my eyes.

"What the hell are you trying to say?" That is not the same as me saying, "Can you please clarify?"

I have accounted for over 14 word that have been all capitalized to emphasize the word. Granted, I have only used two capitalized words, but that was to show you the policies of DA. Your words were to demean my points.

"Don't even tell me you need proof for that." When I have stated instead, "Would you like me to elaborate, explain?"

"You really need to get your facts straight." Instead, I have said, please research more.

"...doing to everyone else, but she also hid that comment." Funny I have never hidden any comments of mine. I believe I have nothing to hide. Your 'friend' apparently had something to hide. Including her own comments.

"You should READ better. Maybe re-reading would be a smart idea. That would be a first for you." If you need some analysis on why this is offensive and demeaning, then I will provide you with a full on essay. I have a psychology book ready on hand.

"How the heck did we go.." One more use of a curse word. If you do not believe it is a curse word, then you must agree that it is an emotional word used in anger.

" don't see how I am an emotional procaster. I would have been using exclamation marks and all caps if I really were. I would have made deviations against racebending and saying how they're wrong in every way possible, but I didn't. So, I really don't see how I am an "emotional procaster". "

You have stated that you didn't know how you were an emotional procaster. I replied with the reasons why you were. I also would like to point out that you have stated that you have never used all caps when you repeated have. Especially in your response.

"What the heck!? I didn't say you were less civil than me. You didn't care to acknowledge the fact that many racebenders/boycotters are calling us procasters names."

I would like to advise you to reread my comments. I have already stated..

"Because everyone can be as mean as they want to be, not I chose not to be. Don't try to change the subject by blaming it on other racebenders/boycotters. You said it. No other procaster cursed at me. You did. Not someone else. Don't try to divert the blame. Shoulder the responsibility you bore upon your shoulders by daring to curse at someone else. That is your responsibility alone, not other racebender or procasters alike."

Notice that I used the word, "everybody" and "racebender or procaster alike." and I have acknowledged that fact had you read some of my comments to your 'friend.' I have sincerely stated that both procasters and racebenders are emotional. That is also obviously evident through my past comments. Which I must repeatedly copy and paste for you to see.

"I only called you ONE name. you said, "doubtless of the fact that you have cursed and called me names." And I only cursed once, which was the word, "hell" which was not towards you. It was just me, letting off steam."

That is nit-picking. I nit-pick too. I did before to show you. But you continue to nit-pick at a single letter. Names-Name. Really?

Thank you for atleast acknowledging that your cursing was in haste. Atleast I can say that I am an emotional person and save face.

You have told me I was wrong because I said banned instead of blocked. They are the same. They are listed as synonymous words in the thesaurus. If you really want to question that, then please contact the webmaster and publisher of dictionary.com. Thereby, your statement is incorrect. They are synonymous. You had no right to comment on your opinions without correctly knowing the situation. That is jumping without looking.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WaterBender31 In reply to alphawolfnami [2010-06-24 01:43:31 +0000 UTC]

Well, I'm not going to bother and keep repeating myself over and over, so I'm just going to hit the key points.

When I was talking about being an emotional procaster, and I said I would have used all caps, I meant all caps as in this: THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF ALL CAPS. What I was doing, was emphasizing the word, just like you said yourself. It's not offensive, it was a more efficient and more simple way other than using the italics ordeal. Again, I was just letting off steam, which explains my non-rational statements, and for that, I apologize for my misbehavior. It's just hard to get a point through when the opponent of the discussion doesn't understand, even though it was clearly stated.

I never said you nit-picked. End of that.

I didn't say they were different words. I just said it depends on the context of the sentence. The way you put it, it sounded like you meant banned from dA.

Again, I'm not looking for anymore arguing, so I'm ending it here.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alphawolfnami In reply to WaterBender31 [2010-06-24 01:50:48 +0000 UTC]

It is not efficient and more simple. Had it been, then it would legalized for english criticism and essays. Just to point it out. What is acceptable online is not acceptable in the real world.

" The way you put it, it sounded like you meant banned from dA."

Once again, if you had actually did some research and talked with your 'friend' then you wouldn't haven't even had this arguement. Instead of starting an arguement with what you know from "like you meant," start with some concrete evidence and facts.

It saves me the time and effort.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WaterBender31 In reply to alphawolfnami [2010-06-24 01:54:15 +0000 UTC]

I never said it should be allowed for english criticism and essays, I just said it was a more efficient and simple way than using italics. And I apologized for most, if not all the harsh comments I have said, so I don't get why you're still not accepting them.

Once again, it was just the way you put it. if I asked my friend, she would have told me to go straight to the comments saection because at first, she didn't quite understand because she didn't know who you were at first.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alphawolfnami In reply to WaterBender31 [2010-06-24 02:16:44 +0000 UTC]

"I never said it should be allowed for english criticism and essays,"

Nor have I made a statement saying you should allow it for english criticism and essays. You are making hollow accusations. You are stating that you never did this and that, when I never made that statement in the first place. If I had, please provide me with evidence. I know when I am right or wrong, and I can admit if I am wrong. However, I have not made that statement that you believe it should be allowed for english criticisms and essays, thereby justifying my reason.

"so I don't get why you're still not accepting them."
Could you clarify what them are? If they are the comments, I have diligently read each word and sentence. I accept the comments in terms of reading them instead of ignoring them. However, if that is not the sense of accepting them, if you want me to accept and adopt your beliefs, I will not. I will not see the movie.

Please note that I am not accusing you of asking me to accept and adopt your beliefs. It is just an "if factor" in case that you were. If you were, then I will not conform.

" if I asked my friend, she would have told me to go straight to the comments saection because at first, she didn't quite understand because she didn't know who you were at first."

Well, then that is of her fault. I have openly stated that I was the other user. If she does not understand what I ment by that, then I do not know what to do. If you want the copy of my statement that I gave to her, saying that I was the second user, then I will give you it.

That is not my fault. I said it. Clean, cut, concise. I was the second user. Please do not blame me for stating something as obvious as that. Please ask her why she "didn't quite understand because she didn't know who you were at first" when I had said, "I am the other user that commented on your profile."

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WaterBender31 In reply to alphawolfnami [2010-06-24 02:21:30 +0000 UTC]

"I never said it should be allowed for english criticism and essays,"

I said that because you started to talk about english criticisms and essays, even though I didn't bring that up. So, it's whatever now.

I said, "I already apologized for my mishaps, so I don't get why you're still not accepting them." My apologies is what "them" is.

" if I asked my friend, she would have told me to go straight to the comments saection because at first, she didn't quite understand because she didn't know who you were at first."

I forgot to include that my friend told me that before you replied with the revealing statement of you're other account.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alphawolfnami In reply to WaterBender31 [2010-06-24 02:43:36 +0000 UTC]

I have already acknowledged them as you have done mine. I have said so in several comments. If you would like me to reread my own comments to find them, then I will do so kindly.

That would have been nice of you to include that. Otherwise we wouldn't be having this misunderstanding arguement.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WaterBender31 In reply to alphawolfnami [2010-06-24 02:49:27 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I know. I got way over my head and completely forgot that one crucial detail, which could have resulted in a more accepting way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alphawolfnami In reply to WaterBender31 [2010-06-24 02:56:10 +0000 UTC]

Well that crucial detail caused 12 hours of mindless arguement because people keep saying, "This is my rebuttal and I'm done arguing so you can't argue back."

(Just for your information, that is not specifically you. When I ment people, it did not mean you. People =/= you.)

Honor and dignity is a crucial detail in of itself. Avatar taught its watchers that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WaterBender31 In reply to alphawolfnami [2010-06-24 02:58:28 +0000 UTC]

12 hours? Has it really been that long? Or are you just using it figuratively?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alphawolfnami In reply to WaterBender31 [2010-06-24 03:04:11 +0000 UTC]

If you check from the original parent comment, the first comment you made on my profile, it says that it was 12 hours ago. I actually do not know the exact minute and second you posted the comment, but it says on my computer screen that the original comment was posted 12 hours ago.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1