fumidraws In reply to Katven7 [2016-07-29 23:29:08 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!! :0

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fumidraws In reply to ValenciaPrimrose [2016-07-20 19:25:40 +0000 UTC]

Thank you :0 and no problem!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fumidraws In reply to Rockdwarf [2016-07-09 19:53:55 +0000 UTC]

No problem!  And thank you so much!      

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rockdwarf In reply to fumidraws [2016-07-09 20:57:28 +0000 UTC]

i feel flattered u faved precisely this picture from me since it's my oldest wholy finished pic I've posted and it means a lot to me, since it was drawn for two years, it represents most of my very èrsonal likes and issues but it was finished alones looking at late night tv, the film was Snatch from Guy Ritchie which I never had seen before but I already love. And u know... For a first impression, the drawing really looks like it could belong to the film after so much changes, changes that somehow speak of me a bit, but also the picture doesn't exist anymore since I just plainly erased most of it and kept the changes going on, so having u fave it, to me, it's like a window to the àst.

Also a good signal on your stylism, means you're quite stylish to select one of my best works from my gallery, even to my eyes, since most of them are rad sketches unfinished and or difficult to see trough a computer. Fantastic choice!

And sorry for all the long lines u.I

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fumidraws In reply to Rockdwarf [2016-07-10 01:45:43 +0000 UTC]

I'm sorry that the drawing that means so much to you is erased. However, I'm glad that you haven't forgotten it and that I got a chance to actually see it. I faved this picture because of it's line work, shading, and presence. Not only that but it was strange and I like strange interesting things. I didn't quite understand it at first but I felt as though it was important. I'm not sure if that says I'm "stylish" lol but I do like things that capture my attention for more than 2 seconds. Also, don't worry about the lines I write a lot too. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rockdwarf In reply to fumidraws [2016-07-10 02:22:44 +0000 UTC]

Nope, it's not something that makes me sorry, u know they always talk of change and my drawing was fit to change. Anyways it makes me melancholic to look at the changing nature of my own relaity, just happily nostalgic. Like remembering a nice fun with friends that are somehow gone.

Being able to have your sight captured more than 2 secs for something that interests you is indeed more stylish than what many, most, people does. Aww that's fantastic that it doesn't bother you, lol, makes me feel you're cute to express it so nicely.

About lineart.. The fact is most actual painters are digital painters as they plainly delegate the work on pre-stablished methods that make it easier, but as well can destroy it's originality. Our daily life in the Illuminati times, but however, people who could had done very intense stuff in the XX century actualy can't fully show their potential because they're scared and lazy, so lazy. They are, in lil words, WEAK.

In our weaks world of sheeps, real art is dying, it's dead, I mean. Ddead for decades and forever, as well as our race will die in few centuries, and take it for granted. So I feel quite .. ? to hear that I make good lineart. Because most digital artists just PAINT. They reverence form, and not countenance. The details make the real deal, not just the first impression. That's why their weak souls simply excell at lazyly accomplishing to fulfill forms, never to gifve fully rendered souls to their creations. I abhorre that and I abhorre to repeat models, as my life is plainly and fully mine, and no one else's. Since that, I simply take what I see and translate it to a fully rendered cultural form called art, but it's quite easy for me actualy. This drawing was important because it changed with my oddest times and worst memories, recent memories that have rendered the art itself into a completion of my own mind's thoughts.


At first this was a kitty nurse belly sitting on a TV in a Blame!-like universe, a TV powered by a damned man brainwaves. 
Later it aquired a more mundane impression, yet the showman still got his real face uncovered, half corpse half human. From then it became a daily life image, a TV with a FOX-like anglosaxon bullshitter shouting on it and life going on arund that.
I added Phillip Seymour Hoffman sicne I dreamt with him and dressed him the same way he dressed in my dream. Lter when I finaly was able to finish it the drawing took a Guy Ritchieske turn as I finished it looking at snatch. In the time u saw it it got a wholebackground story.
During the recession, the mafia that traffic with stolen organs from compulsory post-mortem donations got a whole bussyness, a very lucrative one, and the chars being represented (as well as being a Gumball's parody), are administration workers and interines who traffic with the organs they steal from their daily job, constisting of inspecting post-mortem mandatory organs donations. 
The conept seems very impressive to me so I'd rather explain it better. 
After dying, all citizens have the obligation to donate their suitable organs, which are later administarted by private organ banks controlling sanitary services. The gov administration has employees that act as inpectors to ensure the payments are all done as expected. The dead ones first are autopsied, and then techs evaluate the needs and tithes and therefore if the deceased can suit the requirements (no dammaged organs, etc), they elaborate a list and send the extirped organs to hospitals that later sell tjem to the private enterprises they belong to. 
The inspectors have the duty to ensure those daily transfussions exist and no organs are lost over time, or that, for exemple, relatives do not find a way to corrupt morgue workers and have the deceased ones be bried with everything untouched.
Since our crisis the functionaries working as inspectors for rogan donations have a good oportunity to sell some of those, hence mafias exist from long ago. The black market relating to this donations is extense, and the ones in the pic work as such. That's the reason of the nurse uniform.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fumidraws In reply to Rockdwarf [2016-07-10 02:53:38 +0000 UTC]

It's great that you can accept your art as your art style and mind continues to develop and change. I also accept that you take pride in the fact that you are able to draw images with in depth meanings that you perceive to be "real" or true art. However, I wouldn't go about denouncing digital art. It's true that most artists of today are digital artists; and yes this means that many people aren't practicing the classical way of drawing and painting like Da Vinci or Michaelangelo. However, I wouldn't say necessarily that this produces a similarity in the artwork that others produce or that it makes their works any less important. Just as you found comfort, expression, and solace in your piece (with it's complexity and all) that does not mean that other artists do not find the same pleasure in the work they create regardless of medium.

Real art, in and of itself, to me at least, is the ability to create something that speaks volumes to you despite what others may think or perceive. As a result, the work may be as beautiful as the works of the greats. It may be ugly, dark, and dreary as well. It may also have a meaning that you yourself may find interesting yet others do not yet it is still art. The fact that many can still resonate with artwork drawn by a single person is beyond me. 

You are a conceptual artist. You find the beauty in looking beyond a color or an object. Instead you look for a meaning in the drawing. In your piece, you saw the objects in a dream and found connections in real life that helped you establish a meaning to what you saw and felt. 

I wouldn't call myself a conceptual artist. Instead, I look for the feeling of a piece. Whether it is dreary, or beautiful, simple, or strange like your drawing I faved. In other words, despite the medium, I find something I love about the piece. I wouldn't say that your image is "real" art. Instead, I would say it's an accurate expression of how you felt, what you saw, and how you displayed that on a piece of paper. Just because it is done in traditional means, that it came from your hand, and your head does not mean that it is what art should be. If we start putting those limits on what "real" art should be, no one would be able to freely and truly express themselves. 

Overall, digital artists, are not weak because they choose a different medium. They are not weak because they choose a computer over a paint brush. Nor does digital art stunt your ability to grow as an individual or unique artist. Instead, it's just a different way that people choose to express themselves. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fumidraws In reply to mel2003 [2016-07-07 03:26:39 +0000 UTC]

No prob you deserve it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fumidraws In reply to SoyRab [2016-07-05 22:08:17 +0000 UTC]

AHHHH thanks so much!!        

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SoyRab In reply to fumidraws [2016-07-07 14:57:55 +0000 UTC]

no problem!
i can;t wait to see what you think of next!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0