HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS

| magiccat137

magiccat137 ♀️ [466221] [2003-07-29 14:56:27 +0000 UTC] "dress in drag & do the hula" (United States)

# Statistics

Favourites: 757; Deviations: 0; Watchers: 61

Watching: 3; Pageviews: 13467; Comments Made: 912; Friends: 3

# About me

Skin of choice: MINE AND I DON'T NEED TO SEE ANYONE ELSE'S!

# Comments

Comments: 397

Fury-Chief [2010-05-30 01:14:27 +0000 UTC]

Hello?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Petraea In reply to Fury-Chief [2010-05-31 08:01:29 +0000 UTC]

Hello. C: *is magiccat137's new account*

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

artisticman101 [2008-07-16 10:00:44 +0000 UTC]

love the show INUYASHA
we need to talk somtime

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Back2Pre-K [2006-02-16 23:56:05 +0000 UTC]

OMFG IF YOU LIKE THE SHOW INUYASHA THAN YOU CAN BE PROMOTED IN MY CHATROOM CALLED #Sesshy COME THERE SOME TIMES IF I AM ONLINE....THANX


-SESSHE'


ME SESSHOUMARU

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

euphoria [2005-06-30 14:28:00 +0000 UTC]

The aggressive commenting on this userpage must stop immediately.

If there is a concern about copyright infringement, please use the button underneath the deviation to report it to the administration; and provide supporting evidence. If there is harrassment or disruptive behavior occurring elsewhere, then please file a report with the Help Desk, include links to the harrassing comments, and it will be investigated promptly.

deviantART does not tolerate any type of harrassment or personal attacks. If this type of activity does not cease, all people involved in the violations will be facing administrative action, up to and including a ban on their account.

Thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

masterdream [2005-06-29 00:47:35 +0000 UTC]

ehm just like this

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

moomoocowsly [2005-06-27 16:49:46 +0000 UTC]

Troublemaker...?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Womped [2005-06-27 12:09:43 +0000 UTC]

I feel sorry for you .

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PolarBear-Papa [2005-06-27 05:22:36 +0000 UTC]

Hey, whatever you do don't flag yourself Canadian. Here women are allowed to go topless anywhere they like. You'd just, like, DIE.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

shmerbal [2005-06-27 03:32:20 +0000 UTC]

"I don't find nudism to be artistic, and the only naked body I want to ever see is my own and my wife's." So you dont want to see naked bodies, but your desktop portrays naked bodies and you have art submitted of naked women? Sure they may not be REAL people, and one may not be human but its still a naked body. And im assuming they arent your wifes. No one said magiccat had to look at anything that she didnt like. Deviant Art is a website for people to submit their art in all forms. thats why people use it. If she doesnt like a style then she doesnt have to look at it. Even if it is a DD. Ignore, refresh the page. but dont go deffending someones opinons about not wanting to see nuddity when you have nudity in your one gallery.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

nimrangul [2005-06-27 01:57:27 +0000 UTC]

Seriously, you need the perverbial ass-kicking of a lifetime for that nonsense on the forums. Anyone with an ounce of common sense should know better than binging that up.

Suffice to say, you can have your opinion but that does not make it right. Keep such opinions private until a dA representative is looking for them and you won't have a lynch mob on you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JagerKatze In reply to nimrangul [2005-06-27 02:04:31 +0000 UTC]

Oh yes, that's what we need. More thought and opinion police. The moronic vigilantes striking out in such an immature way need to be dealt with. Without the expression of our opinions we are no longer intelligent and sophisticated people. Just because a majority of people find Nudism to be 'artistic' does not make it right. Nor does it make it right for you all to persecute the people who find it to be misplaced and non-artistic.

I don't find nudism to be artistic, and the only naked body I want to ever see is my own and my wife's. Of course it'll be a given that I will see my children naked and that sort, but just because you all find it artistic, does not mean that I must. An opinion is an opinion and you cannot say that one is right and the other is wrong, because that is highly ignorant and arrogant.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

nimrangul In reply to JagerKatze [2005-06-27 02:24:17 +0000 UTC]

I just said for her to keep their trap shut, stirring shit for no reasons is stupid and I let it be known that if she had thought even for a moment before voicing an opinion nobody wanted to hear, she would have realised that.

I didn't say I disagree with her. I said she was stupid for calling down a shitstorm that could have been avoided if she used that thing between her seat and keyboard.

That her opinion is one that is unwanted and the decision has already been made could have easily been implied by the fact that there is nudity permitted. That nobody from deviantArt wanted that opinion means there was no need to bring the issue up, because they aren't considering changing it.

If it's not up for debate, you don't go bringing something up to debate about. This is no democracy, $jark and the other system operators rule the land and do as they see fit. This isn't a thing about being right, it's about things being how they are with you not being able to change it.

So you can cut down the pompous windbag routine and kindly bugger thine self off. I never said her opinion was right or wrong, only unwanted. If you want to keep nudity from your family, feel free to live in a cave. You sir were the arrogant fool, not I, in this case. Afterall, this: [link] is much better than a nipple being sucked on by a baby.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JagerKatze In reply to nimrangul [2005-06-27 02:29:30 +0000 UTC]

First of all, take note that the forum was posted in complaints. Hmm, she was complaining about something in complaints; crucify her! No. She merely stated that she wished that there was more non-nude art out there. Never said anything about completely abolish it.

Also, take note that in the picture you linked to, you can see about as much as you can if shere were to wear a bikini.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cheezopath [2005-06-26 21:26:50 +0000 UTC]

Your medieval attitude to artistic nudes is almost as cute as your gallery!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JagerKatze In reply to cheezopath [2005-06-27 00:53:56 +0000 UTC]

And your jackasstic ways of dealing with someone you disagree with is reasons to report you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cheezopath In reply to JagerKatze [2005-06-27 00:59:15 +0000 UTC]

Hypocrisy, on the other hand, isn't cute. If you want to report me, go ahead, but know that you are no less guilty than me at this very moment. Lead the cat brigade on another crusade, because this isn't holy land.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JagerKatze In reply to cheezopath [2005-06-27 01:12:52 +0000 UTC]

I'm not being a hypocrite. I'm not going through a perfectly good gallery and reporting every work as 'copywrite infringement'. I am reporting you directly to devART for harassment. Just because someone has an honest opinion different from yours does not justify the acts you have carried out. You are an ignorant and arrogant person, believing that I am on the same level as you for reporting you to devART. I am guilty of nothing other than showing devART who the true criminal is here.

If you truely believe that all of her works were copywrite infringement, then every gallery of ever person, for that matter, is copywrite infringement. Things that she had done herself, and I have watched her work on, were reported and deleted. What you have done is a highly inconsiderate act for an honest opinion. You are one of the many people that show that devART is only a place to compete for popularity and that divides the community.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

cheezopath In reply to JagerKatze [2005-06-27 15:59:47 +0000 UTC]

Report as copywright violations...? I did no such thing. Either they WERE violations, and the astute contientious member reported the rips through the proper channels which subsequently got them deleted (in which case you have no right accusing me of noticing she was breaching policy) or your friend deleted them herself and lied to you. Either way, I'm right and you're wrong. I'm now reporting the both of you for abuse.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JagerKatze In reply to cheezopath [2005-06-27 17:00:12 +0000 UTC]

In what way have I abused you? I have not gone to your page and harassed you, nor have I spammed you with notes. I merely defended a friend of mine and from the response I got from you, figured that you had reported the entire gallery. At any which way, would you mind explaining which ones 'violated policy'? I don't fully understand how any of them did.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cheezopath In reply to JagerKatze [2005-06-27 17:13:20 +0000 UTC]

Your friend spammed me. Defend that.

I never saw any of the gallery - how could I tell you how they violated policy? It was either her who deleted the images, or a PV admin acted on a tip-off from somebody else. If, by messaging me with insults and accusations you have not violated policy, you will have nothing to worry about when the PV admin reads the complaint. I am certainly not worried about your complaint.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JagerKatze In reply to cheezopath [2005-06-27 20:56:02 +0000 UTC]

I'm quite sure you 'didn't see any of the gallery'. It's pretty obvious you have when your first comment on her page was a sarcastic post about how the images are 'cute'. So she spammed you, I never stated I supported that, but you have yet to explain how I have 'harassed' you, when you are the one who came here starting crap because of her views in the forums.

Of course you aren't worried about the complaint, you are a fucking beta tester, so you believe that puts you above the rule of devART. You think that you are better and higher than everyone else because you are a beta tester. Dear god, get over yourself. You antagonized and instigated the spamming by coming to her page after her honest opinion in the complaints. Because you didn't agree with her and because you thought her opinion was stupid, you came to her page and reported her entire gallery as compywrite infringement and posted that 'witty' little remark to start a fight, and now you think you are going to get away with it merely because you are a beta tester.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cheezopath In reply to JagerKatze [2005-06-27 21:25:24 +0000 UTC]

You know what? I saw what you wrote was long, and decided not to read it. Don't contact me anymore, stop clogging my message center.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JagerKatze In reply to cheezopath [2005-06-27 21:38:02 +0000 UTC]

Oh I'm sorry, do you have a problem with intelligently thought out posts? I guess you must...maybe I can make it easier for you.

Omg You are lyke, stupid, because I don't agree with you...haha lol you are stupid...lmfao you like nude people

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kamiawolf In reply to JagerKatze [2005-06-27 03:31:37 +0000 UTC]

Be sure to post DA's reply. Im sure we'd all like to hear you get owned for reporting something that isnt agianst policy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JagerKatze In reply to kamiawolf [2005-06-27 03:37:19 +0000 UTC]

You mean reporting an ENTIRE gallery of non copywrite infringed works. Such as...

Accusations of bannable offenses, questions or comments regarding specific administrative actions, and copyright violation reports are always to be addressed to the Policy Violation Administrators, and not directed at a particular deviant. Misplaced or false accusations may be considered violations of site policy. Reports regarding deviation miscategorization should be directed towards the appropriate Tier Administrator.



So it's not against site policy, eh?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kamiawolf In reply to JagerKatze [2005-06-27 03:46:52 +0000 UTC]

what the hell are you flipping out about? Reporting things in a gallery that are agianst policy is not agianst policy. Thats why they have the "Report Policy Violation" button.

I find it rediculous for you to want to report harrassment on someone just because they reported stuff agiasnt policy. Obviously, smart one, if the pictures were not agianst policy, they wouldnt have gotten removed, duh. Stop trying to stick up for your friend if they have obviously broken the rules.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

magiccat137 In reply to kamiawolf [2005-06-27 17:47:21 +0000 UTC]

They weren't policy violations, you idiot. God you're dumb. And they did get removed, so there goes your 3-year-old logic.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kamiawolf In reply to magiccat137 [2005-06-27 18:32:51 +0000 UTC]

DA does not remove art for no reason. So either you removed them yourself for drama or they were policy violations. Its that simple.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JagerKatze In reply to kamiawolf [2005-06-27 03:52:54 +0000 UTC]

Ok. Sure. So tell me then, where do the characters Char and Xanthee come from? Mind telling me who besides my girlfriend made them up? Or possibly tell me where that poem she wrote came from? Tell me, please. I would like to know where the copywrite infringement is in EVERY SINGLE one of her works in her gallery. Please, enlighten me. And if you can't, shut up and mind your own business.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kamiawolf In reply to JagerKatze [2005-06-27 04:39:23 +0000 UTC]

DA would not delete something unless it was agiasnt policy, so you can shut up now.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JagerKatze In reply to kamiawolf [2005-06-27 04:55:23 +0000 UTC]

What a pathetic response. I've seen DA delete things without any reference point as to what it was not following. You still haven't answered why all of them have been deleted.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kamiawolf In reply to JagerKatze [2005-06-27 15:48:45 +0000 UTC]

Yes I did. they were removed because they were agiasnt policy. How is that so hard to grasp?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JagerKatze In reply to kamiawolf [2005-06-27 17:03:03 +0000 UTC]

How were they against policy? In what way were all of those images against policy? Just because devART removed them does not mean they are 'against policy'. I've had my own work that wasn't against policy removed before. I even noted devART back when they removed it and they couldn't fully explain, but stated that it was because another artist reported it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kamiawolf In reply to JagerKatze [2005-06-27 17:33:00 +0000 UTC]

Look loudmouth, if you think they arnt agianst policy, write a fucking helpdesk ticket. Thats what its for. Or maybe your little girlfriend deleted them herself. Or maybe they were, gasp! agiasnt policy. Holy gods nO! I cant fucking put the deviantions back, so what the fuck are you getting on my case for, eh? Do you see a special symbol next to my name, smart one? DA would not remove pictures unless they thought they were agianst policy. So either your friend deleted them herself to leave DA with a bang, or, and i know this is really really for your small brain to comprehend, they were agianst policy. Deal with it and move on.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

JagerKatze In reply to kamiawolf [2005-06-27 20:59:23 +0000 UTC]

I already did that you fucking moron. That's when you decided that you should start arguing with me about it. I'm sorry, you can't remember that far back? I guess that's too bad. Maybe you lost your memory back where you left your grammar and English skills.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kamiawolf In reply to JagerKatze [2005-06-27 22:05:42 +0000 UTC]

youre the one who brought up the policy violation crap, stupid. Remember my first comment? I told you to post the help desk reply from you complaining about someone reporting the deviations. I thought that would be hilarious because its fucking rediculous to report someone for reporting deviations. God, i didnt think you were THAT idiotic.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JagerKatze In reply to kamiawolf [2005-06-27 22:10:38 +0000 UTC]

Falsely reporting an entire gallery is against site policy. God, I didn't think you were THAT illiterate.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kamiawolf In reply to JagerKatze [2005-06-27 22:21:56 +0000 UTC]

Show me the FAQ or rules where it says falsely reporting something is agiasnt policy. SHOW ME THE LINK!

I never saw her damned gallery. I never reported her damn deviations. So you can fuck off now.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JagerKatze In reply to kamiawolf [2005-06-27 23:07:58 +0000 UTC]

I've showed you once, and I'll show you again you illiterate fucktard.

Accusations of bannable offenses, questions or comments regarding specific administrative actions, and copyright violation reports are always to be addressed to the Policy Violation Administrators, and not directed at a particular deviant. Misplaced or false accusations may be considered violations of site policy. Reports regarding deviation miscategorization should be directed towards the appropriate Tier Administrator.

Check the community rules and take your fucking fingers off the keyboard before you shame yourself anymore.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kamiawolf In reply to JagerKatze [2005-06-27 23:35:53 +0000 UTC]

and you think the the reports were wrong... yet the images are still removed. Hmm... looks like DA thought that the reports were legit. TAKE IT UP WITH THE HELP DESK BECAUSE I DONT CARE ABOUT YOUR CRAP!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JagerKatze In reply to kamiawolf [2005-06-27 23:49:49 +0000 UTC]

You actually think that dA databases all the images everywhere and saves old DB? You are a fool to think such a thing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kamiawolf In reply to JagerKatze [2005-06-27 23:50:26 +0000 UTC]

Ive seen them bring back a deviation... lost the comments tho.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JagerKatze In reply to kamiawolf [2005-06-27 23:53:43 +0000 UTC]

I would guess that dA updates their database every so often. Chances are that whatever person you are talking about just resubmitted after dA said it's ok, because I've never heard of such a thing even after dA was admittantly wrong.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

magiccat137 In reply to kamiawolf [2005-06-27 17:50:49 +0000 UTC]

EWWWWWWW I'M NOT HIS GIRLFRIEND, EWWWWWWWWWW! You're so stupid! Let me put this simply for you: I had some original art. It was deleted as a policy violation. So there goes BOTH YOUR ARGUMENTS. And, even though I am NOT his girlfriend, I did not delete them. DA deleted my artwork as a policy violation, even though it was not a copyright infringement, as my friend Sim (Jager's girlfriend) asked me to draw some of those pictures for her since she's such a lousy artist.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kamiawolf In reply to magiccat137 [2005-06-27 18:40:50 +0000 UTC]

your not? well then i think you and him have some issues with communitcation, because he seems to think you and him are going out: [link] calls you his girlfriend and everything.

look, all im hearing is blah blah blah. Ill repeat myself one LAST time for the both of you. And if you are too stupid to get it then, thats your problem and you should take it up with your neuro doctor or your psycologist. DA DOES NOT REMOVE ART FOR NO REASON. They do not remove art just because. They only remove art that is a policy violation. GET THAT THROUGH YOUR HEAD. Either your art was removed by you yourself as some sort of drama fest. Or your pictures were somehow agiasnt policy. That it. Thats all there is to it. DEAL WITH IT.

Im not a fucking admin, so what exactly are you expecting me to do? Do you see a special little symbol next to my name? no. i cant bring back your stupid deviantions so shut up already. Jesus Christ. If you have a problem with DA removing your art, take it up with the fucking helpdesk. *gasp* thats what its for. Either that or deal with it. Because bitching at me is pointles. POINTLESS!!!!! I dont even know what you hope to acheve but its POINTLESS!!!! GOD.

If you and your buddy's next reply says anything about your art getting removed but its not a policy violation, im reporting you to the Stupid Police. Go talk to the helpdesk, idiot.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

JagerKatze In reply to kamiawolf [2005-06-27 20:50:26 +0000 UTC]

So, if you aren't an admin, what qualifies you to state that they don't delete art for any old reason? Are you truely that simple minded that devART has convinced you that this is true. Also, if you had any skills in grammar and readin comprehension, I stated that magiccat137 drew some charas that my girlfriend had created. I never stated that magiccat was my girlfriend or anything like that.

None of her works were against policy. There, I said it; report me to the 'Stupid Police'. You are quite the arrogant moron, believing you are correct in this matter. Unless you are a direct representative or an admin of devART, you are not qualified to state that they don't remove art without reason.

Also, don't start bitching at us because we are telling you they weren't against policy. You were the one who came here in the first place, obviously looking to start shit.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kamiawolf In reply to JagerKatze [2005-06-27 22:15:51 +0000 UTC]

Dumbass, what the hell would DA have to gain for randomly removing deviations for no reason? Nothing. Go talk to an actual admin and suggest that and they will call you fucking crazy.

Also, i dont know who the hell this simkat person is. No one mentioned her so how the hell am i sappose to read your fucking mind? You commented on THIS user page about your girlfriend, how the hell am i sappose to know who you are talking about, eh? dont be vague, dick.

Obviously, like ive said over and over. either the works were agianst policy or she removed them herself. WHAT THE HELL DOES DA HAVE TO GAIN FROM REMOVING WORK?! NOTHING NOTHING NOTHING NOTHING NOTHING! Go talk to an admin, like i said. THEY WOULDNT REMOVE IT WITHOUT A REASON! END OF FUCKING STORY! GOD. You have to be the dencest person ever. THere is no fucking conspiricy. If DA removed the art, they did it for a reason. I think that your little friend just did it on her own. CHRIST.

You were the one starting shit, accuseing other people of breaking policy by reporting shit and threatening harrassment for no reason. so dont give me that "You started it" shit. YOU started it. Want me to link back to your crap?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JagerKatze In reply to kamiawolf [2005-06-27 23:06:09 +0000 UTC]

What does DA have to gain? Nothing, but they have nothing to lose either. They get a report of copywrite infringement and take it down ASAP so they can save their own dictatorship asses from lawsuits. You don't know who she is, but you jump all over me and even manage to link to my gallery, yet you fail to notice simkat saying she loves it and she loves me on my front page, aye? Who is the dense one? I never said shit with you to begin with. Noone said a word to you, and you decide to come on in and start taking command and acting as if you know all.

No conspiracy? That doesn't matter. As I have said on numerous occasions, devART is just another place to fight for popularity where the admins could care less about the smaller artists and other people's opinions. So what if dA has nothing to gain from removing art for no reason. On the same note I could ask you what President Bush has to gain from rigging elections.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kamiawolf In reply to JagerKatze [2005-06-27 23:13:19 +0000 UTC]

i felt no need to look in your gallery, so why would i see simkat. Ive never seen her before, she was never brought up by name so dont expect me to READ YOUR FUCKING MIND when you mention girlfriend and not leave a name. All you said was blah blah blah girlfriend on magiccat's page. Ive never seen any of magiccat's pictures so i how the hell am i sappose to know about your god damned girlfriend. rediculous. it doesnt even matter.

"President Bush has to gain from rigging elections."
God that is the stupidest thing ive ever heard. Oh... maybe he has, um, the presidency to gain? Oh no thats not it. Maybe power in the UN to do with as he pleases. Oh that cant be it either. Wow, i guess nothing. He just sits there doing nothing. dumbass.

Im tired of your complete stupidity. Go talk to someone who cares, or who could actually do something to help you. Im ignoring you now.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>