HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS

| overseer

overseer ♂️ [363854] [2003-03-04 04:59:24 +0000 UTC] "The neutrinos are in bloom!" (Unknown)

# Statistics

Favourites: 4236; Deviations: 194; Watchers: 1775

Watching: 406; Pageviews: 136974; Comments Made: 23200; Friends: 406

# Interests

Favorite visual artist: My wife > www.deviantart.com/treeclimber
Favorite movies: Do you really ...
Favorite TV shows: ... have to ask?
Favorite games: Reality. Level 39.
Favorite gaming platform: PC
Tools of the Trade: Lightwave, Vue, Photoshop, Bryce, Terragen & Patience.
Other Interests: A kiss to build a dream on.

# Comments

Comments: 1007

TreeClimber [2021-07-30 02:27:16 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

nxclass [2018-09-21 23:15:31 +0000 UTC]

I am a Star Trek fan. Your 3D images are very beautiful, perfect

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

virtenebris [2018-07-13 19:40:25 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for faving my work!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

WayneBenedet [2017-04-26 13:47:17 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for adding a

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ulimann644 [2017-04-02 07:44:30 +0000 UTC]

Thanx for

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

overseer In reply to ulimann644 [2017-04-03 16:53:14 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ulimann644 [2017-03-30 10:00:26 +0000 UTC]

Thanx for my space-dock

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

overseer In reply to ulimann644 [2017-04-03 16:53:23 +0000 UTC]

You're most welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

WatchforHawkins [2016-07-22 03:10:27 +0000 UTC]

Everything in your gallery is perfect!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

overseer In reply to WatchforHawkins [2016-07-24 23:03:54 +0000 UTC]

Thank you kindly!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WatchforHawkins In reply to overseer [2016-07-24 23:11:42 +0000 UTC]

No problem! And by the way, have you seen Star Trek Beyond, yet?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

overseer In reply to WatchforHawkins [2016-07-28 04:57:55 +0000 UTC]

No, I'm afraid I haven't.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WatchforHawkins In reply to overseer [2016-07-28 13:21:24 +0000 UTC]

Oh, I just saw it and I really recommend it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

overseer In reply to WatchforHawkins [2016-08-01 06:59:12 +0000 UTC]

I'm sure I will get around to it eventually. Thanks for the recommendation.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

brownsdragon [2016-06-30 05:07:56 +0000 UTC]

Your gallery is a jaw dropper! Very cool collection of spaceships and all!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

overseer In reply to brownsdragon [2016-07-08 21:08:00 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ObsidianObscure [2016-06-23 23:14:16 +0000 UTC]

sup?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

WayneBenedet [2016-06-20 15:11:16 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Alexert [2016-05-04 22:09:57 +0000 UTC]

Happy star wars day!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

overseer In reply to Alexert [2016-05-05 02:32:17 +0000 UTC]

Likewise!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ObsidianObscure [2016-05-02 22:59:09 +0000 UTC]

yoooooooooooooo

want aΒ photomanip?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Marrekie [2016-04-26 05:56:06 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the watch. I appreciate it. Love your gallery mate.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

overseer In reply to Marrekie [2016-04-28 21:16:17 +0000 UTC]

Thank you kindly!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Homocynical [2016-04-12 13:11:49 +0000 UTC]

Your work is amazing... lighting and composition choices is fantastic, and so nice to see some love given to more obscure sci-fi properties as well as the big ones

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

overseer In reply to Homocynical [2016-04-13 03:58:54 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, that's very kind! I pretty much like everything and anything science-fiction, with an obvious, stronger affinity to Star Trek.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JamesF63 [2016-04-07 12:57:26 +0000 UTC]

Many thanks for the faves!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

overseer In reply to JamesF63 [2016-04-07 14:54:54 +0000 UTC]

You're most welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ObsidianObscure [2016-03-26 00:53:09 +0000 UTC]

Id also like to have you in my new group called "Paradigm-Prime"

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

overseer In reply to ObsidianObscure [2016-03-27 03:45:13 +0000 UTC]

Why not.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ObsidianObscure In reply to overseer [2016-03-27 21:27:46 +0000 UTC]

^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

XFozzboute [2016-03-25 21:52:19 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

overseer In reply to XFozzboute [2016-03-25 23:41:13 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Angie-Pictures [2016-03-25 18:44:56 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

overseer In reply to Angie-Pictures [2016-03-25 20:33:10 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ObsidianObscure [2016-03-24 19:59:13 +0000 UTC]

*Gasp*! Y-you... you donated 84 points. to fill up my tiny 100 point donation bar...

why?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

overseer In reply to ObsidianObscure [2016-03-24 22:53:44 +0000 UTC]

Had them, wasn't using them, didn't like the empty bar? All of the above work. No particular reason other than. If you like consider it a thank you for the watch.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ObsidianObscure In reply to overseer [2016-03-25 01:42:10 +0000 UTC]

Well.. they mean nothing to me... i didnt earn 'em or ask for 'em... ;_;

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

overseer In reply to ObsidianObscure [2016-03-25 02:17:10 +0000 UTC]

My apologies.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

ObsidianObscure In reply to overseer [2016-03-26 00:59:08 +0000 UTC]

*pat pats~*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ObsidianObscure In reply to overseer [2016-03-25 19:45:04 +0000 UTC]

Its alright, it wasnt your fault... ill just keep the points.. and put my new point donation goal to 200

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

NewPlanComics [2016-03-24 03:47:41 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for the recent of USS Yamato (NCC-91992) drawn by . Please take a moment to visit the artist's page and let him know what you think of his incredible work on my Star Trek vessel.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Preettisen [2016-03-20 05:59:36 +0000 UTC]

Thx so much for the points
I love your work!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

overseer In reply to Preettisen [2016-03-20 06:44:27 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, and you're most welcome.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Swaptrick [2016-03-08 15:18:47 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the watch man!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

overseer In reply to Swaptrick [2016-03-08 15:39:53 +0000 UTC]

Sure thing!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Swaptrick [2016-03-07 13:30:43 +0000 UTC]

Oh man I love your work, I am a huge ST:TNG nerd and I love all of the others as well. Using several of your pieces as wallpapers now. Do you use 3DSM or Daz or Maya? What are your thoughts on the upcoming CBS ST series?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

overseer In reply to Swaptrick [2016-03-07 17:03:53 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much. I'm pretty much in the same boat there; all started with TNG for me, nearly 30 years ago...

As far as software is concerned, neither of those actually. I have been using Lightwave ever since I started getting more serious with this kind of art work, and after I did, I found out that is actually what they used for the initial CG shots in Star Trek and a lot of other sci-fi movies/shows (Battlestar Galactica for instance). I have played with other 3D packages (trueSpace, Bryce, Vue, DAZ Studio, Poser, Blender, Wings3D), but Lightwave is the one that makes the most sense to me, and its render engine really is something else! I've not found the need for an external render engine/plug-in at all so far. It lives up to its name for sure. In more recent versions it also has an OpenGL based preview mode that gives me a very close idea what the lighting and textures in the final render will look like. That helps a lot with scene setups! I usually put a little bit of the overall process in the descriptions of my submissions as well.

A little background story on Lightwave; the ST:VOY intro was rendered with it, and if you pay close attention, towards the end, when the ship swoops by just before it goes to warp, you can see a small texture error (in form of a square) at the underside of the engineering hull. It was such an undertaking to render this back in the day (mid 1990s), that they never fixed it. Unless you know it's there you won't notice; I even overlook it, if I don't think about it.

As for the upcoming series; not much is known, I am pleased they got Brian Fuller on board since he did some stories for STS9 (undoubtedly the best character developing show after TNG to date), and Hannibal. I'm glad they're planning on a new ship and crew, but I am hoping, with all my heart, that it will be set in the prime universe, and not the JJ 'verse. The latter would need to be really convincing for me, or I'll pass. I appreciate the JJ films on a technical level for sure, but to me they're merely an attempt at turning Star Trek into Star Wars to make it more accessible to the mainstream audience, without the need to grasp the deeper meaning Gene Roddenberry placed so much emphasis on when he created the show. I can watch the movies, but I don't consider them true Trek. In that instance I'm somewhat of purist I guess...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Swaptrick In reply to overseer [2016-03-07 20:44:02 +0000 UTC]

Regarding the new series, I also hope its in the regular timeline. I respect JJ for doing the alternate timeline thing, rather than just saying none of the original stuff ever happened. I feel he deliberately created a separate universe so it wouldn't conflict with the series too much. I think it's a good bet that the new show will be in the original universe, as CBS doesn't own the rights to the film anyway, that's Paramount. I'd like to see them jump ahead another 200-300 years similar to ST to STTNG. Maybe with the Enterprise G or H. We've had too much of series set in the 24th century, and too many Star Treks not featuring an actual Enterprise ship. They've gone back in time, they've done a non-ship based show, and a non-enterprise based show. In my opinion the only place to go from here is Enterprise, and a couple centuries into the future.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

overseer In reply to Swaptrick [2016-03-08 00:28:51 +0000 UTC]

Well, perhaps. I'm not sure. Going too far in the future could also move away too much. Ideally I don't want this to turn into a "time exploration" show, because ultimately that is where it would lead. And to go "Enterprise", well, that might be a choice, but then there are so many other ships we haven't seen, ships that were mentioned so many times. I don't know. As long as they keep it closer to what Star Trek is about, exploration, scientific discovery, and in the prime universe, I'm game. Shame they can't turn Titan into a TV show. Those novels had some excellent stories. With visual effects there is nothing that can't be explored. I mean, there is always room for a little action, but I'm tired of the Borg, I'm tired of endless wars (even though, to their credit, DS9 did a great job to show all sides of a war, from heroism, to sadness, to despair, to loss, to madness; kudos for sure), still; enough is enough. Most of my favorite episodes in any of the shows are about scientific exploration; that is what sets Star Trek apart from most other science-fiction. But I have long given up on expectations. Usually nothing ever happens how I expect it, so... I will sit in my corner and wait for the utterly unexpected to bear down on me.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Swaptrick In reply to overseer [2016-03-08 15:18:27 +0000 UTC]

I love the exploration aspect too, but what I enjoyed more was the character development of TNG, and the sometimes bizarre look into the human mind, sanity, and existence in general. Think Phantasms, Sub Rosa, Schisms, Night Terrors, The Mind's Eye etc. Even showing Picard dealing with the aftermath of the Borg assimilation, like his breakdown and confiding in his brother about the experience on the episode "Family", with the line from Louis Picard "So... my brother is a human being after all." All of these things really helped to illustrate the humanity of the characters, and allowed viewers to connect and relate to them in very real ways. Other Treks had a few of these moments, many of them very powerful, but none with the abundance and consistency of TNG. Ultimately, that aspect is something I hope they can recapture in the new series no matter what time/ship it is.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>