CBU2029 [2008-03-20 08:24:23 +0000 UTC]

for the fave ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Xhizors [2008-03-19 04:34:55 +0000 UTC]

Hey.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

josemanchado [2007-03-16 11:44:01 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for watch me I hope you'll like my little and my next picts, please visit it your favs are just my reward for my picts

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

edaoust [2006-10-05 16:44:16 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much for the !

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mattmillsart [2006-09-01 00:09:20 +0000 UTC]

hey, thanks for the fav.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

gdpr-1638154 [2006-08-28 19:03:07 +0000 UTC]

Hi there; just visited to thank for the faves and watch!

About your previous comment: i try to make constructive critics when i look at a work that has some minor flaw. However, if i see a work that i feel is very bad, i usually prefer to stay quiet. Guess it doesn't make sense to say something like "that's rubish", does it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

perlpimp [2006-08-27 16:20:13 +0000 UTC]

For critique, deviant art covers whole range of works starting with kindergarden scrawlies to top-notch artist work, either commercial or otherwise. It is given that placing good comments on the site of the person is good karma, however if someone sees something one can suggest, that is negative about one's work, specific aspect would that be misplaced and taken without grain of intent understanding?

I mean it is always great to hear postives about your work. However the negative critique is where the artist can pick up their skills. In the end if critiques are baseless, one can be denounced as troll.However just like deviant art has full range of work qualities, internet has as much range is quality of people.

Question is , what is proper protocol showing your critique without being an ass and being ignored, (which would defeat value of the critique).

peace man. roger out.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

perlpimp [2006-08-12 22:47:50 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, well..

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bumpyduey [2006-05-20 21:10:48 +0000 UTC]

Welcome to DA

👍: 0 ⏩: 0