HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS

| trainboi

trainboi [14831600] [2010-08-29 02:12:01 +0000 UTC] "Random Porter!" (United States)

# Statistics

Favourites: 946; Deviations: 774; Watchers: 262

Watching: 23; Pageviews: 53818; Comments Made: 2884; Friends: 23

# Interests

Favorite bands / musical artists: Lindsey Stirling, Dropkick Murphys, and the Vitamin String Quartet, among others
Favorite writers: Terry Pratchett
Favorite games: Sid Meier's Railroads!, Railroad Tycoon 3, Trainz Simulator(if that counts)
Tools of the Trade: Blender 2.69, Trainz 2012
Other Interests: RRing, Modeling, Kits

# About me

Blender modeler and all around shortline fan.

Photo by

# Comments

Comments: 386

Train099 [2023-04-18 00:49:28 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TaionaFan369 [2020-03-18 05:55:32 +0000 UTC]

Happy birthday

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TaionaFan369 [2019-03-18 06:31:18 +0000 UTC]

Happy birthday

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jonathan-Asiamah [2019-03-17 15:36:48 +0000 UTC]

Happy birthday!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheNewEnglandForney [2019-03-17 12:16:38 +0000 UTC]

Happy Birthday!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Steamerthesteamtrain [2019-01-17 23:38:18 +0000 UTC]

Mind if I ask why do you put an enginespec in tenders?
Specifically the D41 and the V2.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainboi In reply to Steamerthesteamtrain [2019-01-24 04:01:37 +0000 UTC]

If you haven't got the update to that, you should. I put an enginespec in the tenders of my UK stuff for a while because I was working with Brian Snook's general script library, which is very nice but the tender script doesn't support mesh toggles, so I had to make them a locomotive with a 0hp spec to make tender headlamps work. In the update, I retrofitted the insert for his script library to include the RCH headcode setup, so now they can work in tandem, admittedly at the cost of a little bit of weirdness in the properties window as the two scripts struggle with each other to put together a single property window.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Steamerthesteamtrain In reply to trainboi [2019-01-24 05:44:09 +0000 UTC]

Oh thanks for telling me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EdwardJSmithTitanic [2018-11-03 03:58:30 +0000 UTC]

I swear, I have seen you before...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainboi In reply to EdwardJSmithTitanic [2018-11-04 20:46:59 +0000 UTC]

...I'm not sure how to respond to that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EdwardJSmithTitanic In reply to trainboi [2018-11-04 20:57:36 +0000 UTC]

Hm.
Are you on Discord?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainboi In reply to EdwardJSmithTitanic [2018-11-05 21:29:40 +0000 UTC]

...Yes?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

EdwardJSmithTitanic In reply to trainboi [2018-11-05 22:49:16 +0000 UTC]

That probably explains it. You might be in some servers I am also in.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NTSEFAN [2018-03-18 04:27:58 +0000 UTC]

Happy Birthday man!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cooldude7208 [2018-03-17 23:40:47 +0000 UTC]

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY BIIIIIIIIIIIIRRRRRRRTTTHHHHDAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainboi In reply to cooldude7208 [2018-03-17 23:55:34 +0000 UTC]

ZOMGWAT. XD
Thanks dude, I've been doing some model railroading stuff today and not much else! XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cooldude7208 In reply to trainboi [2018-03-18 09:23:49 +0000 UTC]

model railroading ey? What scale?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainboi In reply to cooldude7208 [2018-03-20 03:17:06 +0000 UTC]

HO. I was fortunate enough to run across three Yosemite Valley moguls recently which I have been working to fit DCC in (currently 29 is the only one fully converted) so I've been fixing up appropriate stock for them, including UTLX Type V "Frameless" tank cars and a few Pullmans, as well as smoother trackwork to accommodate the tighter tolerances used on brass engines.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cooldude7208 In reply to trainboi [2018-03-20 06:46:31 +0000 UTC]

nice

I only got a few bachmann thomas HO scale models, I haven't used my HO layout it years, which makes me sad

BUT, later down the line, when I move out, I'm planning on building a better layout, and with more scales than just HO

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SteampunkPup261 [2018-03-17 17:20:48 +0000 UTC]

Happy birthday!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainboi In reply to SteampunkPup261 [2018-03-17 23:19:31 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SteampunkPup261 In reply to trainboi [2018-03-17 23:21:11 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome! Hope you have a good birthday.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FavoriteArtMan [2017-08-27 00:48:35 +0000 UTC]

Excuse me

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainboi In reply to FavoriteArtMan [2017-08-27 01:20:13 +0000 UTC]

Yes?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FavoriteArtMan In reply to trainboi [2017-08-27 02:20:28 +0000 UTC]

Those deviations of yours about the Whirlwind and the storm, I don't suppose that, as opposed to the Leviathan, they're what the original engines looked like back in the 19th century?

I mean, I've seen photos and have sprites of the Jupiter, 119 and Leviathan, but I've never seen photos of the Storm and Whirlwind.

So, I don't suppose, based on your deviations, that's what they once looked like, that long ago?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainboi In reply to FavoriteArtMan [2017-08-27 03:15:31 +0000 UTC]

It's what they would have looked like when they were built. The locomotive builders painted engines, back in the day, so until an engine needed a major overhaul or badly needed a repaint, they would wear whatever paint scheme their builders preferred. In the case of the Jupiter, Storm, Whirlwind, and Leviathan (as well as all the rest of Schenectady's locomotives, at the end of the 1860s), the builder was a very proud Scot, who painted his engines in Prussian blue and Crimson lake based on the colors of the Caledonian Railway.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NTSEFAN [2017-03-18 09:55:03 +0000 UTC]

Happy Birthday man!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TaionaFan369 [2017-03-18 05:48:23 +0000 UTC]

Happy Birthday and Paddy's day

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Iscreamer1 [2017-03-18 05:09:28 +0000 UTC]

Happy birthday! If you are looking for sound effects for your works, click here: www.sounds-resource.com/pc_com…

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

OwenConcorde [2017-03-18 02:40:47 +0000 UTC]

Happy Birthday!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheNewEnglandForney [2017-03-17 16:20:09 +0000 UTC]

Happy Birthday!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jonathan-Asiamah [2017-03-17 11:03:34 +0000 UTC]

Happy birthday!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

nascarruler391 [2017-03-17 10:52:34 +0000 UTC]

Happy Birthday

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DragonLeader1 [2016-12-30 22:04:35 +0000 UTC]

Excuse me. Is there a way for me to download your model railroad route? 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainboi In reply to DragonLeader1 [2016-12-31 06:24:15 +0000 UTC]

No, because none really made it far enough in TS12 to be ready for release and I am unsatisfied with how walls cast shadows in TANE.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonLeader1 In reply to trainboi [2016-12-31 14:24:18 +0000 UTC]

That is understandable.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

gunslinger87 [2016-11-11 01:46:07 +0000 UTC]

Hey friend, I have a quick question for you. Sice you've been working and researching the Central and Southern Pacific railroads, what would the colors would their passenger cars sport between the 1890s and 1905?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainboi In reply to gunslinger87 [2016-11-11 06:16:30 +0000 UTC]

That I am not so familiar with...If I had to guess it would be a coach green similar to the SP heavyweight cars that came out a decade or so later. Pullmans at the time could be a mix of several different types...see a couple here: sandcrr.blogspot.com/search?up…
Standard colors at the time were the brown and gold seen on the two cars ahead...green was nothing new but most of the palace/sleeper car companies at the time used brown. But check me, don't quote me! XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

gunslinger87 In reply to trainboi [2016-11-17 19:19:25 +0000 UTC]

Hey, I have another question. I've been looking at the livery on your C&C loco liveries and I'm thinking of revising my M&P loco schemes and was wondering what the letter font is on your C&C tenders?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainboi In reply to gunslinger87 [2016-11-17 23:45:29 +0000 UTC]

It isn't a specific "font" - Andrew Brandon drew up the lettering and numbering on the C&C locos based on photos. The closest thing is Bou College, which you could use to represent nearly any basic Baldwin lettering.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

gunslinger87 In reply to trainboi [2017-01-08 05:26:23 +0000 UTC]

Sorry for how long it took me to reply. The relocation has kind of put a damper on a lot of things.
But anyway, thanks again for the font suggestion, it looks great on the M&P locomotives! Much better that what I originally had. Thanks again!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

gunslinger87 In reply to trainboi [2016-11-14 06:26:14 +0000 UTC]

Hmmm, I'll keep that in mind. Thanks for the blog link! I've been flowing it alread, but missed that post somehow.

I appreciate what you were able to share. I'll do some more hunting and digging around.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KCStudiosCA [2016-08-05 01:16:16 +0000 UTC]

As a person who loves the Virginia and Truckee Railroad, what do you think of my depictions of the Reno?

Here are my two samples: kendallcollins.deviantart.com/… kendallcollins.deviantart.com/…

and the Inyo: kendallcollins.deviantart.com/…

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainboi In reply to KCStudiosCA [2016-08-05 04:41:57 +0000 UTC]

Not sure about the Diamond and Sunflower stacks; both engines wore capped stacks in the later days. I think Inyo had a Sunflower when she was sold, though, and id the Diamond stack is based on a specific photo I'd like to see it.
As far as paint, the toolbox lids and reservoir brackets would have been black, but otherwise they're very good.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

KCStudiosCA In reply to trainboi [2016-08-05 06:35:40 +0000 UTC]

I should add that the headlight is actually the one used at Old Tucson Studios. Even though having the locomotive restored to the way it was in the '30s would be nice, the headlight should stay since it's based on the turn of century look.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KCStudiosCA In reply to trainboi [2016-08-05 04:54:11 +0000 UTC]

When I did those images, I used only one base engine for it: The Reno.

Now, for the Sunflower, I wrote in the comments that that was the look when the engine was sold.

The diamond stack was just random idea since the locomotive's most famous look was this: photos.aroundcarson.com/773-80… and it was a probable that Hollywood occasion got it right...once in a while in a slim way: wanderer.jamesfouchard.com/All… on a sister engine.

I've used multiple images from Mallory Hope Ferrel's book from the V&T for the main drawing, and all of them showed the No. 11 always having the brass bands, although the reservoir brackets were an extra mile due to a photo from the '70s when it appeared in "The Young Pioneers" as C&NW 673.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainboi In reply to KCStudiosCA [2016-08-06 02:01:32 +0000 UTC]

I can verify the brass elsewhere on the engines; as I recall there is a good color photo of Reno in the '40s that I can show when I get home.

The same issue was on the Inyo, since apparently descriptions aren't visible on a phone. Rest assured, however, that I did try to find that first.

As for the Diamond stack, I figured as much but I don't know of a time, even in movies, that a V&T engine looked quite like that. It does look good, though.

If you're looking for another good version, you might try ca. 1905 when most V&T engines were coal fired with Diamond stacks and raised headlights. Reno also wore a stovepipe stack a little later, and it looked very smart.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KCStudiosCA In reply to trainboi [2016-08-06 02:23:25 +0000 UTC]

I've seen that color image in Ferrel's book, and it always impresses me everytime I see it.

That colored image of a diamond stack V&T engine was the Inyo as it appeared in the Wild Wild West television series. It also appeared this McClintock starring John Wayne and Maureen O'Hara: www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9wNbD… in the same colors and stack. 

I just picked the '30s look because it's my favorite look for the engine. The same can be said about my version of Nevada County Narrow Gauge No. 5: www.rgusrail.com/album/cancngr… (Including the steel cab). As pretty as the very colorful engine, there's something about a black used locomotive in the '30s that grabs me. The diamond stack on No. 5 is also neat as well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trainboi In reply to KCStudiosCA [2016-08-06 03:30:05 +0000 UTC]

The diamond stack is a Hollywood addition; in the '30s she wore an extremely short stovepipe stack. It does look very good though, better than the '30s stack to be honest.

I wouldn't expect you to take on one of the colorful liveries; the black livery was adopted in the late 1890s. The 1902-1910s variation is closest to Genoa's restored form, but with a raised kerosene light.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KCStudiosCA In reply to trainboi [2016-08-06 03:40:07 +0000 UTC]

Funny you should say that: kendallcollins.deviantart.com/…

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>