Comments: 106
zapplebow [2015-04-06 17:48:43 +0000 UTC]
Cutest Russian killing machine I have ever seen.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ARTZ2012 [2012-12-10 18:54:27 +0000 UTC]
Very good! Watch the video: [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Herricks [2011-12-26 04:46:15 +0000 UTC]
It's Thundercracker!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
yellowsmoke321 [2011-10-13 04:08:51 +0000 UTC]
sweet rendition of this Sukhoi SU-27 !
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Airforce1985 [2010-12-14 12:16:35 +0000 UTC]
Some "friends!!" They are nukliarizing Iran(and no doubt all the terrorist nations in this miserable world!!!) We should have wasted you in WWII!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Airforce1985 In reply to Barthalamule [2011-02-07 14:08:09 +0000 UTC]
Take a look at russia's history and tell me they are innocent. Pissed at Russia? HELL YEAH!!! Their latest insult to freedom is that they helped nuclearize Iran, FUCKING IRAN!!! THEY ARE HELPING TO START WWIII!!! THEY HAVEN'T CHANGED AT ALL DAM EM ALL TO HELL WHERE THEY ALL BELONG!!! READ UP ON YOUR HISTORY, JUNIOR.
👍: 0 ⏩: 4
ARTZ2012 In reply to Airforce1985 [2012-12-10 19:16:35 +0000 UTC]
Во-первых, Россия никогда не пыталась завязать суровой войны, а даже наоборот, защищалась.
Так и произошло во второй мировой войне. А между прочим, только благодаря СССР завершилась Великая Отечественная Война, так как Америка и её прародитель Англия не вложили ни капли усилий в победу. А Америка сразу после дня победы 9 мая, 1 сентября скинула на уже сдавшуюся Японию атомные бомбы (Херасима и Нагасаки).
Во-вторых, Россия всегда была гостеприимней других стран.
Из всего этого следует, что всемирное зло не Россия, а Америка!
В-третьих, чтобы не изобрела Америка, то всего лишь большой "мыльный пузырь",
1) Когда Америка вошла в Ирак, их танки пробивали "загадочным" оружием. Тогда американцы обвинили Россию в том, что она продала Ираку высокотехнологичное оружие. На самом деле иракцы воевали СССРскими (60 года) гранатомётами.
2) Исламские террористы и боевики никогда не покупают Хаммер, а больше всего берут Русские УАЗики и Ладу Ниву, так как даже у моего дяди Лада Нива с 80 года, а она даже ниразу не ломалась.
3) Винтовка м16 не выдеривает ни одного испытания в экстримальных условиях, а АК-47, 74 - работают при любых условиях, хоть в воду кинь, хоть в песок закопай
- затвор передёрнул и в бой, а м16 после таких испытаний клинит.
Вот вам и Америка...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Barthalamule In reply to Airforce1985 [2011-02-20 06:58:37 +0000 UTC]
You're absolutely right, Russia is completely evil. Meanwhile here in America we mind our own business and never prop up pro American governments throughout the world, lol Eygpt. And we especially don't militarize or 'nukliarizing' other nations in the Middle East.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fabbred85 [2010-11-04 14:52:38 +0000 UTC]
Gostei dos detalhes e das cores! Parabéns pelo trabalho!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
14-bis In reply to fabbred85 [2010-11-04 15:13:09 +0000 UTC]
Valeu .
eu tava torcendo pra Forca aerea brisileira comprar uns sukhois , mas pelo visto vamos ter que nos contentar com Mirages mesmo.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fabbred85 In reply to 14-bis [2010-11-04 20:24:15 +0000 UTC]
Pouco antes da "eliminação" do Sukhoi do FX-2,eu e meus companheiros discutíamos bastante sobre o programa, e a maioria ,inclusive eu, concordava que ele era a melhor escolha.
Sobre a suposta vinda de mais alguns Mirage 2000, eu não o que vai acontecer!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
14-bis In reply to fabbred85 [2010-11-04 20:30:01 +0000 UTC]
eu imaginei que , com o tamanho continental do BR , um jato de longo alcance como o da familia sukhoy seria o mais apropriado .fora o fato que a mecanica martelinho de ouro dos russos teria tudo a ver com a gente , HA HA .
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fabbred85 In reply to 14-bis [2010-11-04 21:12:16 +0000 UTC]
Esses são fatores bastante positivos.
Só uma curiosidade, qualquer membro da família, não cabe nos hangares utilizidos pela FAB, com exceção com os de Natal e Anápolis!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
14-bis In reply to fabbred85 [2010-11-04 21:17:53 +0000 UTC]
pensei nisso .
imagina tentar colocar um su33 no Minas Gerais .
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fabbred85 In reply to 14-bis [2010-11-04 21:21:50 +0000 UTC]
Imagina tentar colocar o Minas Gerais no mar?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
14-bis In reply to fabbred85 [2010-11-04 23:14:01 +0000 UTC]
Nada que DUrex goma arabica nao deem um jeito , ha ha .
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fabbred85 In reply to 14-bis [2010-11-04 23:20:43 +0000 UTC]
Quem sabe não de certo com o F-103...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
WormWoodTheStar [2010-09-07 11:59:10 +0000 UTC]
One of those (from Belarussian AF) crashed last year during Radom Air Show. The pilots disobeyed the order to eject and led the machine away from spectators, over the inhabited area. After this they had no more time nor altitude to bail out...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Airforce1985 [2010-08-26 23:03:34 +0000 UTC]
THIS IS HILLARIOUS! JUST NEEDS A FACE AND TEETH!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ddntati [2010-06-26 08:04:23 +0000 UTC]
good work
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
EZReader111 [2010-06-08 20:52:19 +0000 UTC]
When I was in the military and taught equipment recognition I realized we were in serious trouble because most military personnel had a tough time distinguishing between say one jet and another. On exercise or actual combat they may not see national markings, or even the entire object. Personally I always concluded my lectures with "If you can't identify it, don't shoot!" and kept my fingers crossed. Your cartoony exaggeration is actually what the military should be looking for. If you could collect all such paintings of your aircraft together for a book, say with one page each with one of your paintings and another facing page with an actual description of the aircraft and a few legitimate photos, I am positive you would have a profitable book (Everywhere there's a military base with a book store you'd have a market). You could start off with just fighters and expand to different aircraft and mobile equipment (tanks, AFV's, MICV's etc..) for subsequent volumes. I believe you just might diplace Jane's in this field. The saddest oxymoron in the english language is "friendly fire." This may surprise you, but your art might just save lives. Incidentally, I wouldn't put it past some bright intelligence operators to already be using your artwork for their own aircraft recognition lectures.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
14-bis In reply to EZReader111 [2010-06-09 19:59:28 +0000 UTC]
hi Chris.
its an interesting way to see this .
I never thought to get money from this plane arts , but its good to know that it can save some lives , ha ha .
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AngusX [2010-05-01 13:15:13 +0000 UTC]
Hot stuff beautiful work.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
NavJAG [2010-04-30 19:37:04 +0000 UTC]
Awesome - love the intakes!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
El-Bronco [2010-04-30 04:16:49 +0000 UTC]
Awesome!! A SD artist!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
shelbs2 [2010-04-30 00:04:06 +0000 UTC]
haha thats awsome XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PriscillaTR [2010-04-29 18:48:00 +0000 UTC]
Que absurdo q vc é! Essa série de sds de maquina de combate estão mto mto mto legais! <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
14-bis In reply to PriscillaTR [2010-04-29 19:18:59 +0000 UTC]
pra vc ver que nao adianta me rotular
amanha sou capaz de comecar uma serie de ilustracoes com ...sei lah , tortas e pudins , ha ha .
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PriscillaTR In reply to 14-bis [2010-04-29 20:25:33 +0000 UTC]
E isso q eu mais gosto em vc! A sua arte é super versatil! <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
hellbat [2010-04-29 15:32:31 +0000 UTC]
Excellent!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
the-c-drive [2010-04-28 15:31:08 +0000 UTC]
Man... I have not seen you do any aircraft related art in a long time. keep it up.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KyJIaK [2010-04-28 13:57:15 +0000 UTC]
Nakonec , otechestvennaya voennaya tehnika !
14-BIS , PECIIEKT !
RESPECT !
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
animedevildog [2010-04-28 10:04:13 +0000 UTC]
This is awesome! Do you have plans to do any others?
I'd love to see an F-14 in this style!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
FTO-Sete [2010-04-28 03:20:32 +0000 UTC]
Eu gosto bastante dessas aves de guerra, embora eu prefira as mais antigas indiscutivelmente, tambem adoro aviaes dos primordios do vôo em 1900.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
14-bis In reply to FTO-Sete [2010-04-28 03:27:01 +0000 UTC]
primordios do vôo em 1900 ?
vc quer dizer ......como o 14 BIS ??!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FTO-Sete In reply to 14-bis [2010-04-28 03:34:55 +0000 UTC]
Mas claro, eu tambem já fiz algumas desenhos dessas maquinas em minha outra galeria, curioso é que na epoca eu achei poucas fotos em detalhes do 14 Bis e nunca desenhei um, mas fiz um modelo dele em cartolina que ficou legal pra epoca.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Habbex [2010-04-27 19:36:46 +0000 UTC]
Haha cute and awesome ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RORSTER [2010-04-27 16:54:41 +0000 UTC]
Another fun-to-view great work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>