HOME | DD

Aeires In reply to datagram [2004-11-23 19:22:57 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. I have a few that do that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aeires In reply to TomWilcox [2004-11-09 04:57:59 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, Tom. I knew I wanted an off center position for this one. The two long flares coming out the bottom led me to a vertical piece on this one. The large flares are polar, so it was a bit tricky, but I finally got them to behave.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomWilcox In reply to Aeires [2004-11-09 11:21:55 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, it's very cool.

Tom

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aeires In reply to Darkangel764 [2004-11-08 05:45:22 +0000 UTC]

Thank you. Yeah, it's good to keep it simple sometimes. Whenever someone asks me for help, I always tell them less is more in apo.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aeires In reply to deloulark [2004-11-08 05:48:02 +0000 UTC]

Thank you. I worked this one for a while, but stopped at this point because the way the rays shot outward. Seemed to give it more energy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aeires In reply to Xeyda [2004-11-06 22:49:23 +0000 UTC]

Hey thanks. Don't worry, I'm a week behind on deviations myself, and that's after cleaning out over a hundred yesterday.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aeires In reply to littledeviltoo [2004-11-06 17:15:10 +0000 UTC]

Thank you. I've had images with lines that stretched out, but I've never done one were they were so long from the center before. I'd really like to print this one, but the zoom in was murder for such a simple image. Maybe one of these days when I'm going on vacation I'll let the system run for three days.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aeires In reply to trinity-77 [2004-11-06 01:47:38 +0000 UTC]

Thank you. I've been neglecting apophysis for too long, so I made this and Knitting to get caught back up.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trinity-77 In reply to Aeires [2004-11-08 06:56:42 +0000 UTC]

i've neglected apo for awhile myself. sometimes i think you need a break. i was afraid my stuff was all looking the same.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aeires In reply to Casperium [2004-11-06 02:02:14 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. Your Mite is a really interesting image.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aeires In reply to darthmarlan [2004-11-06 02:07:45 +0000 UTC]

Thank you. I was feeling in a simple mood that day.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

darthmarlan In reply to Aeires [2004-11-06 04:26:13 +0000 UTC]

Ah, yep, that's alright, and you're welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aeires In reply to korpus [2004-11-06 02:11:24 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. If the zoom in wasn't so harsh I probably would have rendered this one for print.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aeires In reply to SudoKai [2004-11-06 02:12:12 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. Wow, you think so? Spent so much time in UF I kinda started missing apo (the program )

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SudoKai In reply to Aeires [2004-11-06 02:13:15 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Aeires In reply to SudoKai [2004-11-06 02:14:28 +0000 UTC]

I'm so bad.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aeires In reply to gadgetgirl16 [2004-11-05 04:47:12 +0000 UTC]

Thank you. I was going for a star with the rays of slight shooting out. The spiral was just extra credit.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aeires In reply to ragusprime [2004-11-05 04:48:08 +0000 UTC]

Hey, I never thought of that. Thanks for the great comment. I might have to make my own star of Bethlehem for the upcoming season. Making a bright white/blue star shouldn't be that difficult.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ragusprime In reply to Aeires [2004-11-05 05:34:46 +0000 UTC]

Your very welcome cant wait to see the purpose made star

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aeires In reply to MisticAngel [2004-11-04 23:44:46 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. You know me, if I can chisel out some time, I'm going to play around with fractals.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aeires In reply to Aquiel [2004-11-04 23:33:06 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. I was playing around with one of the most difficult variations in the software when I made this one. It's not overly complicated, but I'm thinking about doing a minimalist wallpaper out of this. Don't know why I didn't think of that when I was making it. Must have gotten caught up in the long vertical strands that come down from the heart of it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Aquiel In reply to Aeires [2004-11-05 00:06:03 +0000 UTC]

Im kind of new to this type of art. I dont have any reference for it. All I know is that I find it aesthetically pleasing and to me it has a kind of cosmic ambiance. I had a massive cognition the other week, I was playing in photo shop with a photo and I realised how much "math" was in the photo. Then I realised that EVERYTHING comes down to maths This art that you do has some kind of formula to it, even if its just in the software... Sorry, Im in a ranty mood


Have you ever seen the art work of Alex Grey? I think his website is [link] Its well worth a look.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Aeires In reply to Aquiel [2004-11-05 00:13:01 +0000 UTC]

Fractals are all about math. They are comprised of complicated math formulas that combine to create the image. Thank God programmerss have done all the math work because I really don't like math much. I tell people the only math I like is fractals.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aeires In reply to Eynowd [2004-11-04 23:35:19 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. This was one of those rare ones that didn't need a lot of color modifications. I was really happy the way the rays change color as they shift away from the heart.

I don't know why, but it seems like a lot of mine have that flapping wings movement when scrolled. Must be some kind of stealth style developing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aeires In reply to jrsaldana [2004-11-04 23:35:54 +0000 UTC]

Well, it's not too extremely difficult. Do you have Apophysis?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jrsaldana In reply to Aeires [2004-11-05 02:13:18 +0000 UTC]

yes I do...your renders are superb my friend

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aeires In reply to chilledsashel [2004-11-04 23:37:03 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. I seem to stumble on the ones that have movement when scrolled. It's not deliberate, but I'll take them none the less.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aeires In reply to thxprincess [2004-11-04 23:40:37 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. It's a great program if the time is devoted to it. Very popular also because it's free. [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aeires In reply to KPEKEP [2004-11-04 23:41:10 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. Kinda getting back to the type of apophysis images I like to make the most.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0