Comments: 64
Aeires In reply to ??? [2004-10-14 23:09:33 +0000 UTC]
Thanks. This didn't look nearly as good with a black background, so giving it that paper feel worked.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Casperium [2004-10-06 23:06:18 +0000 UTC]
WOW,,,, I cant believe that is pure Apo..WOW..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sya [2004-10-06 13:40:28 +0000 UTC]
Woah, cool! Looks like crumpled pieces of sheer fabric arranged perfectly.... awesome!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thelma1 [2004-10-06 13:19:25 +0000 UTC]
Such beauty in simplicity. Just wonderful !!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Aeires In reply to Thelma1 [2004-10-07 00:43:48 +0000 UTC]
Thank you. I'm still debating making another color for the minimalist wallpaper gallery.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Xeyda [2004-10-06 08:32:17 +0000 UTC]
This is just...
I'll have to come back once I've had time think about it- but VERY freaking cool!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dusky-Hawk [2004-10-06 03:33:19 +0000 UTC]
Echo...echo... That is what this piece reminds me of. Very minimalistic in a good way. I like how this fractal has that icey kind of wintery feel to it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Eynowd [2004-10-05 23:00:44 +0000 UTC]
Man, you've done it again. I have no idea how you get such interesting work out of Apophysis. Great work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Eynowd In reply to Aeires [2004-10-06 04:20:25 +0000 UTC]
I've played with the triangles, but I still don't understand how their size and placement affects the image. I find that one of the most frustrating things about Apophysis - there seems to be little rhyme nor reason to why things turn out the way things do.
At least with POVRay, it's much easier to tweak little bits of the image while leaving the rest of it intact. That might be one reason why I've started preferring POVRay over Apophysis.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Aeires In reply to Eynowd [2004-10-06 04:25:07 +0000 UTC]
It's best to set your parameters to 3 triangles max. Less is usually more. Triangle 1 and 2 are the base triangles. They make up the bulk of the image. Triangle 3 is usually the mirror triangle. Moving it around makes multiple images that fade away into the background.
Just like triangles, less variations are usually better. Setting them to 2 or 3 gives you better blends, as each triangle is weighted for the variations in random amounts. Too many variations, too mixed of the blending. All I do is start with triangle 1 and move it around seeing how it affects the image. I move on to 2 and 3, narrowing them all down to the best spot to give the best image.
There's other tricks like rotating or resizing triangles that I also do if I think the overall image needs that little nudge.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Eynowd In reply to Aeires [2004-10-06 04:28:40 +0000 UTC]
I hear what you're saying, but there still doesn't seem to be any reason why certain placements do things (that I can grok). Maybe you've got a better feel for it than I do.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Aeires In reply to Eynowd [2004-10-06 04:36:47 +0000 UTC]
A lot of what I know is all based on theories from what I've noticed (there is no instruction manual to the thing). What I've noticed is each triangle is weighted to the variations (look under the variations tab in the editor to find out how and how much). The base triangle, that one that can't be moved but is a launching pad for all added triangles, affects how the image changes as the other triangles move closer or further away from it, as if each triangles weigthing is coming into play. Each file has a sweet spot, that when a triangle is moved over it, the image opens up and the variations meld together better.
Apophysis takes a lot of patience to get all the patterns and nuances down. I have hundreds of hours in it, so I've seen a lot and can predict how images will change fairly well. I can go through the gallery and spot who works with it on deep levels, and who just brush the surface without trying, just by looking at what type of images have been made. If you want to get back into it, I can give you help, but from what I've seen of your POVray images, that looks like a great way to go also. It's all an individual thing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Deborah-Valentine [2004-10-05 21:44:18 +0000 UTC]
very "modern art"! an unique use of the program!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
GossamerWings [2004-10-05 20:33:16 +0000 UTC]
Looks like a sketch. This is quite different than what I'm used to seeing, but I do like it. I'm not sure however on whether squares or rectangles...can I choose both? ^_^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>