HOME | DD
AkubakaArts β Fallen
by-nc-nd
#arkham #batman #dark #dc #dccomics #fanart #jasontodd #robin #jasontoddrobin #arkhamknight #dccomicsfanart
Published: 2017-07-26 18:32:23 +0000 UTC; Views: 110558; Favourites: 4999; Downloads: 121
Redirect to original
Description
Jason ToddHe was an Angel for me. With wonderful black wings. But Joker destroyed his wings and took his life.
The story of second Robin Jason Todd is the most painful story for me. Now Jason is my favourite character right after Batman.
Art mostly based on game Batman: Arkham Knight, where i saw Jason in the first time. And i saw how Joker tortured him to death.
Amazing game.
But this art is breaking my heart.
Also character belongs to DC, not to me :c
PS: Guys, i need help! Should i put censure to this picture as for violence/gore???????
I don't want to hide it, but if i must, i'll do it.
Related content
Comments: 251
π: 1 β©: 0
π: 1 β©: 0
π: 1 β©: 0
π: 1 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 2 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 1 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 0 β©: 0
π: 2 β©: 1
π: 1 β©: 0
I don't think this needs to be censored. It's so mild in blood I can't see someone getting upset with it. I feel only "gore" work should be censored if it's something nasty like guts exposed or someone getting stabbed. There is an amazing story behind this image, don't censor it. But hey, that's just my opinion. I'm pretty open to most things Β―\_(γ)_/Β―
π: 2 β©: 0
Don't hide it! NO it would lose it's meaning if you censored it!! Otherwise it's just not....I mean it loses the emotion too you know?!
Edit: Honestly it's not THAT gorey, there's a bit of blood and the wings are broken, now if his heart was ripped out and a lot of other gorey details and such then maybe but it's fine as is in my opinion.
π: 0 β©: 0
Fantastic job! Love Jason!
I think you're okay not censoring this. It's not all that gory, really.
π: 0 β©: 0
Omg he looks SO AMAZING! you are extremaly talented, those textures... everything, concept... and the Robin - his look, eyes, it's so damn hot... I wish you made another one...
π: 0 β©: 0
Man I love Jason so much!! He doesnβt deserve this!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
Thank you so much!!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
He actually stood up to Mongul, king of WarWorld, and OUTSMARTED him! He saved Superman from the prison of a false paradise! Toddβs finest moment...Yet, who but an old timer like me remembers? In the Justice League animated series, they gave that role to Wonder Women instead, pretending that there had been no Todd.
π: 0 β©: 0
No need to censor, in my opinion. Very well done!
π: 0 β©: 0
Maybye i'm alone in this, but i dont feel entirely sorry for Jason Todd...at least not the arkham version.
He went after Joker, Batmans Arch nemesis and most dangerous enemy alone. With no tracker, no communications, no way for batman to follow or be able to find him if anything went wrong (which it did) because he thought he could take on and kill the joker...only to fall into the trap Joker had set up because he wanted the kid to go after him...so he could do THAT to him.
He has no one to blame for becoming arkham knight but himself...and i think he realised that in the end when Bruce extended his hand.
I could have gone for a "My god what have i done?" moment after that scene in the mall where he snaps back to reality after realizing that Bruce didnt abandon him and thought he had lost him (like oracle told him)...and have him realize that he not only put the batfamily in danger with his insane revenge plot with Scarecrow...he willingly helped try to destroy Gotham and beyond with the cloudburst and Ace Chemicals.
However, the artwork you have done is pretty good. Showing a broken member of gothams gaurdian angels with the broken wings to show...having been dragged down into the pit of hellish psychos trying to destroy the city by the devil with the chesire grin.
Β
π: 0 β©: 0
Well now i am in tears ... all of your batman and robin stuff is so beautiful *ugly crying*Β Β Β Β
π: 0 β©: 0
OMG OMG! Thank you so much!!!!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
Help. He has fallen and I don't think he's going to get back up.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
It's gorgeous. About the gore question, not for me, but maybe violence would be required just in case they bann it... I don't know...
Love it!!
π: 0 β©: 0
So you know he comes back as Red Hood right, he doesn't stay dead.
π: 0 β©: 1
resurrected isn't exactly a happy ever after ending
π: 0 β©: 0
That description... SPOILERS MUCH?!
Just another reminder that I own both Arkham Asylum and Arkham Knight, and I just haven't gotten around to playing them... I guess that's my fault. Knowing that now, I can deduce where they got the 'Robin is dead' thing for the DC cinematic universe; yet more proof that Zack Snyder is just a sophomoric charlatan with a raging two-inch hard-on for making his movies like video games, and not in the good way that showcase the artistic capability and integrity of both mediums; in the 'make it as obnoxious as possible' way for no other reason than he thought it would "look cool," much in the same way Meghan McCarthy has Rainbow Dash overuse the line "so awesome," or Pinkie Pie exclaim "best [thing] ever," or make Twilight Sparkle have to relearn the value of friendship for the seventh damn time, because McCarthy and Snyder have both decided to stop making good things and instead become fucking hacks that only churn out shit.
Rant concluded, onto the picture itself, which is a stellar display of heinous tragedy: beautiful for absolutely all the wrong reasons. Every detail is crisp and striking, as they would be in what's referred to as a "flashbulb memory;" moments of overwhelming impact captured by the mind, immortalized in memory and every aspect of which is preserved perfectly for infinitude... even ones like these that those witnessing might wish they could forget. This has such a powerful portrayal of a corpse that in all likelihood hasn't even gone cold yet, but is having it's warmth stolen by the second; a cruel reminder of what once was alive and precious, now ruined, never to be fixed again. It summons such mighty emotions of grief, loss, guilt, anguish, and truculence of the 'absolutely going to murder a mother fucker' kind. Well done, with immense commendations to you.
Also, does Todd look like that in game, or was it your endeavor to make him look like Gerald Way, but with Elijah Wood's freakishly blue eyes?
Speaking of the lead singer of the former My Chemical Romance (still can't believe they broke up...) here is some relevant listening material: 'The Ghost Of You '. I won't apologize for the goosebumps or the chills down your spine you'll get from listening to that.
π: 0 β©: 2
I just now learned you own the Batman: Arkham video games.Β Honestly, Arkham Knight's not exactly my favorite as a narrative.
But some of Scarecrow's lines in Knight are what I wish were uttered by at least one of Meghan McCarthy's villains.Β Including the non-existent one from TCE.
Also, you should see Batman's remote hacking device in the same game.Β After I did AND read Bronyalchemist's first draft of his Equestria Girls what-if, I came up with the idea of an antagonist (even going as far as to include human Sunset Shimmer) using a remote tablet or smart-phone with a hacking app to drive vehicles remotely (which, fun fact, Batman can do with the Batmobile in Arkham Knight); manipulate contraptions to their advantage (also in Arkham Knight); shut off the lighting in a school to slip through guards OR the Mane cast; trigger alarms to create diversions/avoid being heard when trouncing foes single-handedly; etc.
π: 0 β©: 1
Sorry for the delay in reply. Was busy moving, then was recently sick as all Hell, and been depressed in between.
I've heard Arkham Knight is The Dark Knight Rises of the Arkham games, as in it's by far the weakest of the trilogy. (Not counting Origins. That doesn't count.)
I remember reading Al's first draft a long time ago. Looking back at it now, as valiant as it is, I think it's trying to do something that can't be done; fix Equestria Girls. Not to say that his summary was bad, far from it, but in the core of the very concept of EQ is an intrinsic trait that cannot be removed no matter how the idea is doctored or presented, and that is the whole fucking spinoff is built on the foundation of taking characters from one franchise, and then forcing them into an environment and physical forms that they were never created to occupy, as arbitrarily dictated by aloof and arrogant executives with as little or less creative prowess or integrity than the incorrigible fucking hack than they hired to write their diarrhea shitbomb fan fiction tier 'ponies in high school' cash-grab/attempt to steal the success of Monster High.
In fact, I now regret not collecting the contents of my toilet bowl over the last three days and then trying to sell it to Hasbro as the script for the next Equestria Girls film.
Consider this; for all the thought Al put into the idea of a techno-magic high school to serve as the foundation for an entire syndicated series, how much harder would it be to create wholly original characters designed to exist in that world, as opposed to retooling every single character from a completely different series in an attempt to rationalize (poorly, by the way) their presence in that world? For that matter, which approach do you think has more longevity? Exactly.
For as insipid, vapid, offensively puerile, and cringy as Monster High is (just the sketch from Robot Chicken where the school gets destroyed by the Crypt Keeper left me feeling nauseous), I'll at least give this; it's success was not due to it being a spin-off of Barbie or the fucking Bratz dolls...Β its success and in fact its fucking impetuous came from its creators smashing together the aesthetics of what tweenage wannabe edge-ladies were buying at Hot Topic. Fucking seriously. Whereas when Faust and her creative team built the world of Equestria, they did so with an artistic spark and author's integrity. They thought through things such as, 'what's this world like, how does it operate, who lives here?' and most importantly, 'why should people care?' And that's the primary creative difference between MLP and MH; while both were corporately funded to sell products, Faust and friends created MLP with a soul: the Sander brothers created a soulless product. EQ tries to copy MH by itself being a soulless product, and no amount of retooling, reworking, or re-imaging, however well thought out or well intentioned, can ever change that.
If you're want something with a life of it's own, make something with a life of it's own; otherwise, you're trying to force a unique spirit into the lifeless husk, and all you'll get is an abomination. You'd have more success breeding goldfish to survive in the Pacific Ocean.
PS: There was a villain in 'The Crystal Empire'?
π: 0 β©: 0
Okay so I completely agree with your praise of the artwork, but your criticism of Zack Snyder is unjust. You said "I can deduce where they got the 'Robin is dead' thing for the DC cinematic universe" and "Zack Snyder is just a sophomoric charlatan with a raging two-inch hard-on for making his movies like video games" but that simply isn't true.
Jason Todd aka Robin II was killed by the Joker in the COMICS back in 1988, returning decades later as a villain/antihero under the moniker of Red Hood. InΒ fact, this is an INCREDIBLY famous comic storyline and character, so I'm slightly surprised you didn't know. The Arkham games simply adapted this storyline for their game, it's not an original idea by Rocksteady.
I can tell youΒ don't read the comics, so I wouldΒ recommend the animated movie Under the Red Hood, it's a masterpiece thatΒ perfectly portrays this character's storyline. Although I agree that the DCEU isΒ horseshit and that Zack SnyderΒ probably has a lot to do with that, don't harbor any illusions that he's simply copying a video game for ideas, he isn't that dense. He's basing his (admittedly flawed, messy, and awful) storylines off of the actual source material, the comics.
Just to be clear, I don't intend to undermine or insult you, I'm just clearing up a slight misconception on your part. Have a nice day
π: 0 β©: 2
| Next =>