Comments: 23
MinionOfKetchup [2004-12-21 08:15:09 +0000 UTC]
I think the left foot is turned in a little too much...but if I were you I wouldn't take advice from me. I am, possibly, a 7 on a scale of 1-23 of good criticism. Did that even make any sense? (Implode.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mangolious-kiwi [2004-12-20 05:34:40 +0000 UTC]
I like the pose of hte figure and the shading's wonderful. I agree withthe left foot looking a tad bit too wide, the drawing still looks great though! ^_^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kirayasha [2004-12-18 01:55:14 +0000 UTC]
A+!! I see someone's going to ace her art final!!
As fro a name...what about Mr Nicetush? *scrolls upwards to ogle him some more*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
asteraascended [2004-12-17 18:56:21 +0000 UTC]
Boy I'm having trouble picking which of your figures I want to fav. ^_^
One thing I did want to comment on with this one was that left foot. As I have seen in your other drawings, generally your feet are really amazing, and that one here just strikes me as off for some reason. This gesture is really wonderful through the lower body, but something in the upper body just looks off to me. I think it's the placement of the left shoulder though I could have to see the image to really say. I am going to guess from the pose that this is done from an image and not a model just cause it would be really hard to hold. lol But still, the tonal work is beautiful and I am really fond of the lower back area.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
asteraascended In reply to alesyira [2004-12-17 23:30:24 +0000 UTC]
All right, now let me look and see.
It must be strange working from the computer screen, heh. Well one thing I notice about the arm now it that in your drawing it is picking up more light than it seems to be in the photograph. Since the body is turned from us a little that arm is a bit more back in space and the shadow that runs along the back continues onto the arm. There are high points of light on the arm but in relation to the high points of light on the upperback/nexk area for example, they are not as strong.
The foot issue is more apparent now as well. The foot is just a TAD too wide compared to the ankle I think. Its enough to make the foot noticeably appear odd in perspective of how we see the leg turned. Also, I think the tone of the inside of the leg running up the calf could be more consistent. Having the heel be very light against the other section of the foot would really make it pop.
Be careful not to push your reflected light to rivaling your direct light.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
alesyira In reply to gokuyert [2004-12-19 08:55:05 +0000 UTC]
lol, true true, this guy has been in some of the WEIRDEST poses this semester.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Urd-chan [2004-12-17 12:11:12 +0000 UTC]
Very unusual pose... Amazing job on the art, though. Your ability with shading never ceases to amaze me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
megaminokamo [2004-12-17 08:35:03 +0000 UTC]
"Where did THAT come from?" or "Whoooooaaa... I don't have an arm... COOL!"
I dunno, something dumb like that. XD;;;
👍: 0 ⏩: 1