HOME | DD

amandahawkins71 — Swap Thing

#tg #caption
Published: 2018-07-06 08:51:31 +0000 UTC; Views: 17604; Favourites: 103; Downloads: 113
Redirect to original
Description

Family drama during a massive bodyswap event...


amandasreadingroom.wordpress.c…

Related content
Comments: 15

charleeshultz [2021-04-14 21:45:13 +0000 UTC]

It body swapping really could happen i would want to be a teenage girl instead

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

charlee718 [2018-10-26 06:59:34 +0000 UTC]

Sounds like fun to me to bad body shaping don't realy happen

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rican11 [2018-07-10 04:30:11 +0000 UTC]

A great cap, as usual Amanda, and also, food for thought.

Would a bodyswap with your own attractive mother really be so bad, especially when you have a step-father? Admitting his previous crossdressing misdemeanours must be so cathartic, and having totally free access to a whole new wardrobe would be like a kid being let loose in a sweetshop.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

amandahawkins71 In reply to rican11 [2018-07-10 07:33:41 +0000 UTC]

You could be right. I think it would depend on how much the son already identified with his mother. Not all cross-dressers would identify that closely, to the point of subsuming their own identity in hers, but stranger things have (allegedly) happened.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

p-l-richards [2018-07-07 20:50:05 +0000 UTC]

I think this world has to be referred to as the 'Little Shift', doesn't it? I agree there are problems with the Great Shift (danger of chaos and the collapse of civilization, as you mention), but I don't think being too large a concept for captioning is one of them. You trust your readers to be familiar with the idea, so a lot of exposition is not necessary. As with any trope, it's how your caption slots into it.

Your theme is more original, so you need more exposition. Do you bring it off? I think you do.  Explanatory parts are seamlessly welded into another very good caption  And we will all love the appearance of your 'signatory cliche': Mom in son's body gets a stiffy when she sees a girl with - beautiful hair   

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

amandahawkins71 In reply to p-l-richards [2018-07-08 08:37:23 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, PL. I like the term "Little Shift". Not-So-Great Shift kind of appeals to me as well.


I know that the "shared world" concept can be useful as a writing shorthand, but I seem to value originality (at least a veneer of it) more than saving wordage. If I'm checking out a caption and I see the words "Great Shift", my first thought is, "God, not another one? Talk about lame!" And I stop reading. That's partly because I assume the rest of the caption isn't likely to be much different than a pile of others I've read, and I've probably already read too many TG captions. Ah well. Such is life. Back to work.   

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

p-l-richards In reply to amandahawkins71 [2018-07-10 20:09:19 +0000 UTC]

Ah, originality! We all seek it, but it is so difficult to achieve. Is there anything that hasn't, in some sense, been done before? But as well as originality of theme, you can have originality in treatment of a theme, even in treatment of a cliche. Alexander Pope said that 'True Wit' consisted in "What oft was thought, but ne'er so well expressed". (Sorry - switches off his pretentious mode  ) 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

amandahawkins71 In reply to p-l-richards [2018-07-11 01:15:37 +0000 UTC]

True, much has been done before. Also true: writers steal from other writers, and from everyone and everywhere else as well. What matters is what one does with the material. There are two ways to improve on (or at least alter) the original source(s): (1) update the idea to adjust to changes in society, (2) mix in aspects of one's own personality. I like to think I do both of those things, even when starting with an idea that's already been done to death. (Or almost-but-not-quite dead. To quote the Pythons: "I'm not dead yet!" Whack!)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aumih16 [2018-07-07 16:30:33 +0000 UTC]

love it! 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MellissaLynn [2018-07-06 14:43:29 +0000 UTC]

Nice, Amanda!  Great piece here... 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

amandahawkins71 In reply to MellissaLynn [2018-07-07 00:36:13 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, Mellissa. That pic had to hang around for quite awhile before I figured out what it was trying to tell me. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

typewriter17 [2018-07-06 08:57:31 +0000 UTC]

Heh Heh Heh....  You do come up with the dangedest ideas.  And some good pics to go with them.  Excellent stuff.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

amandahawkins71 In reply to typewriter17 [2018-07-07 00:35:00 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. Actually, for captions, the pics come first. I've got a ton of 'em saved, and now and then one rises out of the pack and suggests that it has a tale to tell. For longer works the story idea comes first, and then I trawl through my archives to see what pics might help illustrate it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

typewriter17 In reply to amandahawkins71 [2018-07-07 10:21:32 +0000 UTC]

Which way is more fun?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

amandahawkins71 In reply to typewriter17 [2018-07-08 08:29:59 +0000 UTC]

Caps are probably more fun. They're sort of like a cheap, but short-lived high. Writing long-form is certainly more work and far more demanding (a lot more things to go wrong), but it's also much more satisfying in the long run.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0