HOME | DD

AntFingers β€” Skull Crawler

#animal #kaiju #kingkong #pterosaur #hyrotrioskjan #kongskullisland #skullcrawler #skullislandcreatures #specchallenge
Published: 2017-03-14 01:06:23 +0000 UTC; Views: 2614; Favourites: 72; Downloads: 3
Redirect to original
Description Huge, flightless azhdarchid pterosaur. Apex predator of skull island, descended from estuarine, fish-eating,Β amphibious pterosaurs. Primary digit (wing finger) has developed into a flipper-like callousedΒ  pad for easy locomotion over rough terrain. Made for Hyrotrioskjans #SpecChallenge . Sorry for the crease in the upper left, it got bent.
Related content
Comments: 48

Zimzilla99 [2017-03-14 21:30:14 +0000 UTC]

ok squad *fires grenade launcher* lets go home boys

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Lediblock2 In reply to Zimzilla99 [2017-03-17 22:46:58 +0000 UTC]

Congrats. You killed one. Now you've pissed off all its friends.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Zimzilla99 In reply to Lediblock2 [2017-03-17 23:43:01 +0000 UTC]

Tactical air strike

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Lediblock2 In reply to Zimzilla99 [2017-03-18 17:17:37 +0000 UTC]

They tried that in the movie. It didn't work that well.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Zimzilla99 In reply to Lediblock2 [2017-03-18 17:22:43 +0000 UTC]

actually that's not an air strike as you need to use planes or drones in said assault please don't try to debate me on military ordinance or weapon potency that you clearly have no knowledge of

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Lediblock2 In reply to Zimzilla99 [2017-03-19 21:22:42 +0000 UTC]

Oh, just like you try to debate on basic fucking logic in monster movies?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Zimzilla99 In reply to Lediblock2 [2017-03-19 21:54:27 +0000 UTC]

O trust me when it comes to monster movieΒ knowledge id cuck the hell out of you

If it can evolve on this planet it can be killed
If it can be killed by a couple of conventional weapons i.e. a few missiles or machine gunsΒ then it is not a monster to me.

so as a heads up if you are making a spec evo creature its not a monster its just an animal that depending on the creativity of the artist can be scary but still not an actual monster


so creatures like king kong (the original and 2005 version), mostΒ old b movie "monsters" are just over grownΒ animals in most cases.


watch something like ultraman, gamera , or Godzilla (besides 1998) those are monsters
Cause I can name dozens of monsters that cant be killed by conventional weapons

also I sense hostility

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Lediblock2 In reply to Zimzilla99 [2017-03-19 23:52:07 +0000 UTC]

"also I sense hostility"

You come into my corner of the Internet, sowing your filth through my fandom... and you dare to claim yourself superior to me, show surprise when I fight back?!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Zimzilla99 In reply to Lediblock2 [2017-03-19 23:56:41 +0000 UTC]

What are you like 5 " dare to claim yourself superior to me"

Also we aren't in an kind of violent physical altercation we aren't fighting.
- you don't own a fandom so its not yours
- you don't own the internet so you don't have a corner of it

I will admit good choice of word use in that sowing bit, also filth hmm want proof to justify that definition

Also apparently you cant read sarcasm


also I don't know why you'd fave someone your apparently fighting

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Lediblock2 In reply to Zimzilla99 [2017-03-20 19:49:52 +0000 UTC]

"- you don't own a fandom so its not yours"

Then why are you acting like you are bringing in this huge earth-shattering relevation, as if you're some grand fucking prophet?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Zimzilla99 In reply to Lediblock2 [2017-03-20 20:02:42 +0000 UTC]

because there is something called the first amendment your the only one calling me a prophet but if I do recall myΒ  old theology class I took I do believe Nathan was a prophet so I guess you have the two of us confused

and as stated you don't own a fandom so its not yours as previously stated

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Lediblock2 In reply to Zimzilla99 [2017-03-25 01:09:05 +0000 UTC]

...You are actually too dense to insult. Holy shit, I never thought this was possible.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Zimzilla99 In reply to Lediblock2 [2017-03-25 01:11:50 +0000 UTC]

And your acting like a child, I frankly don't care what you think and if so your shouldn't care what I think so really good job and cry somewhere else

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Lediblock2 In reply to Zimzilla99 [2017-03-25 01:18:49 +0000 UTC]

Said the one who's trying to go all gung-ho, hoo rah in monster movies.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Zimzilla99 In reply to Lediblock2 [2017-03-25 01:28:30 +0000 UTC]

We aren't in a movie, also you are the one who responded to my comment so yay says the one who is complaining. I'm sitting here eating this up cause I don't care enough.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Dontknowwhattodraw94 [2017-03-14 21:16:22 +0000 UTC]

As if Azhdarchids weren't scary enough yet...
Awesome kaiju pterosaur! And it doesn't even look like Rodan

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AntFingers In reply to Dontknowwhattodraw94 [2017-03-15 06:09:08 +0000 UTC]

Glad to hear it, especially from you! Yours is probably more plausible than mine, but then again... I think Plastospleen made a descendant of the tully monster Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Dontknowwhattodraw94 In reply to AntFingers [2017-03-15 09:10:14 +0000 UTC]

You went for a true kaiju so you're more free when it comes to the speculative part.Β 
Yeah, PLASTOSPLEEN's one is a really nice one. Probably the most original idea.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AntFingers In reply to Dontknowwhattodraw94 [2017-03-16 06:54:39 +0000 UTC]

Probably? I think you mean undoubtedly, I mean... It walks on its eyes for Christ sake! I did go for a kaiju design, I didn't want it too big, so I kept it under the extremes of many dinosaurs.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Dontknowwhattodraw94 In reply to AntFingers [2017-03-16 12:46:25 +0000 UTC]

Well, you never know if somebody comes up with something even better xD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AntFingers In reply to Dontknowwhattodraw94 [2017-03-17 05:47:29 +0000 UTC]

I just saw DT's, I have no idea what it is, but I love it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Dontknowwhattodraw94 In reply to AntFingers [2017-03-18 15:59:58 +0000 UTC]

His one is a really nice entry.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AntFingers In reply to Dontknowwhattodraw94 [2017-03-19 01:54:52 +0000 UTC]

Indeed.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Luca9108 [2017-03-14 12:44:27 +0000 UTC]

I like the small rest of the legs near the tail.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AntFingers In reply to Luca9108 [2017-03-15 06:09:49 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, I was thinking whether I should've put them there or not, I decided I should've, seeing as they're just vestigial detail.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Hyrotrioskjan [2017-03-14 03:50:00 +0000 UTC]

In case you have a simple graphic program: you can get rid of that crease!Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AntFingers In reply to Hyrotrioskjan [2017-03-14 04:40:03 +0000 UTC]

I don't really think people would've noticed, had I not pointed it out Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Hyrotrioskjan [2017-03-14 03:49:08 +0000 UTC]

Oh, damn, cool idea!Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AntFingers In reply to Hyrotrioskjan [2017-03-14 04:40:27 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, glad you like it. Apparently I wasn't the only one planning on doing Azhdarchids.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Dinosaurlover83 [2017-03-14 02:49:04 +0000 UTC]

Nice one!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AntFingers In reply to Dinosaurlover83 [2017-03-14 03:16:59 +0000 UTC]

Thanks heaps!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Dinosaurlover83 In reply to AntFingers [2017-03-14 03:18:47 +0000 UTC]

welcome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TrilobiteCannibal [2017-03-14 02:11:37 +0000 UTC]

Well, there goes my other idea...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AntFingers In reply to TrilobiteCannibal [2017-03-14 02:16:04 +0000 UTC]

Hehe, I couldn't resist the skull-beak design, sorry.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TrilobiteCannibal In reply to AntFingers [2017-03-14 02:17:02 +0000 UTC]

Time to go with the more obvious one..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AntFingers In reply to TrilobiteCannibal [2017-03-14 03:17:55 +0000 UTC]

Crocodilian?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TrilobiteCannibal In reply to AntFingers [2017-03-14 13:13:15 +0000 UTC]

Large, underground reptile with limited limb count...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AntFingers In reply to TrilobiteCannibal [2017-03-15 06:04:07 +0000 UTC]

I'm curious as to know what type of reptile...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TrilobiteCannibal In reply to AntFingers [2017-03-18 00:44:49 +0000 UTC]


Bipes

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AntFingers In reply to TrilobiteCannibal [2017-03-18 07:43:49 +0000 UTC]

I think everyone's first thought was amphibaeneans.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TrilobiteCannibal In reply to AntFingers [2017-03-19 05:37:34 +0000 UTC]

exactly, it's very obvious
though I just had an idea....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AntFingers In reply to TrilobiteCannibal [2017-03-20 05:56:10 +0000 UTC]

Don't tell me, I wanna see it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TrilobiteCannibal In reply to AntFingers [2017-03-28 05:13:42 +0000 UTC]

Never mind I give up, I was gonna do a turtle

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AntFingers In reply to TrilobiteCannibal [2017-03-28 05:40:18 +0000 UTC]

Paleop beat you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TrilobiteCannibal In reply to AntFingers [2017-03-29 23:53:14 +0000 UTC]

Yup, I give up

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheDerpasaur [2017-03-14 01:24:12 +0000 UTC]

Awesome!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

AntFingers In reply to TheDerpasaur [2017-03-14 02:15:49 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TheDerpasaur In reply to AntFingers [2017-03-15 00:42:58 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0