HOME | DD
Arabesque91 — The Wright Anything Agency
Published: 2013-12-15 01:26:27 +0000 UTC; Views: 11592; Favourites: 295; Downloads: 33
Redirect to original
Description
Just finished Dual Destinies this week (DLC included) so mini-review time: I thought the story and new characters were all great and the animated cutscenes were a great addition. But I also thought most of the cases were too simple compared to the previous games and missed the forensics sequences so, for me, it goes 1>4>3>5>2
Also, if you haven't got the DLC case yet, do it. It's probably my favourite case of the game.
(Characters belong to the Ace Attorney franchise)
Related content
Comments: 34
Dual Destinies was a good game. I liked it a lot.
(can't wait for Spirit of Justice to come out)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Great picture! I love how it has your own unique style.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SO CUTE! Just wondering, but what is trucy standing on?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thanks
She's kneeling on a chair which you can kinda see between Apollo and Phoenix (I moved Apollo in closer so it became less clear)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OH That makes sense I can see it it just confused me at first because the chair is almost the same color as her dress~
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
The characters' heads are just a little too small in proportion to their bodies, but that aside, this is a really well-drawn picture. Well done.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
You know..^^
It's funny when you are criticizing this art when you are no better than him.
In fact, you only have 1 deviation. I truly think you should work on your anatomy practice
instead of criticizing others.
In my eyes this art is amazingly well done.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
I appreciate the thought but I don't think he was being rude. If people never spoke up to tell me when I've done something wrong, i'd never learn to improve.
As long as they're polite, I'm fine with some constructive criticism
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I'm not trying to be a jerk here, y'know. If I were trying to be unfair in criticizing, I wouldn't have not mentioned this at all being good. It IS good.
Okay, yes, I only have 1 deviation. And yes, it isn't good. And yes, I'm terrible at art. But that does not remove my right to offer constructive criticism.
If a friend of mine made me a batch of cookies, and forgot the sugar, and asks me to try them, am I not allowed to say they aren't sweet enough just because I've never made my own cookies before?
I'm allowed to offer constructive criticism to artwork, no matter how crappy my own artwork is. So think on this next time you decide that your opinion makes mine wrong.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
1. He never asked you if his cookies are sweet or not. He never asked you to critic his art.
2. You can't make constructive critique when YOU don't have enough knowledge in art. Therefore, it will be nothing but a pointless comment. I am also saying this for your sake. You will only embarrass yourself if you continue like this.
Come on, reply back with stronger argument.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I have EVERY right to offer constructive criticism. As a user on DeviantArt, I am a fully active member of this community, with the right to offer my opinion. When Arabesque91 posted the artwork here on DA, she was therefore allowing herself TO be criticized. If she didn't want criticism, she would've closed the comments. She has the full ability to do so, yet she leaves them open. For criticism.
If the user didn't want to receive ANY judgement for their artwork, they would have closed off the comments. And more importantly, if Arabesque didn't want criticism, they wouldn't have given a positive reply back agreeing with my criticism and saying their own words.
Just saying, you're the only one getting mad about legitimate judgement.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
^^ lol
1. I never said you have no right to do it. I said you "can't" meaning you do not have enough ability to do so. Read the comment again before you get too excited there.
2. Arabesque is a male.^^ not a she
3. He us just saying to make you feel better.
You want me to send some proper anatomy links for ya?
now come back for more please
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Okay, look, you may not be able to tell, but you're being a jerk about this. I'm more than allowed to offer my two cents about I think of artwork. I "can" and I "will". And nothing you can say will change that.
Look, proper anatomy is one thing, but I was referring to the artstyle of the actual Ace Attorney games, where the heads in the picture are noticeably disproportional to the heads in the games. It may "be" right, but it doesn't "look" right.
I should also add that he agreed that the heads were too small. Yes, Arabesque himself agreed that the heads were too small.
I'm sorry, where's your argument here?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
With "that" skill you have? I told you you are embarrassing yourself.
1. You should have added that to your comment when you criticized his work.
2. I'm sorry, say that again one more time. Say that the art style of ace attorney has ddisproportionate to the heads. Say that one more time. Pff XD
here is the link of origina and official l artwork of ace attorney :
www.creativeuncut.com/gallery-…
Pff they have realistic body shape. See? You proved yourself that you do not enough skill to critic others.
Therefore, it also "looks" right too.
Now, I really should ask you study art before reply back
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Buddy, my "skill" has nothing to do with anything. Food critics don't necessarily know how to cook, movie critics don't make their own movies, and I can't draw. Big freaking whoop.
Yes, I see your point. I did misword my point and for that I'm sorry. The heads are disproportional to the bodies actually in the artwork. The characters have a bit of a chubbiness to them that isn't matched by the heads in the final product.
Stop embarrassing yourself and let me have an opinion. And stop being such an ass. My art sucks, I get it. No need to rub it in.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I am embarrassing myself. ..?
I am trying to stop you from embarrassing yourself, boy.
1. Food does not count since you do not need skill to say if the food is tasty or not.
Do you need skill to figure out if which one is tastier between chocolate and vegetables? Furthermore, people do have different opinions in taste of food.
Therefore, this is completely off topic from the food subject.
2.for art, you need freaking skill to critic. did you know some people study only the face for 10 years? If you do not enough skill in art, how do you know if the art is wrong or not? ? Like told you food is different
3. Wow, then, you commented the whole body portion things, just for that tiny chubiness?
4. People have different art styles, you can critic the proper body shape if you have enough skill to do it. But if the artist did something off from original on purpose to make that into his art style, you are basically saying chocolates should always be the brown color, not any other color, because brown is the original.
5. Accept your apology and I apologize to for making a mess. But I do see a lot of people on DA critique art when they are no better. Most of them have worse skill than whom they are criticizing to. This annoys me a lot because most of their critique is incorrect.
6. I was only trying to give you suggestions. You will embarrass yourself if you continue like this. When people See your comment, they would expect you to be anamazing artist. Then, they visit your page. Boom, they make fun of you when the reality is different from their expectation.
7. If you don't want me to rub it in, stop commenting stuffs like that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
1. Art doesn't need equal skill to criticize. Can you rate whether or not a work of Pablo Picasso or the random scribblings of a literal five-year old is better without having the drawing hand of Leonardo da Vinci?
Furthermore, people do have different opinions in styles of art.
2. Never said the art was wrong. I said that, implied to be as I saw it, that the heads' proportions felt off compared to the bodies. Paraphrasing a bit but still.
3. Just as every second counts in comedy, so too does every detail count in art. If the pencil strokes a little too far to the left when drawing a smile, or there's a stray mark on the background, it makes every difference.
When drawing a character in a certain way, you must be willing to change every portion of the character to match the transition. Even the slightest change can require a complete makeover.
4. ... This point confuses me. Why am I allowed to judge the body here...?
5. I won't apologize for giving my opinion on something. The skill of my art is irrelecant because I'm able to analyze the drawing carefully and catch onto these things.
... I also add that I'm not wrong about the proportions of the head which thus means you've knocked yourself down. Once again, the artist himself said it was wrong.
6. Yes, because suggestions involve telling a person outright thay what they're doing is wrong, followed by doing the exact same thing themselves. "In my eyes, this pictures is perfect." Yes, I paraphrased, but that was exactly what you said right at the end of your first response.
7. Oh, right, I'm sorry for offerring rude and unfair judgement and being destructive in my criticism. I should-
Eh? I was just saying what I thought of the art with no intentions whatsoever of being mean based on legitimate analysis of the art itself?
... Then why am I apologizing?!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
1. What..? I was expecting you to wake up and be smart about this alright, I will teach you one more time. But remember I don't like teaching idiots. I am running out of patience here by your stupidity. Btw how does that relate to this situation? You can clearly figureout which one has better art skill unless you are blind. Does this amazing art looks like a 5 year old scribble to you? Different opinions of art STYLE, not the subject art, meaning the proper anatomy and stuffs.
2. Yes, you said that and you are wrong.why? Study art and ask your self.
3.are you sure you wanna say that when you have very limited art skill? If that was the problem, you should have sit back don't comment, because that was just his own art style although the anatomy is correct.
4. What you mean?
I said you are allow to critique about the body IF you have enough skill to do that.
5.well you just did apologize to me, which I believe making a mess like me. I never mentioned the apologies of giving opinions. How can you do analyze it when you don't have the skill for it huh? Would you explain it to me? How can a phone work without batteries? I am also repeating that he said that to make you feel better.
6. Perfect and amazing is a huge difference you know. You should have not mentioned that or you should have paraphrased better. I believe I am a terrible artist but I have at least more of art skill than you. I know better about the anatomy.
This work was really great in my eyes by matching it proper anatomy.
7. You do not have to apologize to me. Apologize yourself and your parents for making embarrassment for yourself. Like i told you, your standard of analysis is incorrect. You should feel sorry for commenting false judgements to the artist.
Opinion and critique is also different you know. It's OK to apologize so calm down and keep going. 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
... You know what? I'm done. I'm done discussing this. In your mind, only masters are allowed to criticize anything, and it's clear you won't open your mind. I'm making legitimate points and you respond by calling me an idiot. I said you were being mean but never once did I legitimately call you names.
This conversation is over. Don't respond, and don't ever reply to one of my posts on artwork ever again. Good day.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Stop making things up.
I never said stuffs like that. Masters can critique without embarrassing themselves
everyone can speak out their opinions without embarrassing themselves. However you don't want to critique instead of speaking out an opinion when you don not have enough skill. Like i told you opinions and criticizing are different.
is this clear? Stop making things up to make me look like a bad guy when I was only trying to help you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
... Help me? HELP me? I'm SO sorry for giving my two cents on artwork! DO FORGIVE ME for offering advice the author can use to learn. I DON'T KNOW WHAT I WAS THINKING when I thought that I should be allowed to put some LEGITIMATE ANALYSIS into what I thought of the art. I MUST HAVE BEEN CRAZY, TO THINK THAT JUST BECAUSE I CAN'T DRAW, DOESN'T FORBID ME FROM BEING ABLE TO ANALYZE ARTWORK. I -CLEARLY- LACK THE MENTAL CAPACITY.
Just shut up already. I don't care if you dislike non-professionals putting some thought into their opinions, don't push yourself where you don't belong. If I'm not being rude or destructive, I'm not doing anything wrong. Simple.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Of course you are not doing anything wrong except embarrassing yourself?
If you insist you want keep doing it, we'll don't blame me later. I tried to stop you.
apology accepted
I told you million times that opinions are criticizing are different. What you did was criticizing, not saying your opinion period.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Criticizing IS based on opinion. They are not inherently the same thing, but they are connected.
Plus, I don't see why I'm such a terrible person for offering constructive criticism.
And when you explain, try and come at me with a stronger argument than "Because you suck at drawing and are too stupid to think."
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
They are connected by this similarity:
-both expresses the "thinking" of oneself toward something
they are different are this:
- unlike some opinions like "I liked it, I hated it, I think it was sad." Critiquing is kind of judging by analysis of one.
The key word is the judge and analysis here. You don't wanna judge when you are no better and you can't analysis properly.
I never called you a terrible person, you are making things up again, dramatic much?
If you even can't break my so called "because you are such at drawing and you are too stupid to think" argument, I don't see why do I have to bring a stronger argument. That answer has given me 2 possibilities where you are at:
1. You can't break my argument because you can't debate well.
2. You can't break my argument because I am right.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Okay, I can analyze just fine. Just because I can't draw doesn't mean I don't have a keen eye for analyzing details. The ability to draw and the ability to critique through analysis are two different things.
You said I was an idiot, stupid, etc. Point is that you somehow think I'm committing a freaking sin.
Break it? I can't break an argument when the speaker refuses to let his points BE broken. You can't chop the last wooden plank when the holder is keeping his hand holding up the middle.
"... because I am right".
... You have to be trolling. You CAN'T be that self-centered. You can not be THAT self-righteous. I mean... wow. That was laughably vulgar right there. Claiming you're right does not the truth make, my friend.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You don't know anything because I'm pretty sure you never took art lesson. You need some decent skill to analyze. Why dont you try to explain how they are two different things? my statement is you need the same ability in order to draw or analysis. However, drawing needs more ability.
Calling you idiot or stupid does not mean you are committing a sin, seriously how do you interpret words? Btw just like a told you, you swore at me first. Calling me a jet and an ass. Ass is stronger word than idiot and stupid, just want to let you know.
be broken? Nope I am soo easy and relaxed by each points you make. If you read each comments, I always come up with something because my points are valid. You are the one who tried to give up first because you cannot beat me. You are not even close to break my argument that I almost feel bad for you. How does that this makes sense:"refuses to keep his points BE broken?" Boy, every argument can be broken and smashed if your points are valid and strong to get through. Is this really all you got? I'm bored already
yes..I definite am right. I am keep backing my statements up with reasons while you are blaming me about my statement? Self - centered? Say that to a judge.
you are the one who do not have enough reasons and explanations to break my argument and starts to breaking down. Don't you see?
i am not trolling, I am trying to help. That's all.
I was gonna end the conversation because you started end it first. I said I was trying to help you from embarrassing yourself but if you insist, I will leave you alone but don't blame me later. That's the moment you started to break down and angered at me. Who is the real troll here?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
what? You are the one who started first calling me jerk and an ass?
what the heck
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Thanks
Yeah, now that you mention it, their heads are too small. For some reason, i only notice these things when I've already finished the drawing >_<
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Well, of course, that's only a minor detail. As I said, that aside, the artwork IS really good with some fine detail.
So it's still great in the end.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thanks for pointing it out anyway
👍: 0 ⏩: 0