Comments: 23
Yslen [2008-03-05 14:09:45 +0000 UTC]
i think this piece works extremely well... i'll try to put why into words, but i apologise if it doesn't go so well...
the focus is set behind the 'main' flower of the image, but a 'background' leaf in the bottom left of the frame is in sharp focus
this confusion prevents the eye of the viewer resting easily on any on part of the image, and keeps it moving around
in a darker photograph, this could create an unsettling effect, but i feel here, with all the bright, vibrant colours, and with the rear of the frame being flooded with light, the overall impression of the piece is one of great energy - which matches perfectly with the image itself, a 'snapshot' of life, as it were
sorry... science student, not good with that sort of thing, but i wanted to explain how i saw it
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
arctoa In reply to Yslen [2008-03-06 05:03:14 +0000 UTC]
Thank-you for taking the time to write a detailed comment, I appreciate it muchly. I had tried a darker representation in processing but it looked more sort-of dull than unsettling, so I stuck with the energetic interpretation that came straight from the camera.
Cheers for the favourite-list additions, too!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
dena-botbyl [2008-02-29 14:28:31 +0000 UTC]
ahhh! these colours are phenomenal
and i love what you've done with the focus.
great shot.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
arctoa In reply to dena-botbyl [2008-02-29 20:31:34 +0000 UTC]
Thank-you for that, I appreciate it.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
arctoa In reply to willymj [2008-01-11 18:24:14 +0000 UTC]
Heh, thank-you for adding this to your favourites. I appreciate it.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
CarpeSav [2008-01-02 01:54:38 +0000 UTC]
I love the colors in this, very beautiful..
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
arctoa In reply to CarpeSav [2008-01-02 23:29:25 +0000 UTC]
Thank-you for that, I appreciate it.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
LaughingAstarael [2007-12-21 02:23:39 +0000 UTC]
This, too, is beautiful, but I like the previous one more... something about that one had such joy and movement in it, whereas this is very still.
Still lovely (:
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
arctoa In reply to LaughingAstarael [2007-12-21 18:39:43 +0000 UTC]
That's interesting; most people seem to prefer this one over the other. You weirdy, you. :D
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
LaughingAstarael In reply to arctoa [2007-12-22 17:04:21 +0000 UTC]
Oh me and my concerted efforts to be different. -long-suffering sigh-
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
arctoa In reply to LaughingAstarael [2007-12-22 18:36:11 +0000 UTC]
Hahah. Something like that, anyway.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
SanguineAthena [2007-12-16 09:19:53 +0000 UTC]
>.> What the hell?
This made me laugh because it's so... normal!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
arctoa In reply to SanguineAthena [2007-12-16 18:24:13 +0000 UTC]
College assignments often are, esepcially when one is feeling particularly uninspired at any given moment.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
SanguineAthena In reply to arctoa [2008-01-03 04:22:11 +0000 UTC]
It's still good, though. I mean, it's perfect. Just very unusual. For you.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
arctoa In reply to SanguineAthena [2008-01-03 14:36:20 +0000 UTC]
I'm not sure about perfect, but it is somewhat unusual when compared to most of my other material. It is what was at-hand at the time to allow me to demonstrate the technique that the assignment requested.
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
arctoa In reply to SanguineAthena [2008-01-05 11:40:23 +0000 UTC]
I would presume it would be.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0
Tar-Ankalime [2007-11-22 19:21:07 +0000 UTC]
:Wow: Great, great, great!!!
๐: 0 โฉ: 1
arctoa In reply to Tar-Ankalime [2007-11-22 19:35:56 +0000 UTC]
Thankyou for that, and for adding this to your favourites; I appreciate it.
๐: 0 โฉ: 0