Comments: 67
alliechan1000 [2012-01-31 02:25:20 +0000 UTC]
I would play that game if you were in it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AskTereziPyrope In reply to alliechan1000 [2012-01-31 02:51:21 +0000 UTC]
theres this actual version with terezi in it
its somewhere in the mspa forums
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tigare [2012-01-26 22:28:19 +0000 UTC]
Phuq. I luv T3R321.....NO OBJECTION THIS TIME!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AskTereziPyrope In reply to Tigare [2012-01-27 05:30:29 +0000 UTC]
T3R3Z1*
C4NT 4NYBODY G3T 1T R1GHT TH3S3 D4YS OH M4N
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
purplehairedluv [2012-01-23 22:48:56 +0000 UTC]
Answering asks: ur doing it right.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
InvadersForever [2012-01-23 21:05:42 +0000 UTC]
Awesome! Get the name right!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
CheshireChaosWolf [2012-01-23 20:58:01 +0000 UTC]
It be funny if the OBJECTION was spelled OBJ3CT1ON
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
evolutionlab [2012-01-23 20:57:40 +0000 UTC]
hilarious!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Forest-Sprite [2012-01-23 19:03:01 +0000 UTC]
Oh my goodness.. She would probably be a mix of Wright and Franziska.. IT WORKS, AH.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JuciVegeSC [2012-01-23 16:50:20 +0000 UTC]
Isn't it T3R3Z1, to be precise? She only replaces A, E and I with 4, 3 and 1, 413 being the numbers of the blind prophets. If you'd be interested.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AskTereziPyrope In reply to JuciVegeSC [2012-01-23 21:59:15 +0000 UTC]
uh im pretty sure i know her quirk
did i mess up somewhere
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JuciVegeSC In reply to AskTereziPyrope [2012-01-23 22:11:46 +0000 UTC]
She doesn't use 2 for Z. Only the numbers of the blind prophets. Not textbook leetspeek. She's what I know never been seen using any other numbers.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AskTereziPyrope In reply to JuciVegeSC [2012-01-23 22:14:46 +0000 UTC]
i never used a 2 for z???
my handwriting is probably too sloppy, i'm pretty sure i know the importance of the number "413" in homestuck
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
mmnnbbvvcc632 [2012-01-23 07:09:03 +0000 UTC]
Cannot breath. Too much win.
IMNOTWORTHY
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Skull-E [2012-01-23 06:43:52 +0000 UTC]
OVER RULED!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MatiasuKera [2012-01-23 03:49:55 +0000 UTC]
Has anyone even thought of this yet? XDDD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
PunkNarumi In reply to MatiasuKera [2012-01-23 06:21:08 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, the people who made the game, probably.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Bladebrent [2012-01-23 03:48:48 +0000 UTC]
w0u1d y0u pr3f3r a11 qu3st10n5 b3 typ3d l1k3 th1s?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bladebrent In reply to AskTereziPyrope [2012-01-24 00:32:46 +0000 UTC]
y0ur r1ght, y0u d0nt typ3 l1k3 th1s, YOU TYP3 MOR3 L1K3 TH1S
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bladebrent In reply to AskTereziPyrope [2012-01-24 03:32:21 +0000 UTC]
So you just keep watching this? Thats it? I bet there isnt even a good character in this
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AskTereziPyrope In reply to Bladebrent [2012-01-24 03:47:33 +0000 UTC]
its not a show, its a comic
are you trying to offend me or something
ok to make this easier state the reaction you want from me and i'll give it to you, make it simple
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bladebrent In reply to AskTereziPyrope [2012-01-24 04:29:47 +0000 UTC]
It seems closer to an interactive adventure where you only have one option through the whole thing.
you appear to have stopped your L33t speak. Something the matter?
why would I tell you the specific reaction im trying to draw from you? I didnt even think my comment would go on for this many replies.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AskTereziPyrope In reply to Bladebrent [2012-01-24 05:07:29 +0000 UTC]
i was roleplaying? this is an ask account, as it says right in my username, "ASKterezipyrope", where you roleplay as a character. and act like them. characters in homestuck have quirks and all that, thats why i was typing in L33T and now i'm out of character. simple?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bladebrent In reply to AskTereziPyrope [2012-01-24 05:11:01 +0000 UTC]
Then you're breaking character right now :/. I still dont see how Asking you to have a specific response would be a good idea. Maybe in a Private Note but still. I dont usually comment on Ask accounts, I just asked the one question in the beginning and I didnt expect to go much farther than that
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AskTereziPyrope In reply to Bladebrent [2012-01-24 05:16:15 +0000 UTC]
yes. i am breaking character, so i can have a proper conversation without the character getting in the way. asking for specific responses? those are called requests/commissions. usually the questions are broad enough for me to imagine my own ideas, its just a springboard to get off at, its just for fun to draw responses and be creative.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bladebrent In reply to AskTereziPyrope [2012-01-24 05:19:23 +0000 UTC]
Ah, I see. Oh so when you asked if I wanted a specific reaction, you were thinking I wanted a Picture drawn? No, I was just screwing around. Personally, I would of gone onto my normal account to talk with someone if I had to break character but I dont have an Ask account so.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AskTereziPyrope In reply to Bladebrent [2012-01-24 05:23:53 +0000 UTC]
by specific reaction, i meant if you wanted me to act insulted or upset or whatever you wanted me to be, seemed like it.
i would go on my normal account, but theres a chance you would be confused and all that jazz and be like "woah who are you", i can go on my main account to chat if it bothers you that much.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bladebrent In reply to AskTereziPyrope [2012-01-24 05:26:16 +0000 UTC]
I still find it weird to ask for a specific reaction, you'd think part of the fun with these would be to see how the character reacts. You could come online and say "Hey, im the one who made the Ask account" and maybe have your account as named as the creator of the ask account in the Journal or something but whatever. Its fine, you dont have to switch
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AskTereziPyrope In reply to Bladebrent [2012-01-24 05:32:08 +0000 UTC]
usually i ignore questions demanding me to react in a certain way, those are just plain boring to answer. i really like questions that put the characters in a scenario because its like a story, and you can make a comic or picture from there.
most people wouldn't switch from account to account, its annoying and most just go out of character on their accounts when talking. its really bothersome when you have to log back on and off fiftymillion times.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bladebrent In reply to AskTereziPyrope [2012-01-24 05:34:55 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, Thats kinda what I would expect.
That makes sense, it would be incredibly annoying.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SilentTheZoroark [2012-01-23 02:39:24 +0000 UTC]
best thin yet ter
so by the wway
do you wwant to go out on a date wwith me
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SilentSwindler [2012-01-23 02:35:03 +0000 UTC]
new computer background.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>