Comments: 56
AzureGuardian In reply to Deviant-Dave [2005-08-19 01:51:43 +0000 UTC]
Yeah it would be.. I need to get out into the country more though..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bobdabird [2005-08-10 18:25:41 +0000 UTC]
umm wow this oen is awesome the exposure on the rain is perfect
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vitriolata [2005-08-08 05:45:59 +0000 UTC]
Very cool, it's kind of funky how the trails go over the wires since they were moving. Nice work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
reflexes [2005-08-08 02:49:06 +0000 UTC]
Amazing how did you capture it?!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ToxicPhotographer [2005-07-08 02:05:12 +0000 UTC]
the stars look like they are almost moving while the poll stays stationary and "grounds" you - great job!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
clare-1107 [2005-05-30 13:18:32 +0000 UTC]
.very cool. i wish i had a camera that let me do nightphotos.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AzureGuardian In reply to clare-1107 [2005-05-30 14:07:32 +0000 UTC]
What kind of camera do you have? I am sure that it can do what i did here. This was only a 15 second exposure. You only need about 8 seconds to reduce some speeding cars to a field of lights.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
clare-1107 In reply to AzureGuardian [2005-06-01 11:18:24 +0000 UTC]
.nah i know mine doesnt let me set the exposure time..i really need to get a better camera.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
aperfecttool72 [2005-05-11 06:41:15 +0000 UTC]
This is awesome. I just tried to do something like this earlier tonight but it didn't come out nearly as good as this did.
Then again the longest shot i did was about 4 minutes tops...
I'll have to try longer next time... by the way, what was the moon phase when you took this shot?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AzPaz [2005-05-10 14:33:01 +0000 UTC]
thats a really great photo...a pitty that i cant get my fuji s7000 digital camera to stay open that long....unless you know of a way ...if so it would be great ....i think i may need to buy an analog camera tho....*sigh*...money for developing *sigh again*
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AzureGuardian In reply to napolux [2005-05-04 17:12:16 +0000 UTC]
Thanks so much for your imput. Never forget the most important tool in photography.. that is TIME!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
brassshadow [2005-05-01 00:32:56 +0000 UTC]
Interesting shot,
I just learned something,
I didn't realize that there where any production digital cameras including dSLRs that could do exposures longer than 30sec,
This interests me because I sometimes do stuff with long exposures and want to try some longer than 16sec for certain stuff such as light painting,
Maybe in a few years I might go to a true dSLR, instead of my limited SLR-like camera,
Did you have to do anything special to get your digital to do such a long exposure?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
JunairWiare [2005-04-24 23:01:28 +0000 UTC]
Hi, came across this while browsing the galleries.
This is really cool. And, actually, I'm not sure if the light pollution is such a bad thing, in this case. It adds a sort of surreal, maybe even dream-like, element to the picture. It's quite pretty.
*Destop'D*
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JunairWiare [2005-04-24 23:01:26 +0000 UTC]
Hi, came across this while browsing the galleries.
This is really cool. And, actually, I'm not sure if the light pollution is such a bad thing, in this case. It adds a sort of surreal, maybe even dream-like, element to the picture. It's quite pretty.
*Destop'D*
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AzureGuardian In reply to mikes-toothbrush [2005-04-21 19:27:49 +0000 UTC]
This is the only one of three shots that turned out. It is actually a 20 Minute exposure. The streaks or "rain" you see in the sky are stars. The movement of the earth is seen in the paths they make across the sky. If i could get farther away from the cities i would have a much better time trying to have successful results. The fading you see is actually due to light polution in the cities. Sure i am out in the middle of nowhere minnesota but there is still enought light to drown out the stars. Thanks so much for all you comments, I really appreciate them.
Brady Whealon
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AzureGuardian In reply to mikes-toothbrush [2005-04-21 19:27:16 +0000 UTC]
This is the only one of three shots that turned out. It is actually a 20 Minute exposure. The streaks or "rain" you see in the sky are stars. The movement of the earth is seen in the paths they make across the sky. If i could get farther away from the cities i would have a much better time trying to have successful results. The fading you see is actually due to light polution in the cities. Sure i am out in the middle of nowhere minnesota but there is still enought light to drown out the stars. Thanks so much for all you comments, I really appreciate them.
Brady Whealon
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ckyhouseboat [2005-04-11 19:48:27 +0000 UTC]
Since I did not know how these pictures were done and now i know, hehe, i really enjoy looking at this one. Next time though you need to find a spot with no light polution. And yea, the blankets would come in handy next time...nice work
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AzureGuardian In reply to ckyhouseboat [2005-04-11 20:09:33 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Hun.. Yeah blankets are key!!
I WILL SEE YOU IN DECEMBER!!!! tomorow......
hehe i love Aqua Teen Hunger Force!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
yoodoo [2005-04-10 21:36:20 +0000 UTC]
Woa, I like the special effect on this one !
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AzureGuardian In reply to yoodoo [2005-04-10 21:57:00 +0000 UTC]
No special effect. That is an actual exposure. The only differance is that there was very little light so i needed a 20 minute exposure to get any color and contrast. The curves are stars in the sky moving as the earth spins!!
Thanks for the comment!
Brady Whealon
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>