Comments: 31
V1EWT1FUL [2024-01-02 00:06:22 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Phracker [2023-12-10 18:17:33 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
citytoon [2020-01-07 04:09:43 +0000 UTC]
trump a villain
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
soulessone12 [2018-11-09 03:44:07 +0000 UTC]
welp it seems season Two of the Donald Trump Show has been greenlit, titled "curb your impeachment", I look forward to the hilarity that will ensure as the Democrats try to use their control of the House to there advantage only to get cock blocked by the Republican control Senate
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IreneBelserion69 In reply to soulessone12 [2018-11-12 17:46:32 +0000 UTC]
Considering they don't even have a majority in the Senate much less 2/3rds Majority votes in either house or senate, it's going to be a laughable second season.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Zage56 [2018-11-08 17:45:09 +0000 UTC]
Donald Trump WILL continue to WIN.
Princess Pelosi will be the PERFECT Judas Goat,
as Dem leader of the House.
This will be FUN to watch.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RedAmerican1945 In reply to Zage56 [2018-11-08 18:38:19 +0000 UTC]
>Donald Trump WILL continue to WIN.
>Dems win the house.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RedAmerican1945 In reply to Zage56 [2018-11-09 00:15:33 +0000 UTC]
You guys just cant admit to being beat by liberals. Kinda like when the right cried about Le Pen being cuked by Macron.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChurchMilitant In reply to RedAmerican1945 [2018-11-13 17:59:58 +0000 UTC]
It is natural for Dems to win seats back on the following midterm. On the midterm after Obama's election, Reps won back 68 seats. What did the Dems win back, 26 or so? And they lost 4 or 5 seats in the Senate, maybe more depending of recounts.
And as far as admitting defeat in an election, are you suggesting liberals did so after getting smashed in 2016??? Right. . .
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RedAmerican1945 In reply to ChurchMilitant [2018-11-13 22:33:37 +0000 UTC]
I don't like the dems, or liberals for a matter, but I find it quite ironic how most right wingers were screeching about a red wave only to get that idea thrown away by a minor dem victory.
They should have owned up to what caused them defeat in 2016. Running Hillary and not pushing for things like Medicare for all and affordable college etc.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChurchMilitant In reply to RedAmerican1945 [2018-11-13 23:40:43 +0000 UTC]
I can accept that, but it was actually a victory for the Repubs because no legislation can pass unless the senate approves it, and when Ginsburg takes a dirt nap, ( she already fell a few days ago and broke some bones) it's an assured appointee to the supreme court next time around with the added senate seats.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Fujin777 [2018-11-07 23:07:02 +0000 UTC]
Agreed!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kajm [2018-11-07 08:10:51 +0000 UTC]
They are calling it for the Dems in the House, but there's still seats undecided? 24 seats is barely enough for what the Dems want to do.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OnlyTheGhosts In reply to Kajm [2018-11-07 11:41:33 +0000 UTC]
Some seats won't be decided for days yet.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Kajm In reply to OnlyTheGhosts [2018-11-07 11:47:03 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, frustrating.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChurchMilitant In reply to Kajm [2018-11-13 18:00:57 +0000 UTC]
It's a loss but not as bad as it could have been, things really won't change that much.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Zage56 In reply to Robotnik14 [2018-11-08 17:49:31 +0000 UTC]
Spot on! The House has no power to pass Bills without the Senate!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Robotnik14 In reply to Zage56 [2018-11-08 17:57:39 +0000 UTC]
Exactly! No shitty commie or sjwtard law is gonna fuck our progress now...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kessy-athena [2018-11-07 05:03:48 +0000 UTC]
You do realize that looks like a Sieg Heil?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Vader999 In reply to kessy-athena [2018-11-07 06:41:16 +0000 UTC]
Sieg Heil just ripped off the Roman Salute. Which even Jews in the Roman Legions did.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
Balddog4 In reply to kessy-athena [2018-11-07 05:57:24 +0000 UTC]
I wanted his fist closed but i couldn't find one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Balddog4 In reply to OnlyTheGhosts [2018-11-07 15:57:30 +0000 UTC]
Thanks. I'll use that for my next deviation.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OnlyTheGhosts In reply to Balddog4 [2018-11-07 21:56:27 +0000 UTC]
You're welcome.
Don't bother with Google, it's crap and the Google execs are blatantly biased to present the worst about Trump anyway.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kessy-athena In reply to Balddog4 [2018-11-07 07:03:08 +0000 UTC]
LOL The search engines can be weird sometimes, can't they?
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Kdick0987654321 In reply to kessy-athena [2018-11-08 21:40:08 +0000 UTC]
I would say biased more than weird because OnlyTheGhosts does have a point. I've had better results using Bing. Microsoft doesn't seem to be as biased as Google.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kessy-athena In reply to Kdick0987654321 [2018-11-09 00:48:39 +0000 UTC]
And you have actual evidence of bias? Or are you just living in Ghost's fantasy world of, "Gee, when I search for anything about Trump, I find out he's a traitor and a crook. It must be a conspiracy!"
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Balddog4 In reply to kessy-athena [2018-11-07 07:16:40 +0000 UTC]
Yep. Gotta love the internet.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0