Comments: 342
Baranha In reply to ??? [2013-05-08 12:54:29 +0000 UTC]
Thank you DeilspaceGrist.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
boborly713 [2013-04-10 22:26:32 +0000 UTC]
awesome
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Skycrawler00 [2012-12-07 03:08:00 +0000 UTC]
Interesting. Surprising that the length is exactly 1000 meters, but okay. Radar, really? Should just have some superior cameras/sensor arrays that can create a holographic image from the light coming towards the vessel. Radar has to be sent from the vessel to the target, pings off that, and then has to travel all the way back to the vessel. Why wait twice as long for radar when you just have to carefully 'watch' the light of other vessels come towards the battleship? Secondary weapons? Use of missiles? What kind of weapon are the main turrets? Railgun, laser, massive missile launchers, or plasma? Defenses? Shielding? Armor (and thickness)? CIWS?
It also seems like the battleship has carrier capabilities. A major flaw, windows. An unnecessary structural weakness in space. Otherwise, a very streamlined/smooth looking battleship.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
olternaut [2012-07-16 17:23:26 +0000 UTC]
Did you ever do a 3d version of this ship? Very cool design by the way.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Baranha In reply to olternaut [2012-07-17 22:10:47 +0000 UTC]
No Sir, I don't have those Skills. but thanks for posting.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Baranha In reply to wuestenbrand [2012-04-25 02:12:15 +0000 UTC]
Thank you wuenstenbrand
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Darkchi2 [2011-11-08 09:38:11 +0000 UTC]
really like this one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Humble-Ravenwolf [2011-11-03 03:34:29 +0000 UTC]
^_^ That's a very awesome Battleship, I wish that was real...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
armycadets [2011-10-25 20:38:24 +0000 UTC]
Gawd i wana fly this!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
cryonis [2011-10-22 08:25:08 +0000 UTC]
Good!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AFanCorp [2011-10-12 03:38:14 +0000 UTC]
May I do a 3d rendition of this?
Assuming it hasn't been done...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Baranha In reply to AFanCorp [2011-10-12 17:05:43 +0000 UTC]
Of course you can. I'd love to see it because I have no 3D skills.
link me the final.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Norbert2009 [2011-09-04 11:29:44 +0000 UTC]
This is a great job!!!!! Hail to japan!!!!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Baranha In reply to Norbert2009 [2011-09-05 12:39:52 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Norbert2009
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Mirk217 [2011-04-01 18:32:10 +0000 UTC]
+++
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Baranha In reply to Mirk217 [2011-04-01 22:06:00 +0000 UTC]
thanks mate
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
VincentGordon [2011-01-01 08:14:31 +0000 UTC]
fantastic design!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Baranha In reply to emikochan13 [2010-12-26 03:49:24 +0000 UTC]
yeah none of that stuff was supposed to be taken seriously, it wasn't supposed to be legible but instead just filler but you can read it in the D/L version.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RunicArbiter [2010-12-14 03:56:09 +0000 UTC]
You know, I believe CCP has doing a rematch.
Check this website: [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Baranha In reply to RunicArbiter [2010-12-14 15:58:05 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for the Link RunicArbiter, I will deffinetly apply and maybe the old girl needs an upgrade.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
RunicArbiter In reply to Baranha [2010-12-14 21:13:53 +0000 UTC]
One upgrade you may wan to consider is making sure the ship has the the correct amount of turret placements. In EVE, battleships models have 16 places to put a turret, which equals 8 High Slots. Each High Slot gets 2 turrets, which are placed at opposite ends of a ship (top/bottom or right/left) to insure proper coverage.
There are two possible issues I see with you model.
One is that your ship should have turrets available for all 8 High Slots. That means 16 turrets placements. Now, not all ship classes can equip turrets in all their High Slots, but the ship MODELS are made in such a way that (if a new class of ship was created that DID allow all High Slots to hold turrets) the ship would already have a place for the turrets to be placed.
Right now I only see 6 turrets, which would only equal 3 High Slots. Now like I said before, not all ships classes can equip turrets on all their High Slots, but the ship model should have turret placements for 16 turrets if CCP decides your ship should have all 8 High Slots support turrets.
The second issue is your model's fire vector coverage (I think thats how you say it). As mentioned before, each High Slot gets 2 turrets which are place on opposite sides of the ship model in order to insure proper coverage of firepower. That means if one turret is on top, there HAS to be one turret on the bottom. It doesn't matter where on the bottom or on the top the turrets are place. As long as there is a turret on the top and a turret on the bottom, things are golden. The same holds true for turrets place on the sides of a ship.
So, the issue that your model has is that, while you have 4 turrets on the top of your ship, there are only 2 turrets on the bottom. In order to insure proper coverage, you should have the same amount of turrets on the bottom as you do on top.
So, to narrow it down to one sentence: You should have a total of 16 turret placements prepared, and be sure that there are turrets on one side, there are an equal number of turrets on the other side.
I hope I explained it well enough to understand. I might have repeated a few things, but I has trying to be consistent. Hope I helped.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Baranha In reply to RunicArbiter [2010-12-14 22:34:07 +0000 UTC]
You are AMAZING RunicArbiter, this will be very helpful and just to make sure i understand it;if I have 4 slots on the top i should technically have 4 slots on the bottom? equaling 8 slots in total? with 2 turrets per slot? that would be the easiest placement of the guns?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KahunaSniper [2010-12-12 21:18:13 +0000 UTC]
This is pretty badass! Good work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Baranha In reply to KahunaSniper [2010-12-13 15:48:28 +0000 UTC]
Thank you KahunaSniper
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KahunaSniper In reply to Baranha [2010-12-13 19:26:38 +0000 UTC]
No problem.
Keep up the good work. I think if they ever did an expansion where it would go back to the Milky Way universe you would be a top candidate for the work for the Japanese.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
StarvingFartist [2010-12-12 15:53:34 +0000 UTC]
I really, really like these ship. I hope it wins.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Baranha In reply to StarvingFartist [2010-12-13 15:48:59 +0000 UTC]
Thank you DeVilWolFie, I got 2nd place.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
zentary [2010-11-18 03:30:27 +0000 UTC]
looks like a gallente ship to me. I have to say that is one badass design it would be a pleasure to actually fly that ship in Eve. which i currently play.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KhaliNephtys [2010-11-12 14:32:41 +0000 UTC]
What a beautiful ship, I actually like this one a lot more than the one that won the comp. I'd certainly fly one of these, if only I didn't specialise in Caldari vessels.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Baranha In reply to KhaliNephtys [2010-11-12 19:46:26 +0000 UTC]
Thank you KhaliNephtys.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Sajuuk-Cor [2010-11-12 11:49:10 +0000 UTC]
Sad to see that this beautiful ship is only on the 2nd place, it looks much better than the "Tornado" and it would be a good Caldari Battleship! It could replace the old Raven.
PS: I love the Control Tower on top of the hull, reminds me of Japan's WW2 Battleships XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Baranha In reply to Sajuuk-Cor [2010-11-12 19:46:07 +0000 UTC]
Thank You Sajuuk-Cor. I was infact inspired by the Japanese Destroyer, Yamamoto.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Baranha In reply to Stitchfan [2010-11-02 09:51:42 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Stitchfan but don't let my ship stop you from completing yours. Share it with the world.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Elemento11 [2010-10-30 15:23:44 +0000 UTC]
well worth a second place!
I knew youll end up there man,
1st place shhh, i was tough!
Congrats..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Baranha In reply to Elemento11 [2010-11-02 10:02:19 +0000 UTC]
Thanks Elemento11, I am happy with 2nd too
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Elemento11 In reply to Baranha [2010-11-02 14:04:51 +0000 UTC]
Congrats again man....
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>