Comments: 15
BeckKeep In reply to A113Panda [2011-01-10 19:55:05 +0000 UTC]
Oh hey, thank you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sarelm [2010-12-22 07:26:50 +0000 UTC]
Now the real question... What one of them actually moves slower? >.>
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BeckKeep In reply to Sarelm [2010-12-22 07:28:16 +0000 UTC]
Their base speed is actually the same-- OH GOD I'M A DORK
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sarelm In reply to BeckKeep [2010-12-22 08:49:46 +0000 UTC]
Dork? No. I'm ashamed that I didn't know that. Then again, I've got something against training slow pokemon for whatever reason... I think I just hate Trick Room. The question is in the IVs then. >.> Who had the better breeder... Since I don't think either of you put any EV points into a rather unredeemable stat.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BeckKeep In reply to Sarelm [2010-12-22 08:56:57 +0000 UTC]
I generally dislike slow Pokemon as well, but I usually have one or two slower ones in the party while the others are super fast.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sarelm In reply to BeckKeep [2010-12-22 09:00:28 +0000 UTC]
X3 Yeah. They're hard to totally avoid, especially if you need a good wall in there.... At least I can't think of a good defensive pokemon that isn't pretty dang slow. Having a certain love for water pokemon then, I'm now strangely heartened you picked a Slowking for one of your "slower" ones.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BeckKeep In reply to Sarelm [2010-12-22 09:23:44 +0000 UTC]
Oh man I LOVE Slowking. Mine knows Flamethrower, simply on the basis that I love the idea of a Slowking breathing fire.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sarelm In reply to BeckKeep [2010-12-22 19:29:48 +0000 UTC]
Hell yes!! In combination of Nasty Plot... That's one devilish little pokemon you've got there. X3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BeckKeep In reply to Sarelm [2010-12-22 19:30:21 +0000 UTC]
Yeeeeessssss
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Windstel [2010-11-09 21:30:12 +0000 UTC]
This is BEAUTIFUL. :"D
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BeckKeep In reply to Windstel [2010-11-09 22:41:27 +0000 UTC]
Thank you. 8D
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ClosetExtrovert [2010-10-30 06:09:16 +0000 UTC]
It's a surfing safari... zone!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0