HOME | DD
bigua β
Heat
Published: 2004-07-11 18:22:30 +0000 UTC; Views: 7312; Favourites: 106; Downloads: 1360
Redirect to original
Description
this hot days....
Related content
Comments: 95
WOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWYYYYYYYYYYyyy yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!! OH MY GOD LOVE IT SO MUCH!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
hehee, thats a little bit naughty!
love your style, some beautiful shapes there! xx
π: 0 β©: 0
Is it just me or has everyone clearly overlooked the fact that this picture is riddled with huge anatomical flaws?
And what the hell is up with her overly detailed man hands? This picture is so two dimensional and abstract (without actually being a convincing abstract piece, therefore making it even worse) in its visuals itβs rather sickening. I am totally not convinced of the passion, itβs just so very flat and boring. Certainly not something I would consider as a daily deviation by a long shot. And what the hell is up with that guys hand clasping is own side?
I've heard of under rated artists. This is certainly what I would consider over rated piece.
π: 0 β©: 2
you're the very first person who don't like my work. And i appreciatte that.
Although i have to say you something, i 've never pretend to represent the human body as a anatomy study.... N e v e r , i just only try to represent my emotions, i know the " third" hand looks strange but i wanted to put it there, just to show in "my" way, the strengh of that hug....
π: 0 β©: 0
you raise some good points that i too had noticed. that (male) hand coming from nowhere was bothering me, but i decided to talk about how this breaks DA staff's own policies on depicting a 'sexual act of any kind' and the hypocrisy.
π: 0 β©: 2
wtf
"Unrelentless"
Dont know here I got unrealities from
π: 0 β©: 1
well i got back from one of the owners/founders a message saying a] they didnt see it as a sexual imaeg and b] no violation of policy happened as far as they are concerned.
i listed the DA policy and stated the mainstream perception of the image. in the end.. 'they' will do what suits them because it is a two-tiered system..
i think its a cop out to save face.
π: 0 β©: 1
You're fighting a losing battle.
π: 0 β©: 0
Oh, the cruel and unrealities irony!
Za googlesβ¦zey do nuthzing!
π: 0 β©: 0
the personification of butterflies, a dance of indecision, leading to cosmic spiritual implosion. This is unspeakably beautiful.
π: 0 β©: 0
Okay I admit I'm not a fan of the aass cheeks but the guy's is rather strange with the shades of green which I am noticing also the yellow mostly looks great!
π: 0 β©: 0
Sexy. Very much so. 
π: 0 β©: 0
I don't know why, but this makes my skin crawl.
π: 0 β©: 0
Very nice work.
You have a style all of your own and i like that.
π: 0 β©: 0
What a brilliant and interesting style! Really catching, really different... I don't really know what else to say, other than its stylish and quite original in my eyes. Very, very, cool 
π: 0 β©: 0
It is wrong that now I crave boyfriend? Haha. Thank you. Not only is this cute, but emotional, passionate and sweet.. you should sell prints. This would be cute plastered on someones bedroom/bathroom wall.
π: 0 β©: 0
Oh my...
Is it getting hot in here or what?
π: 0 β©: 0
really cool, but I think it would look better without the third hand/the hand in the "middle" (belonging to the man.. i guess)
π: 0 β©: 0
grrr meeow.... The temptation is killing me.
Great picture.
π: 0 β©: 0
lol if he does it in spanish i'll do it in french. C'est tres bon. J'adore les colours et le insperation. Je ponce que il est tres interessant et vous creatavment ecrier cette artistique. 
π: 0 β©: 0
*it's gettin' hot in here, so take off all your clothes*
love your style.
π: 0 β©: 0
personally i could give a toss for erotic art or sex in art but i think its pretty hypocritical that other post this kind of stuff and its removed from their page but its ok if some member of DA staff goes against DA's own policies about depticting sexual acts to feature something.
the art is great, i just think the DA staff need to get their heads out of their arses.
π: 0 β©: 1
It's a nice picture, but I agree. I know other deviants who have had things less sexual than this removed from their gallery as a policy violation.
π: 0 β©: 2
π: 0 β©: 1
I certainly don't mean to harass the artist - Personally, I have nothing againt the picture getting DD - I just think it is true (and not right) that the policy doesn't seem to be evenly enforced. Maybe the best thing would be to take this to the complaint forum - even though I think the issue should be addressed, I know if I were the artist I'd rather the debate not take place in my comment box...
π: 0 β©: 1
well i got back from one of the owners/founders a message saying a] they didnt see it as a sexual imaeg and b] no violation of policy happened as far as they are concerned.
i listed the DA policy and stated the mainstream perception of the image. in the end.. 'they' will do what suits them because it is a two-tiered system..
i think its a cop out to save face.
π: 0 β©: 0
Yes, I second that. What hypocrisy... like anything other than sex is going on in this picture. Yet others get banned and/or have much less obviously sexual pictures removed.
π: 0 β©: 2
the DA policy says [QUOTE] This means no displays of sexual acts of any kind, no displays of masturbation, no displays of erections, no displays of male ejaculates or excess female lubricants and no other pornographic or explicit sexual posing or displays.[/QUOTE]
personally its not the art or the artist. its the hypocrisy, i know DA cant catch every image that violates their policy but at the same time i think DA staff PROMOTING it is just adding fuel to the fire. i guess you could argue that the act is implicit (implied) rather than explicit, but the DA policy that the staff want us to abide by says any kind..
i dont like the feeling that 'they' can do what they want but 'we' have to play pawn to their decisions when they feel like..
π: 0 β©: 0
true, but I think this one was more for an artful purpose than for some zitty teenager to jack off to.
π: 0 β©: 1
oh, i agree. and i am NOT out on a witchhunt for the artist OR their art.. its the DA hypocrisy that i detest. i feel bad marring this work with such a comment here but its just really annoying me.
i agrew with you too about such art being 'witty' as it were.
π: 0 β©: 0
erotique, excellent work and awesome creativity, instant
π: 0 β©: 0
this looks really good.. i love the vector look it has and the amount of levels and detail..
but something it right.. look at the "middle" hand, the one thats holding the man from the side, is it his? i dont think a normal person can go all the way around the girl and still hold him like that..
maybe you should fix that..
part of that its a really cute job.. i love the title
π: 0 β©: 0
Perfect fire. Passionate and caring. Nice use of color.
Simple - lovely.
π: 0 β©: 0
nic epeice, outwardly sexual without being duigusting
π: 0 β©: 0
Very interesting way of conveying that; very de-personalised, what with being headless, but also without showing the details that seperate fine art from entertainment, if you get what I mean. I've seen a few similar images which I feel conveyed this a bit better and more sensitively, but this one has a greater amount of detail. The skill with which the anatomy is represented is variable from area to area, seeming a bit superficial (the back) or formulaic (the hands and feet.) Initially I thought the genders of both the people were ambiguous, and like the faces/identities which can be whoever the individual viewer wishes to imagine them to be, the genders could be whatever the individual viewer wishes to imagine them to be... a particularily novel and clever idea! But I'm not certain now that it is that way.
π: 0 β©: 0
Brilliant 
π: 0 β©: 1
Felicitaciones por tu primer Daily Deviation!!! Muchos exitos mΓ‘s... Ya sabes que eres mi favorita en DA!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
| Next =>